Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Endpoint summary

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

Sensitization Study

Following challenge with 10% w/w 434 -280 -4 in mineral oil, U S P, dermal scores of 1 were noted in 5/20 test animals at the 24- and 48-hour scoring intervals. Dermal reactions in the remaining test and challenge control animals were limited to scores of 0 to±.Group mean dermal scores were noted to be higher in the test animals as compared with the challenge control animals.

 

Following rechallenge with 10% w/w 434 -280 -4 in mineral oil, U S P, dermal scores of 1 were noted in 2/20 test animals at the 24 and 48-hour scoring intervals. Dermal reactions in the remaining test and rechallenge control animals were limited to scores of 0 to±.Group mean dermal scores were noted to be similar in the test animals as compared with the rechallenge control animals.

 

Two of the 20 (10%) induced animals responded at both challenge and rechallenge. No confounding irritation (no scores>.±) was observed at either challenge. The following animals were considered sensitized: G8658/F and G8659/ F.

 


Migrated from Short description of key information:
The test substance was assessed for skin sensitisation potential according to OECD Test Guideline 406 using an in vivo method. The substance did not meet the criteria for classification as a skin sensitiser.

Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
The study was conducted on the target substance in vivo, in an appropriate test species and according to internationally recognised guidelines.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)

Justification for classification or non-classification

Sensitization Study

Following challenge with 10% w/w 434 -280 -4 in mineral oil, U S P, dermal scores of 1 were noted in 5/20 test animals at the 24- and 48-hour scoring intervals. Dermal reactions in the remaining test and challenge control animals were limited to scores of 0 to±.Group mean dermal scores were noted to be higher in the test animals as compared with the challenge control animals.

 

Following rechallenge with 10% w/w 434 -280 -4in mineral oil, U S P, dermal scores of 1 were noted in 2/20 test animals at the 24 and 48-hour scoring intervals. Dermal reactions in the remaining test and rechallenge control animals were limited to scores of 0 to±.Group mean dermal scores were noted to be similar in the test animals as compared with the rechallenge control animals.

 

Two of the 20 (10%) induced animals responded at both challenge and rechallenge. No confounding irritation (no scores>.±) was observed at either challenge. The following animals were considered sensitized: G8658/F and G8659/ F.

 


Migrated from Short description of key information:
The test substance was assessed for skin sensitisation potential according to OECD Test Guideline 406 using an in vivo method. The substance did not meet the criteria for classification as a skin sensitiser.

Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
The study was conducted on the target substance in vivo, in an appropriate test species and according to internationally recognised guidelines.