Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 265-111-0 | CAS number: 64742-11-6 A complex combination of hydrocarbons obtained as the extract from a solvent extraction process. It consists predominantly of aromatic hydrocarbons having carbon numbers predominantly in the range of C20 through C50. This stream is likely to contain 5 wt. % or more of 4- to 6-membered condensed ring aromatic hydrocarbons.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study is classified as reliable without restriction because it was conducted similar to OECD Test Guideline 406.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of study:
- Buehler test
- Justification for non-LLNA method:
- The first-choice method according to REACH Annex VII §8.3, the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay, is known to give false positive results with hydrocarbon substances.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 64742-05-8
- IUPAC Name:
- 64742-05-8
- Reference substance name:
- Light paraffinic distillate solvent extract
- IUPAC Name:
- Light paraffinic distillate solvent extract
- Test material form:
- liquid: viscous
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): API 83-16, CAS No. 64742-05-8
- Physical state: Liquid, amber
- Viscosity, SSU: 67.2 at 100°F
- API Gravity: 16.7
- Flash Point: (°F) 335
- Pour Point (°F): 20
- Aniline Point (°F): 95.5
- Sulfur, Wt %: 2.64
- Composition of test material ASTM D-2007, Wt. %:
Saturates: 29.2
Aromatics 68.6
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hazleton Dutchland, Inc., Denver, Pennsylvania
- Age at study initiation: 5 to 6 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 435 to 598 grams
- Housing: Individual cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Purina certified guinea pig chow 5026, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: At least 14 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 to 24
- Humidity (%): 37 to 62
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 04-02-1985 To: 15-03-1985
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 50% v/v mixture in paraffin oil (sensitising application)
1% v/v mixture in paraffin oil (challenge dose)
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- epicutaneous, occlusive
- Vehicle:
- paraffin oil
- Concentration / amount:
- 50% v/v mixture in paraffin oil (sensitising application)
1% v/v mixture in paraffin oil (challenge dose)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 10 animals
- Details on study design:
- RANGE FINDING TESTS: Consisted of eight guinea pigs, with each animal receiving 2 concentrations of test material. Originally administered undiluted and at 25%, 50%, and 75% v/v in paraffin oil. Because of irritation at the 25% level, additional concentrations of 10% v/v and 1% v/v were needed to determine irritation threshold. No dermal irritation resulted from the 1% v/v applications. The 10% and 25% v/v applications produced very slight irritation responses. The 25%,50%, and 75% v/v applications produced very slight to well-defined responses. Based upon these results, the test material was administered as a 50% v/v mixture (mild to moderately irritating) in paraffin oil for the sensitising applications and as 1% v/v mixture (the highest non-irritating concentration) in paraffin oil for the challenge dose.
MAIN STUDY
A. INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: 10 guinea pigs
- Control group: Paraffin oil administered undiluted (0.4mL)
- Site: Back, left anterior quadrant of prepared site on back
- Frequency of applications: One application per week for 3 weeks
- Duration: 3 weeks
- Concentrations: 50% v/v in paraffin oil
B. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: Single exposure
- Day(s) of challenge: Two weeks (14 days)
- Exposure period: 6 hours
- Test groups: Same 10 animals that received induction dose
- Control group: Dosed with test material in the same manner
- Site: Right anterior quadrant of prepared site on back
- Concentrations: 1% v/v in paraffin oil
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 hours after, 3 hours prior to the 24-hour examination, the test site of each animal was depilated for 20 minutes and washed with lukewarm water
- Challenge controls:
- 10 animals (previously untreated) were dosed with the test material mixture in the same manner as the test group.
- Positive control substance(s):
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The erythema and oedema scores during the sensitising phase ranged from 1.7 to 2.0 and 1.0 to 1.8, respectively. The erythema and oedema scores for the challenge phase are 1.0 to 2.5 and 0 to 1.5, respectively.
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 1% v/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 8
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- oedema scores were all 0.0, erythema scores ranged from 0.0 to 1.0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1% v/v. No with. + reactions: 8.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: oedema scores were all 0.0, erythema scores ranged from 0.0 to 1.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- negative control
- Dose level:
- 1% v/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 9
- Total no. in group:
- 10
- Clinical observations:
- oedema scores are all 0.0, erythema scores ranged from 0.0 to 1.0
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 1% v/v. No with. + reactions: 9.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: oedema scores are all 0.0, erythema scores ranged from 0.0 to 1.0.
- Reading:
- 1st reading
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- positive control
- Dose level:
- 0.1% v/v
- No. with + reactions:
- 20
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.1% v/v. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based upon the similar results obtained from the challenge phase and the naive control, light paraffinic distillate solvent extract is not sensitising to guinea pig skin according to EU criteria.
- Executive summary:
Light paraffinic DAE (CAS number 64742-05-8) was tested on 10 Hartley guinea pigs for sensitization in a Buehler test. The procedure used was a closed patch test closely following the Buehler test method outlined in OECD Guideline 406. The animals were divided into six groups: test group (10), naïve control group (10), vehicle control (10), positive control (20) and finally a naïve positive control group (20). In the test group (8/10) animals displayed very slight erythema; the highest reaction did not exceed the highest reaction of the naïve control animals. No reaction was observed in 2/10 animals. Animals in the naïve control group (9/10), vehicle control group (3/10), displayed very slight erythema. No reaction was seen in the rest of animals in each group. The positive control group (20/20) showed slight to severe irritation. The reactions of all animals equalled or exceeded the highest reaction observed in the naïve positive control group (4/19). Since the challenge reactions of the test animals did not exceed the highest reactions of control animals in any of the two naïve groups, it was concluded that the test substance was not sensitizing.
This study received a Klimisch score of 1 and is classified as reliable without restriction because it was conducted similar to OECD Test Guideline 406.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.