Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-668-2 | CAS number: 842-07-9
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
Description of key information
Carcinogenic LOAEL was considered to be 37.5 mg/kg bw/day when F344/N male and female rats were treated with 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) orally in feed for 103 weeks.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Carcinogenicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer-reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 453 (Combined Chronic Toxicity / Carcinogenicity Studies)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Combined Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study of C. I. Solvent Yellow 14 in rats
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): C. I. Solvent Yellow 14
- Molecular formula: C16H12N2O
- Molecular weight: 248.284 g/mole
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: solid
- Purity:94.1% pure
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): remaining 6% of the test material was comprised of various chemical intermediates used in the manufacturing process; no inorganic salts were present. - Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Source: NCI Frederick Cancer Research Center (Frederick, MD)
- Age at study initiation: Four week old
- Weight at study initiation: No data available
- Fasting period before study:No data available
- Housing: Rats were housed, five per cage, in solid-bottom polycarbonate cages supplied with hardwood chip bedding (source-Lab products, Inc. Cages and bedding were changed twice per week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina Laboratory Chow. Control and test diets were available ad libitum in feed hoppers that were changed weekly.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Tap water, supplied and analyzed by the Columbus, Ohio, water department, was available ad libitum via an automatic watering system.
- Acclimation period:
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21° to 23°C
- Humidity (%): 40%-60% (relative humidity)
- Air changes (per hr): 15 times per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): Standard white fluorescent lighting provided illumination 12 hours per day.
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: - Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Type of inhalation exposure (if applicable):
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- other: No data available
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: Diets were formulated by mixing weighed amounts of Purina Laboratory Chow animal meal and the test chemical for 15 minutes in a Patterson-Kelly twin-shell blender equipped with an intensifier bar.
DIET PREPARATION
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency): once in 10 days
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): Purina Laboratory Chow
- Storage temperature of food: Formulated diets were stored at 23°C for no longer than 10 days
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Purina Laboratory Chow
- Concentration in vehicle: 0, 250 and 500 ppm
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): No data available
- Lot/batch no. (if required): No data available
- Purity: No data available - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Analytical verification of doses was performed by using Gilford 2400-S spectrophotometer and target levels of 250 and 500 ppm were within ±10% of the desired concentrations.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 103 weeks
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Post exposure period:
- 1 weeks
- Remarks:
- 0, 37.5 and 75 mg/kg bw/day
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Total: 300
0 mg/kg bw/day: 50 male, 50 female
37.5 mg/kg bw/day: 50 male, 50 female
75 mg/kg bw/day: 50 male, 50 female - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Random
- Positive control:
- No data available
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- Observation and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice daily
- Cage side observations checked in table [No.?] were included. No data available
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: each month
DERMAL IRRITATION (if dermal study): Not applicable
- Time schedule for examinations: Not applicable
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: every 4 to 5 weeks
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study):
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: Yes
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
FOOD EFFICIENCY:
- Body weight gain in kg/food consumption in kg per unit time X 100 calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No data
WATER CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if drinking water study): No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- Dose groups that were examined: No data
HAEMATOLOGY: No data
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No data available
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: No data
- Time schedule for collection of blood: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- How many animals: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. No data
URINALYSIS: No data
- Time schedule for collection of urine: No data
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: No data
- Animals fasted: No data
- Parameters checked in table [No.?] were examined. No data
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: No data
- Time schedule for examinations: No data
- Dose groups that were examined: No data
- Battery of functions tested: sensory activity / grip strength / motor activity / other: No data
OTHER: - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes
Moribund animals and animals that survived to the end of the bioassay were killed by suffocation in carbon dioxide and necropsied.
Gross and microscopic examinations were performed on major tissues, major organs, and all gross lesions from killed animals and from animals found dead, unless precluded in whole or in part by autolysis or cannibalization.
The tissues were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin-, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The following were examined microscopically: skin (abdominal), lungs and bronchi, trachea, bone, bone marrow (femur), thigh muscle, spleen, lymph nodes, thymus, heart, salivary glands, liver, pancreas, esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, kidney, urinary bladder, pituitary, adrenal, thyroid, parathyroid, testis, prostate, mammary gland, uterus, ovary, brain, epididymus, and all tissue masses. - Statistics:
- Probabilities of survival were estimated by the product-limit procedure of Kaplan and Meier (1958).
Statistical analyses for a possible dose-related effect on survival used the method of Cox (1972) for testing two groups for equality and Tarone's (1975) extensions of Cox's method for testing for a dose-related trend. One-tailed P values have been reported for all tests except the departure from linearity test, which is reported only when its two-tailed P value is less than 0.05.
The one-tailed Fisher exact test (Cox, 1970) was used to compare the tumor incidence of a control group with that of a group of dosed animals at each dose level.
The Cochran-Armitage test for linear trend in proportions, with continuity correction (Armitage, 1971), was also used. Under the assumption of a linear trend, this test determines if the slope of the dose-response curve is different from zero at the one-tailed 0.05 level of significance.
Life table methods were used to analyze the incidence of tumors. - Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not specified
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not specified
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not specified
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not specified
- Haematological findings:
- not specified
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not specified
- Urinalysis findings:
- not specified
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not specified
- Immunological findings:
- not specified
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not specified
- Gross pathological findings:
- not specified
- Neuropathological findings:
- not specified
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Other effects:
- not specified
- Details on results:
- Mortality: In male rats, 34/50 (68%) of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day and 34/50 (68%) of 75 mg/kg bw /day lived till 104 weeks. In female rats, 42/49 (86%) of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day and 38/50 (76%) of 75 mg/kg bw /day lived till at 104 weeks. No significant differences in survival were observed in treated rats as compared to control.
Clinical sign: No compound-related clinical signs were observed in treated rats as compared to control.
Body weight: After week 16 for males and after week 50 for females mean body weights were decreased in treated rats as compared to control.
Food consumption: No compound-related effects on feed consumption were observed as compared to control.
Histopathology: non-neoplastic: multifocal fibrosis of the cardiac valve, atrophy of the pancreatic animus and nephropathy in male and female rat, lymphoid hyperplasia of the lung in male rats and bile duct focal hyperplasia in female rats were observed when treated with 37.5 and 75 mg/kg bw/day as compared to control.
A variety of other nonneoplastic lesions were seen in dosed rats. These were the usual types seen in aging F344 rats (Goodman et al., 1979) and were not considered to be associated with chemical administration.
Histopathology: neoplastic: Increase in Neoplastic nodules of the liver, composed of eosinophilic or basophilic hepatocytes and were accompanied by an angiectactic or cystic change were observed in treated male and female rats as compared to control. Dose related Basophilic and clear cell changes were also generally observed in treated rats. - Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Effect level:
- 37.5 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- histopathology: neoplastic
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- Carcinogenic LOAEL was considered to be 37.5 mg/kg bw/day when F344/N male and female rats were treated with 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) orally in feed.
- Executive summary:
In a Combined Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study, Fischer F344/N male and female rats were treated with 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) in the concentration of 0, 37.5 and 75 mg/kg bw/day orally in feed. In male rats, 34/50 (68%) of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day and 34/50 (68%) of 75 mg/kg bw /day lived till 104 weeks. In female rats, 42/49 (86%) of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day and 38/50 (76%) of 75 mg/kg bw /day lived till at 104 weeks. No significant differences in survival were observed in treated rats as compared to control. No compound-related clinical signs and effects on feed consumption were observed as compared to control. After week 16 for males and after week 50 for females mean body weights were decreased in treated rats as compared to control. In addition, non-neoplastic: multifocal fibrosis of the cardiac valve, atrophy of the pancreatic animus and nephropathy in male and female rat, lymphoid hyperplasia of the lung in male rats and bile duct focal hyperplasia in female rats were observed when treated with 37.5 and 75 mg/kg bw/day as compared to control. A variety of other nonneoplastic lesions were seen in dosed rats. These were the usual types seen in aging F344 rats (Goodman et al., 1979) and were not considered to be associated with chemical administration. Increase in Neoplastic nodules of the liver, composed of eosinophilic or basophilic hepatocytes and were accompanied by an angiectactic or cystic change were observed in treated male and female rats as compared to control. Dose related Basophilic and clear cell changes were also generally observed in treated rats. Therefore, Carcinogenic LOAEL was considered to be 37.5 mg/kg bw/day when F344/N male and female rats were treated with 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) orally in feed for 103 weeks.
Reference
Mean Body Weight Change (Relative to Controls) of Rats Fed Diet Containing C. I. Solvent Yellow 14
Week no. |
Cumulative Mean Body Weigh Change (grams)
|
Weigh Change Relative to Control (a) % |
|||
|
Control |
Low Dose |
High Dose |
Low Dose |
High Dose |
Male |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
131 (b) |
131 (b) |
131 (b) |
|
|
5 |
97 |
100 |
99 |
+3 |
+2 |
26 |
240 |
226 |
231 |
-6 |
-4 |
46 |
275 |
260 |
261 |
-5 |
-5 |
67 |
297 |
282 |
278 |
-5 |
-6 |
88 |
282 |
265 |
261 |
-6 |
-7 |
103 |
283 |
251 |
259 |
-11 |
-8 |
Female |
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
103 (b) |
104 (b) |
102 (b) |
|
|
5 |
38 |
35 |
24 |
-8 |
-37 |
26 |
104 |
100 |
100 |
-4 |
-4 |
46 |
122 |
115 |
120 |
-6 |
-2 |
67 |
144 |
134 |
138 |
-7 |
-4 |
88 |
163 |
145 |
156 |
-11 |
-4 |
103 |
183 |
181 |
176 |
-1 |
-4 |
(a) Weight Change Relative to Controls = {[Weight Change (Dose 1 Group) - Weight Change (Control Group)] X100}/Weight Change (Control Group)
(b) Initial weight.
Analyses of the Incidence of Primary Tumors in Male Rats Fed Diets Containing C. I. Solvent Yellow 14 (a)
Topography: Morphology |
Untreated Control |
Low dose |
High dose |
Subcutaneous Tissue: Fibroma (b) |
3/50 (6) |
2/50 (4) |
6/50 (12) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.667 0.058 5.570 |
2.000 0.454 11.761 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
95 |
78 |
97 |
Hematopoietic System: |
|
|
|
Lymphocytic Leukemia (b) |
19/50 (38) |
1/50 (2) |
3/50 (6) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
Departure from Linear Trend (f) |
P=0.002 |
|
|
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.053 0.001 0.308 |
0.158 0.032 0.492 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
89 |
92 |
72 |
Hematopoietic System: |
|
|
|
All Leukemias (b) |
23/50 (46) |
1/50 (2) |
3/50 (6) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
Departure from Linear Trend (f) |
P<0.001 |
|
|
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.043 0.001 0.248 |
0.130 0.027 0.393 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
89 |
92 |
72 |
Hematopoietic System: |
|
|
|
All Lymphomas or Leukemias (b) |
25/50 (50) |
2/50 (4) |
4/50 (8) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
Departure from Linear Trend (f) |
P<0.001 |
|
|
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.080 0.010 0.294 |
0.160 0.044 0.418 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
89 |
92 |
72 |
Liver: |
|
|
|
Neoplastic Nodule (b) |
5/50 (10) |
10/50 (20) |
30/50 (60) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
N.S. |
P<0.001 (N) |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
2.000 0.675 6.944 |
6.000 2.595 17.463 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
95 |
103 |
95 |
Liver: |
|
|
|
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (b) |
1/50 (2) |
0/50(0) |
2/50(4) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.000 0.000 18.658 |
2.000 0.108 115.621 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
104 |
-- |
103 |
Liver: |
|
|
|
Neoplastic Nodule or Hepatocellular Carcinoma (b) |
6/50(12) |
10/50(20) |
31/50(62) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
N.S. |
P<0.001 (N) |
Departure from Linear Trend (f) |
P<0.030 |
|
|
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.667 0.597 5.164 |
5.167 2.408 12.155 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
95 |
103 |
95 |
Pituitary: |
|
|
|
Chromophobe Adenoma (b) |
5/44(11) |
5/45(11) |
4/43(9) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.978 0.242 3.960 |
0.819 0.173 3.545 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
92 |
104 |
76 |
Adrenal: |
|
|
|
Pheochromocytoma (b) |
6/50(12) |
6/49(12) |
6/50(12) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.020 0.293 3.556 |
1.000 0.287 3.489 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
101 |
79 |
104 |
Thyroid: |
|
|
|
C-Cell Carcinoma (b) |
3/50(6) |
4/49(8) |
2/50(4) |
P Values(c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.361 0.243 8.854 |
0.667 0.058 5.570 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
97 |
104 |
104 |
Pancreatic Islets: Islet-Cell |
|
|
|
Adenoma (b) |
4/50(8) |
3/48(6) |
0/46(0) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.781 0.120 4.374 |
0.000 0.000 1.170 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
81 |
104 |
— |
Pancreatic Islets: Islet-Cell |
|
|
|
Adenoma or Carcinoma (b) |
4/50(8) |
3/48(6) |
1/46(2) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.781 0.120 4.374 |
0.272 0.006 2.613 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
81 |
104 |
104 |
Testis: |
|
|
|
Interstitial-Cell Tumor (b) |
48/50(96) |
46/50(92) |
47/50(94) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.958 0.890 0 1.071 |
0.910 0.979 1.076 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
78 |
68 |
72 |
Analyses of the Incidence of Primary Tumors in Female Rats Fed Diets Containing C. I. Solvent Yellow 14 (a)
Topography: Morphology |
Untreated Control |
Low dose |
High dose |
Subcutaneous Tissue: Fibroma (b) |
0/50(0) |
0/49(0) |
3/49(6) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P=0.036 |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
-- -- -- |
Infinite 0.614 Infinite |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
-- |
-- |
97 |
Hematopoietic System: |
|
|
|
Lymphocytic Leukemia (b) |
9/50 (18) |
0/49 (0) |
0/49 (0) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
Departure from Linear Trend (f) |
P=0.029 |
|
|
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.000 0.000 0.388 |
0.000 0.000 0.388 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
76 |
-- |
-- |
Hematopoietic System: |
|
|
|
All Leukemias (b) |
9/50 (18) |
1/49 (2) |
0/49 (0) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
Departure from Linear Trend (f) |
P<0.001 |
|
|
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.113 0.003 0.771 |
0.000 0.000 0.388 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
76 |
103 |
-- |
Hematopoietic System: |
|
|
|
All Lymphomas or Leukemias (b) |
11/50 (22) |
2/49 (4) |
0/49 (0) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P<0.001 (N) |
P=0.008 (N) |
P<0.001 (N) |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.186 0.021 0.793 |
0.000 0.000 0.307 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
76 |
103 |
-- |
Liver: |
|
|
|
Neoplastic Nodule (b) |
2/50 (4) |
3/49 (6) |
10/48 (21) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P=0.005 (N) |
N.S. |
P=0.011 (N) |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.531 0.183 17.671 |
5.208 1.189 46.803 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
104 |
104 |
91 |
Liver: |
|
|
|
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (b) |
0/50 (0) |
0/49(0) |
2/48(4) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
-- -- -- |
Infinite 0.308 Infinite |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
-- |
-- |
104 |
Liver: |
|
|
|
Neoplastic Nodule or Hepatocellular Carcinoma (b) |
2/50(4) |
3/49(6) |
11/48(23) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P=0.003 |
N.S. |
P=0.006 |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.531 0.183 17.671 |
5.729 1.342 50.869 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
104 |
104 |
91 |
Pituitary: |
|
|
|
Chromophobe Adenoma (b) |
28/44(64) |
19/45(42) |
18/46(39) |
P Values (c),(d) |
P=0.014 (N) |
P=0.035 (N) |
P=0.017 (N) |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.663 0.430 1.029 |
0.615 0.392 0.968 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
96 |
94 |
87 |
Adrenal: |
|
|
|
Pheochromocytoma (b) |
0/49(0) |
1/48(2) |
3/48(6) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
Infinite 0.555 Infinite
|
Infinite 0.614 Infinite
|
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
-- |
104 |
86 |
Thyroid: |
|
|
|
C-Cell Carcinoma (b) |
2/50(4) |
3/49(6) |
3/48(6) |
P Values(c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.531 0.138 17.671 |
1.563 0.187 18.028 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
104 |
104 |
104 |
Mammary Gland: |
|
|
|
Fibroadenoma (b) |
7/50(14) |
8/49(16) |
7/49(14) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.166 0.401 3.489 |
1.020 0.330 3.155 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
97 |
77 |
86 |
Mammary Gland: |
|
|
|
Cystfibroadenoma (b) |
4/50(8) |
2/49(4) |
3/49(6) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S. |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
0.510 0.048 3.383 |
0.765 0.118 4.288 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
104 |
101 |
102 |
Mammary Gland: |
|
|
|
NOS or Adenocarcinoma, NOS (b) |
2/50(4) |
3/50(6) |
0/50(0) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.500 0.180 17.329 |
0.000 0.000 3.381 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
104 |
103 |
-- |
Uterus: |
|
|
|
Endometrial Stromal Polyp (b) |
18/49(37) |
20/47(43) |
11/48(23) |
P Values (c),(d) |
N.S. |
N.S. |
N.S |
Relative Risk (Untreated Control) (e) Lower Limit Upper Limit |
|
1.158 0.672 2.002 |
0.624 0.300 1.238 |
Weeks to First Observed Tumor |
97 |
94 |
104 |
(a) Dosed groups received doses of 250 or 500 ppm in the diet.
(b) Number of tumor-bearing animals/number of animals examined at site (percent).
(c) Beneath the incidence of tumors in the control group is the probability level for the Cochran Armitage test when P is less than 0.05; otherwise, not significant (N.S.) is indicated. Beneath the incidence of tumors in a dosed group is the probability level for the Fisher exact test for the comparison of that dosed group with the untreated control group when P is less than 0.05; otherwise, not significant (N.S.) is indicated.
(d) A negative trend (N) indicates a lower incidence in a dosed group than in a control group.
(e) The 95 percent confidence interval of the relative risk between each dosed group and the control group.
(f) The probability level for departure from linear trend is given when P is less than 0.05 for any comparison.
SUMMARY OF THE INCIDENCE OF NEOPLASMS IN MALE RATS FED DIETS CONTAINING C.I. SOLVENT YELLOW 14
|
Control |
Low dose |
High dose |
Animals initially in study |
50 |
50 |
50 |
Animals necropsied |
50 |
50 |
50 |
Animals examined histopathalogycally |
50 |
50 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
Integumentary System |
|
|
|
*Skin SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA FIBROMA CARCINOSARCOMA |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
*SUBCUT TISSUE SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA BASAL-CELL TUMOR FIBROMA FIBROSARCOMA NEURILEMOMA, MALIGNANT |
(50)
3 (6%) 2 (4%) 1 (2%) |
(50)
2 (4%) |
(50) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 6 (12%) |
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*NASAL CAVITY SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA, INVASIV |
(50)
|
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
*LUNG CARCINOSARCOMA, METASTATIC MESOTHELIOMA, METASTATIC |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
HEMATOPOIETIC SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*MULTIPLE ORGANS MALIGNANT LYMPHOMA, NOS MALIG.LYMPHOMA, LYMPHOCYTIC TYPE MALIG.LYMPHOMA, HISTIOCYTIC TYPE LEUKEMIA, NOS LYMPHOCYTIC LEUKEMIA
|
(50) 1 (2%)
1 (2%) 4 (8%) 19 (38%) |
(50)
1 (2%)
1 (2%)
|
(50)
3 (6%) |
*SPLEEN FIBROSARCOMA |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) 2 (4%) |
*CERVICAL LYMPH NODE ASTROCYTOMA, METASTATIC |
(47) |
(41) (2%) |
(41) |
*MESENTERIC L. NODE MALIG.LYMPHOMA, HISTIOCYTIC TYPE |
(47) |
(45) |
(41) 1 (2%) |
CIRCULATORY SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*MULTIPLE ORGANS ANGIOSARCOMA |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
*SPLEEN HEMANGIOSARCOMA |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*LIVER NEOPLASTIC NODULE HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA |
(50) 5 (10%) 1 (2%) |
(50) 10 (20%) |
(50) 30 (60%) 2 (4%) |
*PANCREAS ACINAR-CELL ADENOMA |
(50) |
(48) |
(46) 1 (2%) |
*CARDIAC STOMACH SQUAMOUS CELL PAPILLOMA LEIOMYOSARCOMA |
(50)
1 (2%) |
(50) |
(49) 2 (4%) |
*JEJUNUM LEIOMYOMA |
(47) |
(45) |
(47) 1 (2%) |
*ILEUM ADENOCARCINOMA, NOS PAPILLARY ADENOCARCINOMA |
(47) |
(45) 1 (2%) |
(47) 1 (2%) |
*COLON ADENOMATOUS POLYP, NOS |
(50) |
(48) |
(47) 1 (2%) |
URINARY SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*KIDNEY TUBULAR-CELL ADENOMA |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
*KIDNEY/PELVIS TRANSITIONAL-CELL PAPILLOMA |
(50)
|
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
*URINARY BLADDER TRANSITIONAL-CELL PAPILLOMA |
(47) |
(46) |
(45) 1 (2%) |
ENDOCRINE SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*PITUITARY CARCINOMA,NOS ADENOMA, NOS CHROMOPHOBE ADENOMA |
(44)
1 (2%) 5 (11%) |
(45) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 5 (11%) |
(43)
4 (9%) |
*ADRENAL CORTICAL ADENOMA PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA GANGLIONEUROBLASTOMA |
(50)
6 (12%)
|
(49)
6 (12%) |
(50) 1 (2%) 6 (12%) 1 (2%) |
*ADRENAL MEDULLA GANGLIONEUROBLASTOMA |
(50) |
(49) 2 (4%) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
*THYROID C-CELL CARCINOMA |
(50) 3 (6%) |
(49) 4 (8%) |
(50) 2 (4%) |
*PANCREATIC ISLETS ISLET-CELL ADENOMA ISLET-CELL CARCINOMA |
(50) 4 (8%) |
(48) 3 (6%) |
(46) 1 (2%) |
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*MAMMARY GLAND ADENOMA, NOS FIBROADENOMA |
(50) 2 (4%)
|
(50) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) |
(50) 1 (2%)
|
*PREPUTIAL GLAND CARCINOMA,NOS ADENOMA, NOS |
(50) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) |
(50) 1 (2%)
|
(50) 1 (2%) |
*PROSTATE PAPILLARY ADENOMA |
(48)
|
(42) 2 (5%) |
(47) |
*TESTIS INTERSTITIAL-CELL TUMOR |
(50) 48 (96%) |
(50) 46 (92%) |
(50) 47 (94%) |
NERVOUS SYSTEM |
|
|
|
*BRAIN/MENINGES GRANULAR-CELL TUMOR, NOS |
(50) |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
*BRAIN ASTROCYTOMA |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
*CEREBELLUM ASTROCYTOMA |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
MEDULLA OBLONGATA GRANULAR-CELL TUMOR, NOS |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
(50) |
SPECIAL SENSE ORGANS NONE |
|
|
|
MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM NONE |
|
|
|
BODY CAVITIES |
|
|
|
*TUNICA VAGINALIS MESOTHELIOMA, NOS |
(50) |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
ALL OTHER SYSTEMS |
|
|
|
*MULTIPLE ORGANS MESOTHELIOMA, MALIGNANT |
(50) 1 (2%) |
(50) |
(50) |
ORBITAL REGION SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA, INVASIV |
|
|
|
ANIMAL DISPOSITION SUMMARY |
|
|
|
ANIMALS INITIALLY IN STUDY NATURAL DEATHS MORIBUND SACRIFICE SCHEDULED SACRIFICE ACCIDENTALLY KILLED TERMINAL SACRIFICE ANIMAL MISSING |
50 14 8
28 |
50 12 4
34
|
50 11 5
34 |
TUMOR SUMMARY |
|
|
|
TOTAL ANIMALS WITH PRIMARY TUMORS* TOTAL PRIMARY TUMORS |
50 112 |
48 97 |
49 120 |
TOTAL ANIMALS WITH BENIGN TUMORS TOTAL BENIGN TUMORS |
49 71 |
46 71 |
49 73 |
TOTAL ANIMALS WITH MALIGNANT TUMORS TOTAL MALIGNANT TUMORS |
28 35 |
13 15 |
14 16 |
TOTAL ANIMALS WITH SECONDARY TUMORS TOTAL SECONDARY TUMORS |
1 1 |
2 2 |
1 2 |
TOTAL ANIMALS WITH TUMORS UNCERTAINBENIGN OR MALIGNANT TOTAL UNCERTAIN TUMORS |
6 6 |
11 11 |
30 31 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- 37.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- chronic
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is from Klimisch 2 and from peer-reviewed journal.
Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Carcinogenicity: via dermal route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the data available for target 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (CAS no 842-07-9) is considered to be carcinogenic by oral route of exposure.
Additional information
Carcinogenicity:
Based on the data available for target 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) (CAS no 842-07-9) is summarized below
In a study conducted by National Toxicology Program (1982), Combined Chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity was evaluated in Fischer F344/N male and female rats by using 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) in the concentration of 0, 37.5 and 75 mg/kg bw/day orally in feed. In male rats, 34/50 (68%) of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day and 34/50 (68%) of 75 mg/kg bw /day lived till 104 weeks. In female rats, 42/49 (86%) of 37.5 mg/kg bw/day and 38/50 (76%) of 75 mg/kg bw /day lived till at 104 weeks. No significant differences in survival were observed in treated rats as compared to control. No compound-related clinical signs and effects on feed consumption were observed as compared to control. After week 16 for males and after week 50 for females mean body weights were decreased in treated rats as compared to control. In addition, non-neoplastic: multifocal fibrosis of the cardiac valve, atrophy of the pancreatic animus and nephropathy in male and female rat, lymphoid hyperplasia of the lung in male rats and bile duct focal hyperplasia in female rats were observed when treated with 37.5 and 75 mg/kg bw/day as compared to control. A variety of other nonneoplastic lesions were seen in dosed rats. These were the usual types seen in aging F344 rats (Goodman et al., 1979) and were not considered to be associated with chemical administration. Increase in Neoplastic nodules of the liver, composed of eosinophilic or basophilic hepatocytes and were accompanied by an angiectactic or cystic change were observed in treated male and female rats as compared to control. Dose related Basophilic and clear cell changes were also generally observed in treated rats. Therefore, Carcinogenic LOAEL was considered to be 37.5 mg/kg bw/day when F344/N male and female rats were treated with 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) orally in feed for 103 weeks.
Thus, based on the data available for target 1-phenylazo-2-naphthol (C. I. Solvent Yellow 14) (CAS no 842-07-9) is considered to be carcinogenic by oral route of exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.