Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Based on the results of this ames study it is concluded that Dioctyldodecyl Dodecanedioate is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and E. coli WP2 in the presence and absence of meta-bolic activation under the experimental conditions in this study.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
05May2021 - 24Jun2021
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted 26Jun2020
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
Version / remarks:
adopted 30 May 2008
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
benzo(a)pyrene
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Plate incorporation method: 5, 1.5, 0.5, 0.15 and 0.05 μL/plate.
Pre-incubation method: 5, 2.5, 1.25, 0.63, 0.31 ,0.16 and 0.08 μg/plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
Acetone
Based on the non-GLP pre-test, acetone was chosen as vehicle, because the test item was sufficiently soluble, and this solvent does not have any effects on the viability of the bacteria or the number of spontaneous revertants in the tested concentrations.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
spontaneous revertant rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Dimethylsulfoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
Remarks:
Without S9 mix for 20µg plate for TA98
Without S9 mix for 30µg plate for TA1537
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
spontaneous revertant rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Dimethylsulfoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
benzo(a)pyrene
Remarks:
With S9 mix for 20 µg/plate for TA98
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
spontaneous revertant rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Demin Water
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
Without S9 mix for 1.8µg/plate for TA100
Without S9 mix for 1µg/plate for TA1535
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
spontaneous revertant rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
Dimethylsulfoxide
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other:
Remarks:
With S9 mix for 1µg/plate for TA100
With S9 mix for 1µg/plate for TA1535
With S9 mix for 2.4µg/plate for TA1537
With S9 mix for 50µg/plate for E. Coli
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
spontaneous revertant rates
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
no
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
methylmethanesulfonate
Remarks:
Without S9 mix for 2µg/plate for E. coli
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
Per bacteria strain and concentration, three plates with (+S9) and three plates without metabolic activation (-S9) were used.

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable):
- Test substance added in medium; in agar (plate incorporation);
preincubation;

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable: 20 mins
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 48 hrs
- Harvest time after the end of treatment (sampling/recovery times):


FOR GENE MUTATION:

- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells: at least 109 bacteria/mL (correlating to 100 colo-nies/plate after dilution),
- Criteria for small (slow growing) and large (fast growing) colonies:

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
The bacterial background lawn was visible and not affected. The number of revertant colo-nies was not reduced. Thus, no signs of toxicity towards the bacteria strains could be ob-served.

METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY

- OTHER:
Sterility was examined
Evaluation criteria:
A biologically relevant increase is described as follows:
 if in the bacteria strains S. typhimurium TA98, TA100 and E. coli WP2 the number of revertants is at least twice as high than the reversion rate of the negative controls (increase factor of at least 2.0)
 if in the bacteria strains S. typhimurium TA1535 and TA1537 the number of re-vertants is at least three times higher than the reversion rate of the negative con-trols (increase factor of at least 3.0).
Statistics:
standard deviation
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
True negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Conclusions:
Based on the results of this study it is concluded that Dioctyldodecyl Dodecanedioate is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and E. coli WP2 in the presence and absence of meta-bolic activation under the experimental conditions in this study.
Executive summary:

Based on the results of this study it is concluded that Dioctyldodecyl Dodecanedioate is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and E. coli WP2 in the presence and absence of meta-bolic activation under the experimental conditions in this study.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of this ames study it is concluded that Dioctyldodecyl Dodecanedioate is not mutagenic in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535 and TA1537 and E. coli WP2 in the presence and absence of meta-bolic activation under the experimental conditions in this study.