Registration Dossier

Physical & Chemical properties

Boiling point

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
boiling point
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
08 September 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 103 (Boiling Point)
Version / remarks:
1995
Deviations:
not specified
Qualifier:
according to
Guideline:
EU Method A.2 (Boiling Temperature)
Version / remarks:
2008
Deviations:
not specified
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
differential scanning calorimetry
Key result
Boiling pt.:
357 - 358 °C
Atm. press.:
1 013 hPa
Decomposition:
no

Table 1. Results of the DSC measurements

 Sample  Sample weight (mg)  Onset of effect (deg C)  Range of effect (deg C)  Weight loss (mg)  Atmospheric pressure (hPa)
 1  14.06  358.25  270 - 380 (endothermic)  14.01  1009
 2  14.84  356.83  300 - 370 (endothermic)  14.83  1009
Conclusions:
The test item has a boiling range of 357 – 358 °C corrected to normal atmospheric pressure (1013 hPa) as determined by differential scanning calorimetry.
Executive summary:

The test item has a boiling range of 357 – 358 °C corrected to normal atmospheric pressure (1013 hPa) as determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to Regulation EC No. 440/2008 Method A.2. and OECD Test Guideline 103 (1995). The study is considered to be reliable without restrictions (Klimisch 1). The study was not GLP-compliant, however the testing laboratory holds a GLP certificate.

Description of key information

The test item has a boiling range of 357 – 358 °C corrected to normal atmospheric pressure (1013 hPa), as determined by differential scanning calorimetry.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Boiling point at 101 325 Pa:
357 °C

Additional information

The test item has a boiling range of 357 – 358 °C corrected to normal atmospheric pressure (1013 hPa) as determined by differential scanning calorimetry according to EU Method A.2. and OECD Guideline 103 (2017). The study is considered to be reliable without restrictions (Klimisch 1). The study was not GLP-compliant, however the testing laboratory holds a GLP certificate.