Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-532-0 | CAS number: 96-76-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Ecotoxicological Summary
Administrative data
Hazard for aquatic organisms
Freshwater
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 0.001 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 50
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
- PNEC freshwater (intermittent releases):
- 0.004 mg/L
Marine water
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC aqua (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 500
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
STP
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC STP
- PNEC value:
- 0.1 mg/L
- Assessment factor:
- 100
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Sediment (freshwater)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (freshwater)
- PNEC value:
- 0.661 mg/kg sediment dw
- Extrapolation method:
- equilibrium partitioning method
Sediment (marine water)
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC sediment (marine water)
- PNEC value:
- 0.066 mg/kg sediment dw
- Extrapolation method:
- equilibrium partitioning method
Hazard for air
Air
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Hazard for terrestrial organisms
Soil
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC soil
- PNEC value:
- 1.2 mg/kg soil dw
- Assessment factor:
- 10
- Extrapolation method:
- assessment factor
Hazard for predators
Secondary poisoning
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- PNEC oral
- PNEC value:
- 33.33 mg/kg food
- Assessment factor:
- 90
Additional information
Effects on Aquatic Organisms
Micro-organisms
A 3 hour respiration inhibition study carried out according to OECD 209 was used to assess the effect of 2,4-DTBP on STP micro-organisms. An EC50 of >10 mg/l was determined (no NOEC was determined). According to the TGD an AF of 100 should be applied to derive a PNECSTP of 0.10 mg/l.
Species |
Endpoint |
Comments |
Reference |
Activated sludge respiration inhibition testing |
EC50= >10 mg/l |
Key Study |
Sewell I.G. (1991) Activated sludge respiration inhibition test, Safepharm Laboratories Ltd., Derby, UK, SI Group, Report No. S0052/E349 |
Inhibition of bacterial O2consumption (mean) = 1711 mg/l
EC10could not be established. |
Supporting Study |
Schöberl P. (1991) Bestimmung der Bakterientoxizität von 2,4-di-tert.-Butylphenol im Sauerstoff-Konsumptions-Test (Huels Methode), Huels AG, Sasol Germany GmbH, Report No. SK-91/2 |
Water compartment
The current strategy for deriving a protective PNECwater, outlined in the Technical Guidance Document for risk assessment (2003), indicates that the appropriate assessment factor should be applied to the lowest acute L(E)C50value obtained from toxicity testing in fish, aquatic invertebrate and algal species. In the event that chronic toxicity data are available from three separate trophic levels, the lowest NOEC value is used with an assessment factor of 10 applied for fresh water and 100 applied for marine water.
Detailed below is an assessment of the available data ecotoxicological data together with recommendations for the endpoints which should be used to determine the Predicted No Effect Concentration for 2,4-DTBP in the fresh water environment (PNECfreshwater) and marine environment (PNECmarinewater):-
Fish
Two studies were conducted in fish using 2,4-DTBP; a rainbow trout 96h study and a Golden ide 48h study. The LC50from the rainbow trout was found to be greater than the highest value tested and is therefore not considered appropriate for setting the PNEC. The second study conducted using Golden ide is also not considered appropriate for setting the PNEC as the study was performed over 48h and not 96h, and the test species is not a standard species as defined in the OECD Guideline 203. It was therefore considered more appropriate to read across to the studies conducted using 2,6-DTBP.
Four studies were conducted in fish. Two acute studies (rainbow trout and zebra fish) and two prolonged toxicity tests (14 days; rainbow trout and fathead minnows). From the 14 day studies conducted in fathead minnows and rainbow trout it was also possible to determine 96 h LC50values thereby satisfying the requirements of an acute toxicity test. Due to a poor dose response relationship the results from the 14 day prolonged toxicity test with rainbow trout were considered to have lower reliability than the fathead minnow results.
The two rainbow trout 96h LC50 results were greater than the highest value tested. The 96 h LC50 fathead minnow result therefore represents the lowest and most accurate result for basing the PNEC.
There were no long-term fish studies.
Species |
Endpoint |
Comments |
Reference |
Fish toxicity |
LC50in Golden ide(48h) = 1.8 mg/l |
Non-standard species and time period |
Scholz N. (1987) Bestimmung der akuten Wirkungen von 2,4-di-tert-Butylphenol gegenüber Fischen, Huels AG, Sasol Germany GmbH, Report No. F 786 |
96 h LC50in rainbow trout = >0.10 mg a.i./L |
Highest value tested |
Sewell I.G. (1991) Acute toxicity to rainbow trout, Safepharm laboratories Ltd., Derby, UK, SI Group, Report No. 47/1594 |
|
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 96 h LC50in rainbow trout = >1.0 mg a.i./L |
Highest value tested-no effects found |
Sewell I.G. (1991) Acute toxicity to rainbow trout, Safepharm laboratories Ltd., Derby, UK, SI Group, Report No. 47/1612 |
|
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 96 h LC50in zebra fish = 13 mg/L LC0 (96 h) = 10 mg/L |
nominal concentrations |
Rufli H. (1987) Report on the test for acute toxicity of TK 12891 to Zebra fish, OECD-Guideline No. 203 Paris (1984), US EPA OTS 86-870000305, Ciba-Geigy Ltd., Report No. 87 40 50 |
|
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 96 h LC50in rainbow trout = >0.10 mg a.i./L |
Highest value tested |
Surprenant D.C. (1989) Acute Toxicity of 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol to Rainbow Trout (Salmo gairdneri) during a 14-day flow-through exposure, Springborn Life Sciences, Albemarle, Report No. 89-05-2948 |
|
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 14 day LC50Rainbow Trout = 0.74 mg/l |
|
||
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 96 h LC50in fathead minnows = 1.4 mg a.i./L |
KEY STUDY |
Surprenant D.C. (1989) Acute toxicity of 2,6-di-tert-butylphenol to fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) during a 14-day flow-through exposure, Springborn Life Sciences, Inc., Albemarle, Report No. 86-12-2876 |
|
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 7 day LC50fathead minnows = 1.1 mg/l |
|
||
Read across to 2,6-DTBP 14 day LC50fathead minnows = 1 mg/l |
|
Invertebrates
Species |
Endpoint |
Comments |
Reference |
Invertebrate toxicity |
48 h EC50in Daphnids = 0.50 mg a.i./L NOEC = 0.20 mg a.i./L |
KEY STUDY |
Lebertz H. (2001)Study on the acute toxicity towards Daphnia of 2,4,di-tert-Butylphenol, Institut Fresenius Chemische un Biologische laboratorien AG, Taunusstein, Germany, SI Group/Sasol, Report No. IF-202/24135-00 |
Daphnids were found to be more sensitive than fish with an endpoint of 0.50 mg a.i./L.
As a result of a testing proposal, a chronic Daphnia magna study was conducted on 2,4 -DTBP:
Species |
Endpoint |
Comments |
Reference |
Invertebrate toxicity | 21 d NOEC = 0.1 mg a.i./L | KEY STUDY | Migchielsen M. (2014) Daphnia magna, reproduction test with 2,4-di-tert-butylphenol (flow-through), WIL Research Europe B.V., Report No. 503526 |
Aquatic Plants
Species |
Endpoint |
Comments |
Reference |
Algal toxicity | ErC50in Algae = 0.37 mg/l NOErC = 0.073 mg/l |
KEY STUDY LOWEST ENDPOINT |
Hafner, C. (2010) Algae, Growth Inhibition Test with 2,4-di-tert-Butylphenol according to OECD 201 (March 23rd, 2006) |
Algae were shown to be the most sensitive aquatic species (ErC50= 0.37 mg/l; NOErC = 0.073 mg/l)and will therefore be used to derive the PNEC.
Summary Water Compartment
From the aquatic tests described above, the proposed PNECfreshwater 0.00146 mg a.i./L,is based on the most sensitive species which was found to be algae with an assessment factor of 50 (2 long-term tests available). The proposed PNECmarinewater 0.000146 mg a.i./L, is based on the application of an additional assessment factor of 10 to the assessment factor of 50 applied to the NOEC value obtained in the algae toxicity study.
Sediment
A PNECsediment,freshwater has been determined using the equilibrium partitioning method based on the PNECfreshwater derived above in accordance with the TGD (equation 70).
Where:-
RHOsusp=
1150 kg/m3
PNECfreshwater= 0.00146 mg/l
Ksusp-water= 113 m3/m3(calculated using
TGD equation 24)
PNECsediment,freshwater= 0.144 mg/kg wwt (0.661 mg/kg dwt)
A PNECsediment,marinehas been determined using the equilibrium partitioning method based on the PNECwaterderived above in accordance with the TGD (equation 70).
Where:-
RHOsusp=
1150 kg/m3
PNECmarinewater= 0.000146 mg/l
Ksusp-water= 113 m3/m3(calculated using
TGD equation 24)
PNECsediment,marine= 0.0144
mg/kg wwt (0.0661 mg/kg dwt)
Terrestrial Compartment
A PNECsoil has been determined using the respective assessment factor for the derivation of PNECsoil based on available long-term data for three species of three trophic levels in accordance with the Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment Chapter R.10 (Table R.10 -10).
Terrestrial microorganisms
Species | Endpoint | Comments | Reference |
Toxicity to microorganisms | 28d-NOEC = 49.4 mg/kg dw | KEY STUDY | Tunink A (2015) |
The effects of 2,4 -DTBP were also tested on the microbial community as a third terrestrial trophic level. Effects were determined as the percent inhibition on Day 28, based on nitrate concentration, 25.9, -1.2, -1.2, -2.4, and -0.4% in the 1,000, 49.4, 2.49, 0.125, and 0.00619 μg/g treatments, respectively. The derived effect values EC50, EC25, and NOEC are >1000µg/g, ~1000µg/g and 49.4 µg/g, respectively.
Terrestrial plants
Species | Endpoint | Comments | Reference |
Toxicity to six mono- and dicot species | 21d-EC20 in oat = 13.1 mg/kg dw(lowest derived effect value in this study) | KEY STUDY | Lee B (2015) |
The lowest effect concentration determined in the Seedling Emergence study following OECD test guideline 208, assessing the toxicity of 2,4 -DTBP towards mono- and dicot plant species is the EC20 of 13.1 mg/kg dry soil for shoot weight reduction in oat. The lowest obtained effect concentration for shoot length is found in oat as well with an EC10 of 29 mg/kg dry weight. For both, emergence and survival, onion is the most sensitive species with a NOEC of 37.0 mg/kg dry weight. Terrestrial soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Species | Endpoint | Comments | Reference |
Toxicity to Eisenia foetida | 56d-NOEC = 12 mg/kg dw | KEY STUDY-LOWEST ENDPOINT | Aufderheide J (2015) |
The terrestrial toxicity of
2,4-di-tert-butylphenol towards soil macroorganisms was assessed in a
Survival and Reproduction Test with the Earthworm, Eisenia fetida according
to OECD test guideline 222. The NOEC and LOEC values after 56 days of
exposure for reproduction are 12 and 23 mg/kg, respectively, and hence
the NOEC is used for PNECsoil derivation.
PNECsoil derivation
Assessment Factor | 10 |
min. long term effect value | NOEC(OECD222)=12 mg/kg soil |
PNEC | 1.2 mg/kg soil |
Environmental No effect Concentrations (PNECs)
Compartment |
Value |
Units |
Microorganisms in STP |
0.10 |
mg/L |
Freshwater aquatic |
0.00146 |
mg/L |
Freshwater sediment (to be updated from partition coefficient when new efate data available) |
0.1438 |
mg/kg wwt mg/kg dwt |
Marine water |
0.000146 |
mg/L |
Marine sediment (to be updated from partition coefficient when new efate data available) |
0.01438 |
mg/kg wwt mg/kg dwt |
Terrestrial compartment |
1.2 |
mg/kg dwt |
Man via the environment (total daily intake) |
3.75 |
mg/kg bw/d |
Secondary Poisoning of Birds and Mammals |
33.33 |
mg/kg |
Conclusion on classification
According to GHS 2,4 -di-tert-butylphenol should be classified as follows:-
ACUTE CATEGORY 1
(M Factor = 1)
Hazard Phrase H400
CHRONIC CATEGORY 1
Hazard Phrase H410
(Due to Algae being <1.0 mg/l)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.