Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-332-1 | CAS number: 10124-37-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- February 22 - 25, 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- In the interest of animal welfare and to minimize any testing likely to produce severe responses in animals, a weight of evidence analysis was performed, prior to the start of this in vivo eye irritation study in the rabbit. As recommended in the test guidelines, all available information was evaluated (e.g. existing human and animal data, literature, substance data supplied by the sponsor, analysis of structure activity relationships (SAR), physicochemical properties and reactivity (pH, buffering capacity) and in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo tests) to determine the need for in vivo eye testing.
Based on the available information, it was concluded that there is need to perform this in vivo eye irritation study in rabbit in order to establish the possible eye irritating properties of the test substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 011
- Report date:
- 2011
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2400 (Acute Eye Irritation)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (JMAFF), 12 Nousan, Notification No 8147, November 2000, including the most recent partial revisions.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- calcium dinitrate tetrahydrate
- EC Number:
- 603-865-8
- Cas Number:
- 13477-34-4
- Molecular formula:
- Ca(NO3)2*4H20
- IUPAC Name:
- calcium dinitrate tetrahydrate
- Test material form:
- solid: flakes
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate
- Substance type: White flakes
- Physical state: Solid
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River France, L’Arbresle Cedex, France
- Age at study initiation: Animals used within the study were at least 6 weeks old *
- Weight at study initiation: body weights were at least 1.0 kg *.
- Housing: Individually housed in labeled cages with perforated floors (Ebeco, Germany, dimensions 67 x 62 x 55 cm) and shelters (Ebeco, Germany, dimensions 40 x 32 x 23 cm).
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Pelleted diet for rabbits (Global Diet 2030 from Harlan Teklad®, Mucedola, Milanese, Italy) approximately 100 grams per day. Hay (TecniLab-BMI BV, Someren, The Netherlands) and wooden sticks (Swedish aspen wood, Uden, The Netherlands) were available during the study period.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Free access to tap water.
- Acclimatization period: at least 5 days before start of treatment under laboratory conditions.
* Animal specifications (sex, age and body weight) are specified in the attached table.
A health inspection was performed prior to commencement of treatment, to ensure that the animals were in a good state of health. Special attention was paid to the eyes, which were free from any abnormality.
Results of analysis for diet (nutrients and contaminants), hay and water were assessed and did not reveal any findings that were considered to have affected the study integrity. All certificates and results of analysis are retained in the NOTOX archives.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18.9 - 19.4
- Humidity (%): 47 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN LIFE DATES: 22 February 2011
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: One eye of the animal remained untreated and served as the reference control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 98.2 mg (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL)
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single instillation on Day 1.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- The eyes of each animal were examined approximately 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after instillation of the test substance
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 1 male
- Details on study design:
- STUDY DESIGN
The study was performed in a stepwise manner and was started by treatment of a single rabbit (sentinel). Based on the severity of the ocular lesions observed during the study, the animal was sacrificed for ethical reasons immediately after the 72 hours observation and the two further rabbits assigned to the study were not treated.
TREATMENT
On test Day 1, the test substance was instilled in the conjunctival sac of an eye of one animal after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The lids were then gently held together for about one second to prevent loss of the test substance. The other eye remained untreated and served as the reference control.
Immediately after the 24-hour observation, a solution of 2% fluorescein (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in water (adjusted to pH 7.0) was instilled into both eyes of the animal to quantitatively determine corneal epithelial damage. This procedure was repeated to assess recovery. Any bright green stained area, indicating epithelial damage, was estimated as a percentage of the total corneal area.
After the final observation, the animal was sacrificed by intra-venous injection of Euthasol® 20% (AST Farma BV, Oudewater, The Netherlands).
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
-Washing (if done): No
OBSERVATIONS
- Mortality/Viability: Twice daily.
- Toxicity: At least once daily.
- Body Weight: Day of treatment (prior to instillation) and at termination of the study.
- Necropsy: No necropsy was performed according to protocol.
- Irritation:
The irritation scores and a description of all other (local) effects were recorded.The irritation was assessed according to the following numerical scoring system. At each observation, the highest scores given were recorded:
CORNEAL IRRITATION
Opacity: degree of density (area most dense taken for reading)
0: No ulceration or opacity (may include slight dulling of normal luster)
1: Scattered or diffuse areas of opacity, details of iris clearly visible
2: Easily discernible translucent area, details of iris slightly obscured
3: Nacreous area, no details of iris visible, size of pupil barely discernible
4: Opaque cornea, iris not discernible through the opacity
Area of cornea involved:
0: No ulceration or opacity
1: One quarter or less but not zero
2: Greater than one quarter, but less than half
3: Greater than half, but less than three quarters
4: Greater than three quarters, up to whole area
IRIS
0: Normal
1: Markedly deepened rugae, congestion, swelling, moderate circumcorneal hyperaemia, or injection, any of these or combination thereof, iris still reacting to light (sluggish reaction is positive)
2: No reaction to light, hemorrhage, gross destruction (any or all of these)
CONJUNCTIVAL IRRITATION
Redness (refers to palpebrae and sclera, excluding cornea and iris):
0: Blood vessels normal
1: Some blood vessels definitely hyperaemic (injected)
2: Diffuse, crimson color, individual vessels not easily discernible
3: Diffuse beefy red
Chemosis (refers to lids and/or nictitating membranes):
0: No swelling
1: Any swelling above normal (includes nictitating membranes)
2: Obvious swelling with partial eversion of lids
3: Swelling with lids about half closed
4: Swelling with lids more than half closed
Discharge:
0: No discharge (may include small amounts observed in inner canthus of normal animals)
1: Any amount different from normal and/or lacrimation
2: Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs just adjacent to lids
3: Discharge with moistening of the lids and hairs (considerable area around the eye)
Where standard lighting was considered inadequate for observing minor effects, eye examinations were performed using an ophthalmic examination lamp.
In cases of equivocal results when comparing the treated and untreated eyes, the illustrated guide from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, D.C. 20207 was used for additional control purposes.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: outside of the eyelids were red and swollen
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: outside of the eyelids were red and swollen
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: outside of the eyelids were red and swollen
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Remarks:
- (redness)
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 3
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 72 hours
- Remarks on result:
- other: outside of the eyelids were red and swollen
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Instillation of 98.2 mg of CALCIUM NITRATE TETRAHYDRATE (a volume of approximately 0.1 mL) into an eye of one rabbit resulted in effects on the cornea, iris and conjunctivae. The corneal injury consisted of opacity (maximum grade 2) and epithelial damage (maximum 100% of the corneal area). The corneal injury did not diminish within 72 hours. Iridial irritation grade 1 was observed and did not resolve within 72 hours. The irritation of the conjunctivae consisted of redness (grade 3), chemosis (grade 4) and discharge (grade 3) and did not diminish within 72 hours. In addition the outside of the eye lids were red and swollen during the observation period.
Due to the severity of effects and no signs of recovery, the animal was sacrificed after the 72-hour observation for ethical reasons. No further animals were treated.
Individual and mean eye irritation scores are specified in the attached table. - Other effects:
- No staining of (peri) ocular tissues by the test substance was observed and no test substance remnants were seen.
No symptoms of systemic toxicity were observed in the animal during the test period and no mortality occurred.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye)
- Remarks:
- Classified as Category 1 according to Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
- Conclusions:
- Based on the degree and persistence of the corneal injury, it was concluded that severe ocular damage had occurred by instillation of CALCIUM NITRATE TETRAHYDRATE into the rabbit eye in one animal.
Based on these results:
- according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2007), CALCIUM NITRATE TETRAHYDRATE should be classified as: having irreversible effects on the eyes (Category 1).
- according to the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, CALCIUM NITRATE TETRAHYDRATE should be classified as Irreversible effects on the eye (Category 1) and labeled as H318: Causes serious eye damage. - Executive summary:
Acute eye irritation/corrosion study with Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate in the rabbit according to OECD 405 guideline and GLP principles.
Instillation of the test substance resulted in effects on the cornea, iris and conjunctivae. The corneal injury consisted of opacity (maximum grade 2) and epithelial damage (maximum 100% of the corneal area). The corneal injury did not diminish within 72 hours. Iridial irritation grade 1 was observed and did not resolve within 72 hours.
The irritation of the conjunctivae consisted of redness (grade 3), chemosis (grade 4) and discharge (grade 3) and did not diminish within 72 hours. In addition the outside of the eye lids were red and swollen during the observation period.
No staining of (peri) ocular tissues by the test substance was observed and no test substance remnants were seen.
Based on these results Calcium nitrate tetrahydrate should be classified as Irreversible effects on the eye (Category 1) and labeled as H318: Causes serious eye damage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.