Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-889-7 | CAS number: 75-65-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The procedures used followed the description of Maron and Ames modified in accordance with the procedures outlined in OECD 471. Maron DM and Ames BN, 1983. Revised methods for the Salmonella mutagenicity test. Mutat. Res., 113:173-215.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 005
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methylpropan-2-ol
- EC Number:
- 200-889-7
- EC Name:
- 2-methylpropan-2-ol
- Cas Number:
- 75-65-0
- Molecular formula:
- C4H10O
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methylpropan-2-ol
- Reference substance name:
- tertiary butyl alcohol
- IUPAC Name:
- tertiary butyl alcohol
- Details on test material:
- Laboratory A:
-Identity (according to report): t-butyl alcohol
-Supplier: Fisher Scientific
-Purity: 99.92%
Laboratory B:
-Identity (according to report): t-butyl alcohol
-Supplier: Sigma-Aldrich
-Purity: 99.7%
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- His (-)
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Laboratory A: Salmonella typhimurium TA 102 was obtained from Prof. Bruce Ames, University of California, CA, USA
Laboratory B: Salmonella typhimurium TA 102 was obtained from SafePharm Laboratories, Shardlow, UK - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: TA 102 carries ochre mutations of the hisG428 gene, deep rough (rfa) mutations, and the factor resistance plasmid pKM 101. TA 102 carries this hisG428 mutation on a multiple copy plasmid (pAQ1) and is excision repair competent (uvrB+).
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Laboratory A: used Aroclor 1254-treated male Sprague-Dawley rat liver S9; Laboratory B: used phenobarbital-β-naphthoflavone-treated Sprague-Dawley rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Laboratory A:
Trial 1 – 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 μg/plate
Trial 2 – 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 μg/plate
Laboratory B:
Trial 1 & 2 – 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2500, 5000 μg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Laboratory A: tertiary butyl alcohol was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), spectrophotometric grade
Laboratory B: tertiary butyl alcohol was dissolved in either deionized water or in dried DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 1,8-dihydroxyanthraquinone
- Remarks:
- Used by Laboratory A; obtained from Sigma Chemicals; used in the presence of S9 at a dose of 30 μg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cumene hydroperoxide
- Remarks:
- Used by Laboratory A; obtained from Sigma Chemicals; used in the absence of S9 at a dose of 100 μg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- Used by Laboratory B; obtained from Sigma Chemicals; used in the presence of S9 at a dose of 1 μg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Used by Laboratory B; obtained from Sigma Chemicals; used in the absence of S9 at a dose of 10 μg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- The test was run in two independent laboratories.
TEST METHOD:
Laboratory A: pre-incubation method
The top (overlay) agar was prepared with 0.6% (w/v) agar and 0.5% (w/v) NaCl and was supplemented with 10 mL of 0.5 mM histidine/0.5 mM biotin solution per 100 mL agar for selection of histidine revertants. A 0.1 mL sample of a 10-hr bacterial culture and 0.5 mL S9 mix or 0.5 mL 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) were placed in gas-tight glass vials. A 0.1 mL sample of the test compound was injected through septa fitted to the vial caps and these mixtures incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Two mL of molten overlay agar was added and the mixture poured on plates containing 25 mL minimal agar. The plates were incubated for 72 hr at 37 °C, after which the plates were examined for mutants and signs of toxicity.
Laboratory B: plate incorporation method
The top (overlay) agar was prepared with 0.6% (w/v) agar and 0.5% (w/v) NaCl and was supplemented with 10 mL of 0.5 mM histidine/0.5 mM biotin solution per 100 mL agar for selection of histidine revertants. The test material, a 0.1 mL sample of a 10-hr bacterial culture and 0.5 mL S9 mix or 0.5 mL 0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) were placed in plastic vials, 2 mL of molten overlay agar was added and the mixture poured on plates containing 25 mL minimal agar. The plates were incubated for 72 hr at 37 °C, after which the plates were examined for mutants and signs of toxicity.
Solvent control:
Laboratory A: DMSO
Laboratory B: DMSO or water
Number of Replications: All assays were done in duplicate and consisted of positive and vehicle controls and at least 5 dose levels of tertiary butyl alcohol. Although not specifically stated in the publication, it is presumed that each trial consisted of triplicate plates since the study was conducted according to OECD Guideline 471 and results for each dose and trial were presented as mean revertants per plate with standard deviation. - Evaluation criteria:
- Laboratory A: Treatment was required to produce increases in numbers of mutant colonies of at least 2.0 times the concurrent vehicle control before a response was considered positive.
Laboratory B: Treatment was required to produce increases of at least 2.0 times the concurrent vehicle control at one or more concentrations, or a significant, dose-related response before a response was considered positive. - Statistics:
- Appropriate statistical methods were used. Revertants were presented as the mean ± standard error.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Cytotoxicity: Survival of strain TA 102 was unaffected by tertiary butyl alcohol at 5000 μg/plate both in the presence and absence of S9 from male Sprague-Dawley rats treated with either Aroclor 1254 or phenobarbital-β-naphthoflavone.
Results for test chemical: There was no statistically significant mutagenic response in strain TA102 over the entire range of concentrations tested in both trials, in the presence and absence of S9. In the Laboratory B study, all dose levels tested in water in the absence of S9 were associated with mutant numbers greater than was found in the controls, the 5000 μg/plate dose having a 1.54-fold higher number of mutants per plate than the water control. However, the data were inconsistent and in the repeat trial, there was no dose-related response.
Results for controls: A satisfactory response was obtained with the solvent and positive control plates. There was no difference in response between the solvent controls DMSO and water. - Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type:
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative Tested in two laboratories, using two different methods (pre-incubation and plate incorporation) and two different solvents (DMSO or water).
Tertiary butyl alcohol, at concentrations up to 5000 μg/plate, did not induce mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strain TA 102 with or without induced rat liver S9.
Based on an absence of genotoxic/mutagenic effects in this study, tertiary butyl alcohol is not classifiable for Germ Cell Mutagenicity according to GHS. - Executive summary:
In a reverse gene mutation assay in bacteria using the pre-incubation method, strain TA 102 of Salmonella typhimurium was exposed to tertiary butyl alcohol in DMSO at concentrations of 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, and 5000 μg/plate in the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In an independent laboratory, the study was repeated in the plate-incorporation method using water or dried DMSO as the vehicle and tertiary butyl alcohol concentrations of 100, 200, 500, 1000, 2500 and 5000 μg/plate. There was no evidence of cytotoxicity in either study and the choice of vehicle had no effect on the response. The positive and vehicle controls induced the appropriate response. There was no statistical or dose-related increase in number of mutant colonies over background in either study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.