Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-336-6 | CAS number: 3069-29-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Information is available from three bacterial mutagenicity studies on N-[3-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine (CAS No. 3069-29-2, EC No. 221-336-6). No further information is available for the registered substance, however, reliable data are available for the closely related substance, N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS No. 1760-24-3, EC No. 217-164-6).
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames
test): negative with and without metabolic activation in Salmonella
typhimurium strains TA 98, 100, 102, 1535, 1537 (OECD Test Guideline
471) (LPT, 2002).
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: read-across from closely related
substance N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS 1760-24-3):
negative with and without metabolic activation in Chinese hamster ovary
cells (similar to OECD Test Guideline 476) (BRRC, 1988a).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2002-04-10 to 2002-06-13
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 31.6, 100, 316, 1000 and 3160 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethylene glycol dimethylether
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility properties and relative non-toxicity to bacteria - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 1535, TA 100 (without metabolic activation): 10 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA 98 (without metabolic activation): 10 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537 (without metabolic activation): 100 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- TA 102 (without metabolic activation): 1300 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-anthracene amide 2 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- TA 98, TA 102, TA 1537 (with metabolic activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- TA 100, TA 1535 (with metabolic activation): 1500 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration x 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
METHOD OF APPLICATION in agar (plate incorporation)
ACTIVATION: S9 mix contained glucose-6-phosphate and NADP as co-factors. 0.5 ml S9 mix was added to 2 ml top agar, 0.1 ml test solution, 0.1 ml salmonella cell suspension giving a final concentration of 0.9% S9.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 1 hour (second experiment)
- Exposure duration: 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 replicates per concentration, experiment repeated
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: condition of background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- A result is positive if the number of revertants is significantly increased compared with the solvent control to at least 2-fold of the solvent control for TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 and 3-fold of the solvent control for TA 1535 and TA 1537 in both experiments.
Positive results have to be reproducible and the histidine independence of the revertants has to be confirmed by streaking on histidine-free agar plates.
Cytotoxicity is defined as a reduction in the number of colonies by >50% compared with the solvent control and/or a sparse background lawn. - Statistics:
- MANN and WHITNEY and Spearman’s rank.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- background lawn reduced in preincubation experiment at 100 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at 316 µg/plate with metabolic activation. Top dose limited to 3160 µg/plate based on cytotoxicity observed in preliminary test test.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- background lawn reduced in preincubation experiment at 316 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at 1000 µg/plate with metabolic activation. Top dose limited to 3160 µg/plate based on cytotoxicity observed in preliminary test.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- background lawn reduced in preincubation experiment at 3160 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at 316 µg/plate with metabolic activation. Top dose limited to 3160 µg/plate based on cytoxicity observed in preliminary test.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- background lawn reduced at 3160 µg/plate in plate incorporation assay and at 316 µg/plate in preincubation experiment
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- background lawn reduced in preincubation experiment at 316 µg/plate without metabolic activation and at 31.6 µg/plate with metabolic activation. Top dose limited to 3160 µg/plate based on cytotoxicity observed in preliminary test.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Controls were within range of historical controls.
Cytotoxicity: In the plate incorporation test slight cytotoxicity was noted in the test substance in TA 100, with and without metabolic activation.
In the preincubation test without metabolic activation pronounced cytotoxicity was noted at 3160 µg/plate in TA98, from 316 µg/plate to 3160 µg/plate in TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1537, and from 100 µg/plate up to 3160 µg/plate in TA 1535.
With metabolic activation, pronounced cytotoxicity was noted at concentrations 316 µg/plate – 3160 µg/plate in TA 98 and TA 1535, at 1000 µg/plate and 3160 µg/plate in TA 100 and TA 1537 and from 100 µg/plate – 3160 µg/plate in TA 102.
- Conclusions:
- N-[3-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine has been tested in a reliable bacterial mutagenicity study conducted according to OECD 471, and in compliance with GLP conditions. No increase in revertant frequency was observed with or without metabolic activation when the substance was tested up to a concentration of 3160 µg/plate in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 in either the initial plate incorporation assay or the repeat experiment using the pre-incubation method. Cytotoxicity was observed at the highest concentration tested in strain TA 100 in the plate incorporation test, and in all strains in the pre-incubation assay. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1988-01-13 to 1988-03-21
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA Health Effects Test Guidelines HG-Gene Muta-Somatic Cells (1983)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HGPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Ham's Modified F12 Medium
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: no
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: no - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor-1254 induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- without metabolic activation: 2.5, 3.0, 3.25, 3.5 and 4.0 mg/ml, with metabolic activation: 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 mg/ml
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cell culture medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cell culture medium
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-dimethylnitrosamine
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 5 hours (with and without metabolic activation)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 9-12 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): TG selective medium
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicate cultures. Surviving fraction was determined at 18 and 24 hours after removal of chemical using 4 plates per culture and 100 cells per plate; mutant frequency was determined using 5 plates per culture. The test was repeated.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: plating efficiency
ACTIVATION: S9 mix contained glucose-6-phosphate and NADP as co-factors, and 5% of S9. 1.0 ml of S9 mix was added to 4 ml of culture medium, giving a final concentration of 1% S9. - Evaluation criteria:
- The criteria for interpretation of the test results as a positive or negative response depend upon both the level of statistical significance from the concurrent control and the evidence of a dose-response effect following treatment. When a definite dose-response relationship is not evident, but one or more marginally significant values are obtained, a careful examination of the data from the concurrent positive and negative controls and comparisons to historical control data may be used to evaluate the probable biological significance of the responses.
- Statistics:
- Box-Cox transformation
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 4 mg/ml with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- N-(3-trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine has been tested in a reliable study according to an appropriate US EPA test guideline that is equivalent to OECD 476 and in compliance with GLP. An increase in mutant frequency was observed in one of two duplicate cultures with metabolic activation at one concentration in the initial experiment. No other increase in mutant frequency was observed at any concentration with and without activation (5 hours treatment). The experiment was repeated (with metabolic activation): no increase in mutant frequency was observed. The appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of mutations in CHO cells under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- See attachment to Section 13 for justification of read across
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 4 mg/ml with metabolic activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2: Dose range-finding study Number of revertants per plate (2 plates)
|
TA100 |
||
Conc. |
Plate 1 |
Plate 2 |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
145 |
138 |
No |
0.316 |
145 |
141 |
No |
1 |
128 |
148 |
No |
3.16 |
145 |
135 |
No |
10 |
174 |
139 |
No |
31.6 |
137 |
141 |
No |
100 |
148 |
146 |
No |
316 |
163 |
140 |
No |
1000 |
156 |
150 |
No |
3160 |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
5000 |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
*solvent control with ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
Table 3: Experiment 1 Plate incorporation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
||||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
22.7 |
27.7 |
No |
133.3 |
138.7 |
No |
264.7 |
268 |
No |
31.6 |
25 |
21.7 |
No |
117 |
156 |
No |
296.3 |
285.7 |
No |
100 |
23.3 |
30.7 |
No |
123.7 |
136.7 |
No |
268 |
269.7 |
No |
316 |
28.7 |
33.3 |
No |
110.3 |
141.7 |
No |
267 |
274.7 |
No |
1000 |
26.3 |
29 |
No |
125 |
124.3 |
No |
275 |
264 |
No |
3160 |
25 |
27.3 |
No |
114.7 |
150.3 |
Yes** |
249 |
244 |
No |
Positive control |
1026.3 |
1066 |
No |
1161 |
1175.3 |
No |
1191 |
1170.7 |
No |
*solvent control with ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
** scarce background bacterial lawn
Table 3: Experiment 1 Plate incorporation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
16.3 |
411.7 |
No |
11.3 |
13.3 |
No |
31.6 |
14 |
18 |
No |
12 |
14.3 |
No |
100 |
15.3 |
21.7 |
No |
13.7 |
17.3 |
No |
316 |
17.3 |
22.7 |
No |
12.7 |
16.3 |
No |
1000 |
17.3 |
19.7 |
No |
14.7 |
12.3 |
No |
3160 |
17.7 |
18.7 |
No |
14.7 |
11.7 |
No |
Positive control |
401 |
411.7 |
No |
974.3 |
945.7 |
No |
*solvent control with ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
Table 4: Experiment 2 Preincubation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
||||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
42.7 |
38.7 |
No |
128.3 |
155.7 |
No |
291.7 |
287.3 |
No |
3.16 |
27.3 |
32 |
No |
119 |
147.3 |
No |
254.7 |
300 |
No |
10 |
29 |
34.3 |
No |
128.7 |
151 |
No |
258.3 |
277.3 |
No |
31.6 |
34 |
30.3 |
No |
120.7 |
140.7 |
No |
252.7 |
290.3 |
No |
100 |
22.7 |
27 |
No |
126 |
153.7 |
No |
257 |
0 |
Yes |
316 |
24.7 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
170.7 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
1000 |
24.3 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
3160 |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
Positive control |
983.3 |
1085.3 |
No |
1471 |
1443.3 |
No |
1488.3 |
1445.3 |
No |
*solvent control with ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
Table 4: Experiment 2 Preincubation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
15.3 |
15.3 |
No |
9.7 |
14 |
No |
3.16 |
13 |
17 |
No |
8.3 |
9 |
No |
10 |
13.3 |
15 |
No |
8 |
11.7 |
No |
31.6 |
13 |
16.3 |
No |
8.7 |
10.7 |
No |
100 |
0 |
13 |
Yes |
9 |
10.7 |
No |
316 |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
10.3 |
Yes |
1000 |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
3160 |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
0 |
0 |
Yes |
Positive control |
684.3 |
680.3 |
No |
529.3 |
540.3 |
No |
*solvent control with ethylene glycol dimethyl ether
CHO Mutation Assay: with and without metabolic activation
Results on evaluation of plating efficiency and mutant colonies - Experiment 1
|
Mutant colonies |
Plating efficiency |
||
Test chemical |
(Total of 2 plates) |
% of Combined Solvent Controls |
||
|
- S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
Negative control |
0 |
18 |
106.3 |
105.9 |
Solvent control A |
20 |
2 |
93.7 |
102.3 |
Solvent control B |
0 |
0 |
106.3 |
97.8 |
2.0A |
- |
6 |
- |
120.5 |
2.0B |
- |
13 |
- |
104.4 |
2.5A |
6 |
35 |
103.4 |
107.5 |
2.5B |
1 |
15 |
110.0 |
100.5 |
3.0A |
5 |
4 |
104.6 |
91.0 |
3.0B |
2 |
0 |
124.4 |
109.2 |
3.25A |
5 |
- |
101.1 |
- |
3.25B |
5 |
- |
96.0 |
- |
3.5A |
0 |
0 |
89.4 |
116.0 |
3.5B |
1 |
0 |
103.7 |
107.7 |
4.0A |
0 |
-** |
114.7 |
-** |
4.0B |
5 |
-** |
94.0 |
-** |
Positive control |
143 |
55 |
115.7 |
113.2 |
**= Cytotoxic, cultures did not grow
Results on evaluation of plating efficiency and mutant colonies - Experiment 2
Test chemical
|
Mutant colonies (Total of 2 plates) |
Plating efficiency |
+S9 |
||
Negative control |
13 |
88.2 |
Solvent control A |
0 |
104.1 |
Solvent control B |
1 |
95.8 |
2.25A |
12 |
118.7 |
2.25B |
0 |
99.7 |
2.5A |
0 |
106.8 |
2.5B |
0 |
111.1 |
2.75A |
0 |
101.9 |
2.75B |
0 |
96.6 |
Positive control |
63 |
92.6 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Micronucleus assay in mouse (ip administration): read-across from
closely related substance N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine
(CAS 1760-24-3): negative in peripheral lymphocytes (similar to OECD
Test Guideline 474) (BRRC, 1988)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1988-03-15 to 1988-04-08
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: EPA Health Effect T G, EPA Report 560/6-83-001
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss Webster
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Portage, MI
- Age at study initiation: 5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: male - 22.5 g - 28.0 g. female - 19.8 g - 21.7 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: randomised separately by sex
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: 5 mice/sex/cage in shoe-box type plastic cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): controlled but not specified
- Humidity (%): controlled but not specified
- Air changes (per hr): not known
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hr light/dark cycle - Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: corn oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: incompatible with water thus corn oil was used
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 200 mg/kg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single i p dose
- Frequency of treatment:
- One treatment only
- Post exposure period:
- 30, 48 and 72 hours
- Dose / conc.:
- 87.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 175 mg/kg bw/day
- Dose / conc.:
- 280 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- yes
- Positive control(s):
- Triethylenemelamine
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): known to demonstrate the sensitivity and responsiveness of the animals in the definitive test.
- Route of administration: i p
- Doses / concentrations: 0.3 mg/kg bw - Tissues and cell types examined:
- Blood was collected by nicking the tail of each animal with a scalpel and slides prepared for each animal per sampling time. Polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE's) were examined.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: Determination of the PCE/NCE ratio for the groups of animals with partial mortality was used to evaluate the possibility of bone marrow cytotoxicity from the test chemical. Three dose levels of approximately 80%, 50% and 25% of the LD50 value were evaluated for effects upon the incidence of micronuclei.
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields): i.p. injection followed by sampling times of 30, 48 and 72 hours
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Slides were stained with Gurr's R-66 Giemsa diluted in phosphate buffer. Slides were coded by animal number only and read blindly.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: A minimum of 1000 PCE's were examined microscopically for each animal per sample time. The PCE/NCE ratio for approximately 1000 total cells was calculated and recorded. The number of micronucleated PCE/1000 NCE was recorded. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test result is considered to be negative if no statistically significant or dose related increases are apparent between the vehicle control and groups of animals treated with Organofunctional Silane A-1120.
- Statistics:
- Fisher's Exact Test (Sokal and Rohlf, 1981)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- LD50 354 mg/kg bw and above. PCE/NCE ratio was reduced at highest concentration, 48 h exposure and at all doses, 72 h exposure.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 125 mg/kg bw - 2000 mg/kg b
- Solubility: Incompatible with water thus corn oil was used
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: All mice dosed at 1000 mg/kg bw and 2000 mg/kg bw died. 500 mg/kg bw was lethal to 4 out of 5 females and all the male mice. One female tested at 250 mg/kg bw died.
- Evidence of cytotoxicity in tissue analyzed: a decrease in the PCE/NCE ratio to 80% of the control value was observed at the 48-hour treatment interval. At 72 hours the PCE/NCE ratios had increased.
- Harvest times: 48 hours
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): negative.
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): PCE/NCE ratio was slightly decreased at 72 hour treatment interval.
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: Both dose levels and route were appropriate.
- Statistical evaluation: Analysis of variance indicated no sex-related differences in the incidence of micronuclei. No statistically significant (p = 0.01) or treatment related increases in the numbers of micronuclei were observed at any dose or treatment interval. - Conclusions:
- N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine has been tested in a reliable study according to EPA Health Effect T G, Report 560/6-83-001, which is similar to OECD 474, and in compliance with GLP conditions. No treatment related increases in numbers of micronuclei in PCE's of Swiss-Webster mice were observed. Relatively high dose levels of the test compound were tested up to 80% of the LD50 with no indication of significant induction of micronuclei. The PCE/NCE ratio was reduced at the highest concentration, 48 h exposure and at all doses, 72 h exposure, indicating exposure of the target tissue to the test substance. The test compound is considered to be negative for the induction of micronuclei under the conditions of this test.
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- See attachment to Section 13 for justification of read-across.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- LD50 354 mg/kg bw and above. PCE/NCE ratio was reduced at highest concentration, 48 h exposure and at all doses, 72 h exposure.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 3: Summary of micronucleus results
|
30 hours |
48 hours |
72 hours |
|||||||||
Treatment groups mg/kg bw |
Number of PCE’s with micronuclei per 1000 PCE’s |
Mean PCE’s/1000 NCE (SD) |
Number of PCE’s with micronuclei per 1000 PCE’s |
Mean PCE’s/1000 NCE (SD) |
Number of PCE’s with micronuclei per 1000 PCE’s |
Mean PCE’s/1000 NCE (SD) |
||||||
Male |
Female |
Group mean |
SD |
Male |
Female |
Group mean |
SD |
Male |
Female |
Group mean |
SD |
|
Vehicle control |
4.0 (2.00) |
1.6 (0.89) |
33.7 |
5.52 |
2.4 (2.70) |
3.6 (1.14) |
36.4 |
4.24 |
3.8 (2.05) |
3.8 (2.68) |
42.9 |
3.25 |
87.5 |
5.0 (2.55) |
3.6 (1.52) |
31.8 |
6.79 |
3.0 (1.73) |
2.2 (0.84) |
36.0 |
0.28 |
6.4 (2.19) |
2.8 (1.64) |
33.9 |
2.12 |
175 |
2.6 (1.52) |
4.0 (1.22) |
34.9 |
8.06 |
3.2 (1.10) |
3.8 (1.64) |
37.2 |
7.92 |
2.3 (0.96) |
5.2 (3.96) |
35.5 |
6.68 |
280 |
3.4 (2.19) |
3.6 (2.19) |
35.4 |
4.81 |
3.4 (3.29) |
3.0 (1.22) |
30.4 |
3.39 |
3.8 (1.92) |
1.2 (0.84) |
27.9 |
1.27 |
Positive control |
36.2 (16.84) |
28.6 (10.31) |
27.4 |
9.05 |
Not evaluated |
Not evaluated |
Not evaluated |
Not evaluated |
Table 4 Summary of micronucleus frequency and statistical differences from controls (Fisher's exact test, one-tailed)
Treatment/dose mg/kg bw |
No. PCE observed |
PCE with micronuclei |
Statistical significance |
|
30 hour sample |
||
Vehicle control |
10 000 |
28 |
NS |
87.5 |
10 000 |
43 |
0.05>p>0.01* |
175 |
10 000 |
33 |
NS |
280 |
10 000 |
35 |
NS |
Positive control |
10 000 |
324 |
p< 0.001 |
|
48 hour sample |
||
Vehicle control |
10 000 |
30 |
NS |
87.5 |
10 000 |
26 |
NS |
175 |
10 000 |
35 |
NS |
280 |
10 000 |
32 |
NS |
|
72 hour sample |
||
Vehicle control |
10 000 |
38 |
NS |
87.5 |
10 000 |
46 |
NS |
175 |
10 000 |
35 |
NS |
280 |
10 000 |
25 |
NS |
Results from sexes are combined as no sex-related differences were shown.
* not considered of biological significance
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Information is available from three bacterial mutagenicity studies on N-[3-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine. No further information is available for the registered substance, however, reliable data are available for the closely related substance, N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine.
N-[3-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine has been tested in a reliable bacterial mutagenicity study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP. No increase in revertant frequency was observed with or without metabolic activation when the substance was tested up to a concentration of 3160 µg/plate in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 in either the initial plate incorporation assay or the repeat experiment using the pre-incubation method. Cytotoxicity was observed at the highest concentration tested in strain TA 100 (plate incorporation) and in all strains in the pre-incubation assay. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results (LPT, 2002).
Two additional bacterial mutagenicity studies also gave negative results (Microtest Research Ltd., 1988 and Huntingdon Life Sciences, 1999). The most reliable study was chosen as key study.
In vitro cytogenicity testing is not required as there is an in vivo cytogenicity study is available for the analogue substance.
The analogue substance, N-(3-trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine, has been tested in a reliable study according to an appropriate US EPA test guideline that is equivalent to OECD Test Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP. An increase in mutant frequency was observed in one of two duplicate cultures with metabolic activation at one concentration in the initial experiment. No other increase in mutant frequency was observed at any concentration with or without metabolic activation (5 hours treatment). The experiment was repeated (with metabolic activation): no increase in mutant frequency was observed. The appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of mutations in CHO cells under the conditions of the test (BRRC, 1988a).
The analogue substance, N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine, has been tested in a reliable in vivo micronucleus study according to EPA Health Effect T G, Report 560/6-83-001, which is similar to OECD Test Guideline 474, and in compliance with GLP conditions. No treatment related increases in numbers of micronuclei in PCE's of Swiss-Webster mice were observed. Relatively high dose levels of the test compound were tested up to 80% of the LD50 with no indication of significant induction of micronuclei. The PCE/NCE ratio was reduced at the highest concentration, 48 h exposure and at all doses, 72 h exposure, indicating exposure of the target tissue to the test substance. The test compound is considered to be negative for the induction of micronuclei under the conditions of this test (BRRC, 1988b).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity data, N-[3-(dimethoxymethylsilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine is not classified for mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.