Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://www.echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_classification-and-labelling-and-pbt-assessment.png)
PBT assessment
Administrative data
PBT assessment: overall result
- PBT status:
- the substance is not PBT / vPvB
- Justification:
Persistence (P, vP)
Biodegradation in water: screening test
In a study conducted according to OECD 301B, under GLP conditions, the test material attained 26% degradation after 28 days and therefore is not readily biodegradable.
Biodegradation in water and sediment
In an OECD 308 study, conducted according to GLP, the test material dissipated rapidly from the water of both aquatic sediment systems, with DT50 values of 2.6 days (Calwich Abbey Lake) and 10.4 days (Emperor Lake). The DT50 value in the sediment phase of Calwich Abbey Lake was 811 days, based on two sampling intervals. The DT50 value for the decline in the sediment phase of Emperor Lake could not be calculated, as the test material (as % applied parent) continued to increase until the last sampling interval. Decline in the overall aquatic sediment system was slow and corresponded to DT50 values of 657 days (Calwich Abbey Lake) and 636 days (Emperor Lake).
Due to the low solubility of the test material and rapid partitioning from the aqueous phase to the sediment, aerobic mineralisation in surface water – simulation biodegradation testing according to OECD Testing Guideline No. 309 is considered technically not feasible.
Biodegradation in soil
In an OECD 307 study, conducted according to GLP, the mean distribution and recovery of radioactivity ranged from 99.7 to 106.2% AR in Cuckney soil, 93.9 to 103.4% AR in Drayton soil, 97.6 to 107.2% AR in Elmton soil, and 95.2 to 106.2% AR in Calke soil. Low levels of radioactivity were detected in the bound residues (mean values =10.6% applied radioactivity) and mean mineralization of the test item to CO2 was less than or equal to 0.9% applied radioactivity. There was little or no evidence for degradation of test material in soil at 12 +/- 2 deg C and pF2, under aerobic conditions, and kinetic analysis of the data was therefore considered inappropriate.
Bioaccumulation (B, vB)
No experimental study on bioaccumulation is available on the registered substance. According REACH Annex IX column 2, the Bioaccumulation not need to be performed if the substance has a low potential for bioaccumulation (for instance a log Kow ≤ 3) and/or a low potential to cross biological membranes. In a study conducted according to TG OECD 117 (HPLC method) and GLP, the partition coefficient is log Pow greater than 6.5. Therefore considering the properties of the registered substance, it is not possible to waive the bioaccumulation study.
Based upon a weight of evidence approach considering the complex composition of the UVCB, the BCF has been predicted to be 381.4 L/kg wet-wt calculated on the worst case constituent (having the highest lipophilic potential - log Kow, predicted among the UBVC's constituents). Considering that the applicability domain of the QSAR is not fulfilled, a bioacumulation test on fish has been proposed according the TG OECD 305-III (for more details, please see the bioaccumulation Endpoint Study Record).
Toxic (T)
Aquatic chronic toxicity according to GLP and TG OECD 201, 211 and 210 demonstrate that no effects were observed up to NOEL > 100 mg/L (WAF) on three trophic levels (algae, daphnia and fish). Therefore, the registered substance does not meets the criteria for toxicity for freshwater or marine organisms (NOEC > 0,01 mg/L) according REACH annex XIII.
In an OECD 471 study, the test material is non-mutagenic (negative) to Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli bacterial strains. In an OECD 471 study, OECD 473, and OECD 476 the structurally similar read across substance is non-mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium bacterial cells, is non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes, is non-mutagenic to rat lymphocytes, and is non-mutagenic to mouse lymphoma.
Based on the results of an OECD 414, the maternal and embryo-fetal No-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (NOAEL) of the test item were considered to be 330 mg/kg/day. The maternal NOAEL was considered to be 330 mg/kg/day based on the mortality and low body weight gains in rats receiving 1000 mg/kg/day; and the embryo-fetal NOAEL, although no effect on embryo-development was established, was considered to be 330 mg/kg/day - being dependent on maternal toxicity.
In a read-across study with a structurally similar substance, the 90 day repeated dose toxicity (oral route) NOAEL in rats is greater than or equal to 1,000 mg/kg bw/d.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)