Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 404-360-3 | CAS number: 119313-12-1 CG 25-369; IRGACURE 369; TK 11-319
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Studies generally conducted to recognised training guidelines with GLP
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2006-02-07, 2006-06-06
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- (1998)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine Kinase Locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 complete culture medium supplemented with 15 % horse serum (HS), 100 U/100 pg/mL Penicillin/Streptomycin, 220 pg/mL Sodium-Pyruvate, and 1.25 U/mL Amphotericin used as antifungal.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction of liver from Wistar rats (HanIbm) induced with phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone, mixed with a solution of co-factors.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The cultures were evaluated at the following concentrations of the test item:
experiment I:
without S9 Mix: 5.0*; 10.0; 20.0; 40.0; 80.0; and 160 µg/mL
with S9 Mix: 5.0*; 10.0; 20.0; 40.0; 80.0; and 160 µg/mL
experiment II:
without S9 Mix: 1.3*; 2.5*; 5.0; 10.0; 20.0; 30.0; and 40.0 µg/mL
with S9 Mix: 5.0*; 10.0; 20.0; 40.0; 80.0; and 160 µg/mL
experiment III:
without S9 Mix: 5.0*; 10.0; 20.0; 40.0; 80.0; and 160 µg/mL
Following the expression phase of 72 hours the cultures marked with an asterisk were not continued since a minimum of only four analysable concentrations is required by the guidelines. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of vehicle: The test substance is insoluble in water - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 19.5 µg/mL (4 h); 13.0 µg/mL (24 h)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- With metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 4.5µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- PRE-TEST:
A pre-test was performed in order to determine the concentration range of the main experiments.
1xE+7 cells were exposed to each concentration of the test item for 4 and 24 hours without and 4 hours with metabolic activation. During the 4 h treatment period the serum concentration was reduced from 15 % to 3 %. Following treatment the cells were washed and finally resuspended in 30 mL complete culture medium for a 2-day growth period. The relative suspension growth (RSG) of the treated cell cultures was calculated at the end of the growth period according to the method of Clive and Spector (Mutation Research 31, 17-29, 1975).
Test item concentrations between 5.1 and 650 µg/mL were used to evaluate toxicity in the presence (4 h treatment) and absence (4 h and 24 h treatment) of metabolic activation. Relevant toxic effects were observed at 325 µg/mL and above in the absence and at 81.3 µg/mL and above in the presence of metabolic activation (4 h treatment). Following the 24 h treatment without metabolic activation toxic effects occurred at 40.6 µg/mL and above.
MAIN TEST:
Experiment I
The treatment duration in the first experiment was 4 hours with and without metabolic activation.
Experiment II
The cells were treated with test item for 4 h with and for 24 h without metabolic activation. The experimental part without metabolic activation was terminated prior to the generation of any data on mutagenicity due to exceedingly severe toxic effects even at lower concentrations. Therefore, this experimental part was repeated as experiment IIA in a lower concentration range. The data of experiment IIA are reported as experiment II without metabolic activation.
Experiment III
This experiment was performed to verify a minor increase of the mutation frequency without metabolic activation in experiment I. Experiment III was performed in the absence of metabolic activation with a treatment time of 4 hours.
All experiments were performed in duplicate. Expression time of cells in growth medium was 48 - 72 h and selection time ranged from 10 to 15 days. The selection agent was Trifluorothymidine (TFT; 5 µg/mL). The number of replications was 2 and 2.0 cells/well in a 96-well microtiter plate were evaluated.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY:
Cytotoxicity was assessed using relative total growth and cloning efficiency 1= ln(number of empty wells on plates/192)/cells seeded per well. - Evaluation criteria:
- EVALUATION OF RESULTS:
The test item is classified as mutagenic if there is a reproducible concentration-related increase in the mutation frequency. Such an evaluation may be considered independently of the enhancement factor for induced mutants.
A positive response is considered to be reproducible if it occurs in both parallel cultures.
However, in the evaluation of the test results the historical variability of the mutation rates in negative and solvent controls and the mutation rates of all negative and solvent controls of this study are taken into consideration.
Results of test groups are rejected if the relative total growth, the relative suspension growth, and/or cloning efficiency 1 is less than 10 % of the solvent control or the cloning efficiency 2 after the expression period is less than 20 %.
Whenever a test item is considered mutagenic according to the above mentioned criteria, the ratio of small versus large colonies is used to differentiate point mutations from clastogenic effects. If the increase of the mutation frequency is accompanied by a reproducible and dose dependent shift in the ratio of small versus large colonies, clastogenic effects are indicated.
ACCEPTABILITY CRITERIA:
A mutation assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
All plates, from either the cloning efficiency 2 (ln(mean number of empty wells per plate / 96) / cells seeded per well) or the TFT resistance-testing portion of the experiment are analysable.
- The absolute cloning efficiency 2 of the negative and/or solvent controls is > 0.5 (50%).
- The spontaneous mutant frequency in the negative and/or solvent controls is in the range of our historical control data
- The positive controls induce significant (at least 2-fold) increases in the mutant frequencies. The cloning efficiencies and the relative total growth are greater than 10% of the concurrent vehicle control group. - Statistics:
- A linear regression was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies using SYSTAT statistics software. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the groups treated with the test item was compared to the solvent control groups. A trend is judged as significant whenever the p-value (probability value) is below 0.05. However, both, biological and statistical significance should be considered together.
The data generated at the second precipitating concentration (160 µg/mL) are not included in the statistical evaluation. - Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- A dose dependency of mutation frequency (Exp. I and II) was not considered biologically relevant. They either were not reproduced in the parallel culture (Exp. I) or absolute values of mutation frequency remained within the historical controls.
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Toxic effects were seen in experiment II at 30 and 40 µg/ml without and 160 µg/ml with S9-mix and in experiment III (without S9-mix) at 80 µg/ml and above.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS:
Precipitation was seen at 80 µg/mL and above.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
In the mouse lymphoma assay precipitation is problematic since the cells grow in suspension. At the end of the treatment, the cells are separated from the test item by centrifugation. A precipitate is likely to contaminate the cell-pellet at the centrifugation step. Thus, arbitrary amounts of test item are carried over to the following steps of the assay leading to non-defined exposure times of up to 48 hours to selection. Toxic or seemingly mutagenic artefacts are likely to occur under these conditions. - Conclusions:
- The test material did not invoke a mutagenic response under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
In this OECD 476 test with GLP certification, mouse lymphoma cells L5178Y were treated with test article at doses up to 160 µg/mL using DMSO as a vehicle. The test design consisted of two main experiments using two parallel cultures.The cells were treated with the test item for 4 h with and without metabolic activation in the first experiment. In the second experiment the duration of treatment was 4 h with and 24 h without metabolic activation.A confirmatory experiment was added to verify mutagenicity data generated in the first experiment without metabolic activation. Experiment III was solely performed in the absence of metabolic activation under experimental conditions identical to the first experiment without metabolic activation.
Precipitation of the test item and decrease in cloning efficiency was observed at doses of 80 and 160 µg/mL. A biologically irrelevant increase in mutation frequency was observed in some dishes of the first experiment. They were not reproduced in the parallel culture and considered as artifacts caused by precipitates. An increase in mutation frequency was also observed in the second experiment (without metabolic activation, 24 h). Since absolute values of the mutation frequency remained within the historical range of negative and solvent controls, this effect was considered to be biologically irrelevant. Therefore, the test article is considered to be non-mutagenic to mammalian cells in vitro.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987-04-07, 1987-05-25
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Only four S. Typhimurium strains instead of five were used.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The experiments were performed in a room with red light illumination, in order to avoid any influence of UV-light on the test material.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- his operon (All strains are histidine-auxotrophic mutants)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 0.3 mL S9 fraction of liver from rats (Tif: RAIf(SPF)) induced with Aroclor 1254 and 0.7 mL of a solution of cofactors.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 20, 78, 313, 1250, and 5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: acetone
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test article is insoluble in water - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: Daunorubicin-HCl
- Remarks:
- strain TA 98: 5 and 10 µg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- strain TA 100: 0.125 and 0.25 µg/plate
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- strain TA 1535: 2.5 and 5.0 µg/plate
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- strain TA 1537: 50 and 100 µg/plate
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 1537: 5 µg/plate
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- strain TA 1535: 250 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
In a preliminary toxicity test with strain TA 100 without metabolic activation (plate incorporation), nine concentrations of test article ranging from 0.08 to 5000 µg/plate were tested to determine the highest concentration to be used in the mutagenicity assay.
MUTAGENICITY TEST
All experiments were performed in triplicate. The test was performed as agar plate incorporation test for 48 h in the dark at 37 +/- 1.5 °C. The selection based on growth in absence of histidine. - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is considered to be positive when:
- at least a reproducible doubling of the mean number of revertants per plate above that of the negative control at any concentration level for one or more of the following strains: TA 98, TA 1535 and TA 1537;
- a reproducible increase of the mean number of revertants per plate for any concentration above that of the negative control by at least a factor of 1.5 for strain TA 100.
Generally a concentration-related effect should be demonstrable.
A test is considered acceptable if the mean colony counts of the control values of all strains are within the acceptable ranges and if the results of the positive controls meet the criteria for a positive response. - Statistics:
- Arithmetic mean and standard deviation
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: At the concentrations of 313 µg/plate and above the test article precipitated in soft agar.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: Table 1. - Conclusions:
- The test material did not invoke a mutagenic response under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
In this study (OECD 471) conducted to generally accepted scientific standards with GLP, first a preliminary toxicity test with strain TA 100 (without metabolic activation) of the test material (EC 404-360-3) was conducted. Nine concentrations from 0.08 to 5000 µg/plate were tested without metabolic activation in order to determine the concentrations to be used for the main test.
For the main test, five concentrations ranging from 20 -5000 µg/plate (with a 0 µg/plate for control) were tested on different strains of Salmonella typhimurium with and without metabolic activation provided by rats' livers using acetone as a vehicle. Stastically, no mutagenic activity was observed over the duration of the test compared to the controls, thus according to the CLP regulation 1272/2008, this test material is not genotoxic.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1989-11-07, 1990-02-26
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1983
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.5375 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration)
- Version / remarks:
- 1987
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1984
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: Nutrient Mixture F-12 supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum + Penicillin/Streptomycin 100 units / mL / 100 µg / mL (Gibco AG, Basle, Switzerland).
- Properly maintained: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- 0.15 mL S9 fraction of liver from rats (Tif: RAIf(SPF)) induced with Aroclor 1254 and 0.2 mL of a solution of cofactors in 0.65 mL medium.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- ORIGINAL STUDY
Experiment 1, 2, 3, 4, 5: 1.72, 3.44, 6.88, 13.75, 27.5, 55.0, 110.0, 220.0 µg/ml
CONFIRMATORY STUDY
Experiment 1, 2: 13.75, 27.5, 55.0, 110.0, 220.0 µg/ml
Experiment 3: 6.88, 13.75, 27.5, 55.0, 110.0 µg/ml
Experiment 4: 0.86, 1.72, 3.44, 6.88, 13.75 µg/ml
For further details see table 1. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test substance is insoluble in water - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Without metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- Migrated to IUCLID6: 0.1 and 0.04 µg/mL
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- 0.15 mL S9 fraction of liver from RAI rats induced with Aroclor 1254 and 0.2 mL of a solution of cofactors and 0.65 ml medium. Migrated to IUCLID6: 40.0 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
Preincubation period of cells: 24 - 57 h
Exposure scenario in the original study:
Experiment 1: with activation, Duration of treatment: 3 hours, Recovery: 14 hours
Experiment 2: with activation, Duration of treatment: 3 hours, Recovery: 21 hours
Experiment 3: without activation, Duration of treatment: 14 hours, Recovery: 0 hours
Experiment 4: without activation, Duration of treatment: 24 hours, Recovery: 0 hours
Experiment 5: without activation. Duration of treatment: 48 hours, Recovery: 0 hours
Exposure scenario in the confirmatory study:
Experiment 1: with activation, Duration of treatment: 3 hours, Recovery: 14 hours
Experiment 2: with activation, Duration of treatment: 3 hours, Recovery: 21 hours
Experiment 3: without activation, Duration of treatment: 14 hours, Recovery: 0 hours
Experiment 4: without activation, Duration of treatment: 24 hours, Recovery: 0 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays):
Colcemid 0.4 µg/mL
NUMBER OF METAPHASE EVALUATED:
200 in treatment groups, 50 in positive controls
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:
2000
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY (performed as integral part of the mutagenicity test by mitotic index)
For the determination of the mitotic index the preparations from the various cultures were examined first, uncoded. The percentages of mitotic suppression in comparison with the controls were evaluated by counting at least 2000 cells per concentration.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: Yes - Evaluation criteria:
- 200 metaphase figures with 19 to 21 chromosomes from cultures of two falcon flasks in the vehicle control and in the treated groups, and at least 50 metaphase cells in the positive controls were examined for the following aberrations:
a) specific aberrations: breaks, exchanges, deletions, fragments
b) unspecific aberrations: gaps, premature chromosome condensation, and chromosome decay
c) numerical aberrations (metaphases with >21 chromosomes) will be registered, yet reported only in case of deviations. - Statistics:
- A test substance is considered to be active in this test system if in comparison to the negative control a marked increase in the number of specific chromosomal aberrations appears or if an increased number of exchange figures appear together with a high number of other specific chromosomal aberrations such as breaks and fragments.
A concentration-related response in the number of aberrations should be demonstrable. - Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- Chromosome aberration and polyploidy
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- mitotic index decrease (table 2).
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- REMARK
In the original study, in all experiments performed, the number of cells with specific chromosomal aberrations in the treatment groups showed no marked increase in comparison with the negative control. The incidence of changes observed is within the range of spontaneous aberrations inherent in this particular cell line used as compared to the historical data. The confirmatory study confirmed the results of the original study.
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Water solubility: TK 11319 is insoluble
- Precipitation: Addition of the stock solutions to the cell cultures produced turbidity in the media at the final concentrations of 220.0 and 110.0 µg/mL without and with activation.
- Remarks on result:
- other: strain/cell type: CHO-K1 CCL61
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- The test material did not invoke a mutagenic response under the conditions of the test.
- Executive summary:
In this OECD 473 test with GLP compliance, chinese hamster ovary cells CCL61 were treated with test article at doses up to 220 µg/ml using DMSO as a vehicle. The original test design consisted of five main experiments using two parallel cultures. The cells were treated with the test item for 3 h with metabolic activation and a recovery time of 14 hours and 21 hours (experiments 1 and 2 respectively). For experiments 3 -5, the treatment was with no metabolic activation or recovery time, and the durations of the treatments were 14 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours respectively.
A confirmatory experiment was added to verify data generated in the first set of experiments at doses up to 220 µg/ml
. These additional experiments were performed with metabolic activation with a treatment duration of three hours (experiments 1 and 2) and a recovery period of 14 and 21 hours (experiments 1 and 2 respectively). Experiments were also performed without metabolic activation with a treatment duration of 14 and 24 hours (experiments 3 and 4 respectively) without a recovery period.
In the original study, in all experiments performed, the number of cells with specific chromosomal aberrations in the treatment groups showed no marked increase in comparison with the negative control. The incidence of changes observed is within the range of spontaneous aberrations inherent in this particular cell line used as compared to the historical data. The confirmatory study confirmed the results of the original study. Thus according to this study, EC 404 -360 -3 is not genotoxic.
Referenceopen allclose all
General Remarks
Toxicity
Relevant toxic effects, indicated by relative cloning efficiency 1 or a relative total growth of less than 50 % in both parallel cultures, were observed in the second experiment at 30 and 40 μg/mL without metabolic activation and at 160 μg/mL with metabolic activation. In the third experiment relevant toxic effects were noted in the precipitating range at 80 μg/mL and above.
In the experimental parts using 4 hour treatment, the dose range was limited by the solubility of the test item. Two precipitating concentrations were analyased. In the experimental part using continuous treatment for 24 hours without metabolic activation (experiment II), cytotoxic effects were dose limiting.
Mutagenicity
The data with metabolic activation do not indicate a possible mutagenic potential of the test item. Generally elevated but not dose dependent levels of the mutation frequency observed in the first culture of the first experiment with metabolic activation were based on the relatively low solvent control. Compared to the corresponding negative control no relevant increase occurred.
The data generated in the absence of metabolic activation with a treatment period of 4 hours showed an isolated increase of the mutation frequency at the maximum concentration of 160 μg/mL in the presence of precipitation.
Following 24 hours of treatment, no increase at all was noted even at severely cytotoxic concentrations in the soluble range. The increase at precipitating concentrations occurred in the second culture of the first experiment without metabolic activation and in the first culture of the third experiment. The threshold of twice the colony count of the corresponding solvent control was exceeded. No comparable increase occurred in the parallel cultures under identical conditions. Both of the increased levels of the mutation frequency are judged as biologically irrelevant precipitation artifacts.
Controls
In this study the range of the negative and solvent controls was from 34 up to 209 mutant colonies per 106cells; the range of the groups treated with the test item was from 32 up to 538 mutant colonies per 106 cells. Both solvent controls did not quite reach the historical range of solvent controls in the second experiment without metabolic activation. However, this effect was judged as biologically irrelevant fluctuation since both corresponding negative controls remained within the range of historical negative controls.
Statistics
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies using SYSTAT® statistics software. The data generated at the second precipitating concentration of 160 μg/mL are not included in the statistical evaluation. A significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of <0.05 was determined in experiment I culture I with and without metabolic activation. In experiment II such a trend was observed in both cultures without metabolic activation. However, the significant trends mentioned above were not considered biologically relevant since they either were not reproduced in the parallel culture (experiment I) or the absolute values of the mutation frequency remained within the historical range of negative and solvent controls (experiment II).
Table 2. Summary of results.
conc. μg/mL | S9 mix | relative cloning efficiency 1 | relative total growth | mutant colonies/ 106 cells | induction factor | relative cloning efficiency 1 | relative total growth | mutant colonies/ 106 cells | induction factor | |
Column | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Experiment 1/ 4 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||||
Neg. control wtth medium | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 148 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 103 | |||
Solv. control with DMSO | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 165 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 181 | 1.0 | |
Pos. Control with MMS | 19.5 | - | 67.7 | 25.9 | 703 | 4.8 | 49.2 | 25.6 | 449 | 4.3 |
Test item | 5.0 | - | 112.8 | culture was not continued* | 106.6 | culture was not continued* | ||||
Test item | 10.0 | - | 108.2 | 151.2 | 90 | 0.5 | 101.6 | 61.3 | 387 | 2.1 |
Test item | 20.0 | - | 106.0 | 112.5 | 117 | 0.7 | 79.8 | 55.3 | 261 | 1.4 |
Test item | 40.0 | - | 94.6 | 107.5 | 169 | 1.0 | 104.9 | 70.6 | 262 | 1.4 |
Test item | 80.0 (p) | - | 71.7 | 85.8 | 217 | 1.3 | 122.4 | 60.1 | 292 | 1.6 |
Test Item | 160.0 (p) | - | 56.8 | 72.5 | 280 | 1.7 | 81.0 | 44.6 | 538 | 3.0 |
Neg. control with medium | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 209 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 120 | |||
Solv. control with DMSO | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 106 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 66 | 1.0 | |
Pos. control with CPA | 4.5 | + | 49.9 | 67.8 | 703 | 3.4 | 57.0 | 69.8 | 336 | 2.8 |
Test item | 5.0 | + | 100.0 | culture was not continued* | 73.6 | culture was not continued* | ||||
Test item | 10.0 | + | 83.9 | 102.1 | 193 | 1.8 | 63.0 | 156.5 | 43 | 0.7 |
Test item | 20.0 | + | 87.0 | 84.6 | 230 | 2.2 | 79.0 | 102.7 | 73 | 1.1 |
Test item | 40.0 | + | 107.0 | 95.3 | 207 | 2.0 | 84.9 | 146.5 | 37 | 0.6 |
Test item | 80.0 (p) | + | 82.4 | 67.6 | 251 | 2.4 | 67.6 | 134.9 | 45 | 0.7 |
Test item | 160.0 (p) | + | 88.6 | 51.2 | 237 | 2.2 | 75.7 | 52.6 | 80 | 1.2 |
Experiment II / 24 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||||
Neg. control with medium | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 52 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 46 | |||
Solv. control with DMSO | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 34 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 37 | 1.0 | |
POS. Control with MMS | 13.0 | - | 35.7 | 29.2 | 756 | 14.6 | 42.8 | 19.1 | 392 | 8.5 |
Test item | 1.3 | - | 116.4 | culture was not continued* | 114.4 | culture was not continued* | ||||
Test item | 2.5 | - | 93.7 | culture was not continued* | 102.5 | culture was not continued* | ||||
Test item | 5.0 | - | 100.0 | 59.0 | 48 | 1.4 | 87.5 | 67.6 | 51 | 1.4 |
Test item | 10.0 | - | 95.7 | 48.7 | 69 | 2.0 | 91.3 | 72.8 | 38 | 1.1 |
Test item | 20.0 | - | 86.4 | 30.3 | 62 | 1.8 | 79.4 | 59.4 | 35 | 1.0 |
Test item | 30.0 | - | 40.6 | 27.7 | 65 | 1.9 | 43.4 | 24.2 | 65 | 1.8 |
Test item | 40.0 | - | 5.8 | 9.0 | 45 | 1.3 | 9.9 | 9.4 | 38 | 1.0 |
Experiment II / 4 h treatment | ||||||||||
Neg. control with medium | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 57 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 56 | |||
Solv. control with DMSO | + | 100.0 | 100.0 | 64 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 52 | 1.0 | |
Pos. control with CPA | 4.5 | + | 19.1 | 33.5 | 385 | 6.7 | 20.3 | 26.7 | 284 | 5.5 |
Test item | 5.0 | + | 82.4 | culture was not continued* | 124.8 | culture was not continued* | ||||
Test item | 10.0 | + | 100.0 | 141.7 | 32 | 0.5 | 77.0 | 106.6 | 60 | 1.2 |
Test item | 20.0 | + | 72.0 | 111.2 | 52 | 0.8 | 74.4 | 98.2 | 54 | 1.0 |
Test item | 40.0 | + | 73.2 | 89.4 | 51 | 0.8 | 87.8 | 62.2 | 79 | 1.5 |
Test item | 80.0 (p) | + | 73.2 | 72.6 | 42 | 0.7 | 97.7 | 93.3 | 48 | 0.9 |
Test item | 160.0 (p) | + | 36.3 | 37.4 | 46 | 0.7 | 87.8 | 42.8 | 49 | 0.9 |
Experiment III / 4 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||||
Neg. control with medium | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 196 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 144 | |||
Solv. control with DMSO | - | 100.0 | 100.0 | 144 | 1.0 | 100.0 | 100.0 | 154 | 1.0 | |
Pos. Control with MMS | 19.5 | - | 77.5 | 24.4 | 429 | 2.2 | 92.6 | 11.7 | 381 | 2.6 |
Test item | 5.0 | - | 78.8 | culture was not continued* | 103.5 | culture was not continued* | ||||
Test item | 10.0 | - | 87.9 | 85.2 | 127 | 0.9 | 83.8 | 81.2 | 182 | 1.2 |
Test item | 20.0 | - | 60.2 | 98.6 | 163 | 1.1 | 100.0 | 72.3 | 173 | 1.1 |
Test item | 40.0 | - | 62.2 | 89.7 | 147 | 1.0 | 98.3 | 87.7 | 153 | 1.0 |
Test item | 80.0 (p) | - | 53.1 | 17.6 | 160 | 1.1 | 70.2 | 38.0 | 156 | 1.0 |
Test item | 160.0 (p) | - | 39.1 | 20.6 | 347 | 2.4 | 96.7 | 33.2 | 195 | 1.3 |
* culture was not continued since a minimum of four concentrations is required by the guidelines
(p) precipitation visible to the naked eye
Table 3. HISTORICAL DATA
Number of mutant colonies per 106 cells | |||||||
4 h treatment | |||||||
Negative control | Positive control | Solvent control | |||||
without S9 mix | with S9 mix | without S9 mix | with S9 mix | without S9 mix | with S9 mix | ||
MMS | DMNA | CPA | |||||
range: | 41 - 208 | 41 -197 | 212 – 3321 | 203 - 847 | 209 – 1269 | 41 - 204 | 40 - 205 |
Mean value: | 107 | 110 | 479 | 389 | 390 | 106 | 110 |
Standard deviation | 37 | 38 | 281 | 203 | 170 | 39 | 35 |
Table 3. HISTORICAL DATA (cont.)
Number of mutant colonies per 106 cells | |||
24 h treatment | |||
Negative control | Positive control | Solvent control | |
without S9 mix | without S9 mix (MMS) | without S9 mix | |
range: | 40-212 | 243 - 2431 | 40 - 202 |
Mean value: | 109 | 863 | 107 |
Standard deviation | 40 | 461 | 39 |
Table1. Toxicity test on strain TA 100 without microsomal activation. Colonies per plate and arithmetic mean (m).
Concentration μg/plate | Experiment | ||
1 | 2 | mean | |
Control | 113 | 113 | 113 |
0.08 | 104 | 109 | 107 |
0.31 | 115 | 138 | 127 |
1.2 | 114 | 120 | 117 |
4.9 | 108 | 121 | 115 |
19.5 | 111 | 124 | 118 |
78.1 | 104 | 115 | 110 |
312.5 | 114 | 124 | 125 |
1250.0 | 123 | 127 | 125 |
5000.0 | 113 | 116 | 115 |
Positive controls (4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide) (μg/mL) | |||
Control | 105 | 111 | 108 |
0.125 | 883 | 930 | 907 |
0.250 | 1387 | 1483 | 1435 |
Table 2. Mutagenicity test* without microsomal activation: number of back mutant colonies per plate, arithmentic mean (m) and standard deviation (SD)
Concentration μg/plate | STRAIN | |||||||||||||||
TA 98 |
TA 100 | TA 1535 |
TA 1537 | |||||||||||||
Experiment |
1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) |
Control | 19 | 8 | 18 | 15 (6) | 125 | 138 | 161 | 141 (18) | 13 | 12 | 14 | 13 (1) | 5 | 13 | 6 | 8 (4) |
20 | 26 | 18 | 17 | 20 (5) | 140 | 164 | 165 | 156 (14) | 20 | 14 | 19 | 18 (3) | 4 | 2 | 5 | 4 (2) |
78 | 19 | 19 | 16 | 18 (2) | 139 | 173 | 170 | 161 (19) | 7 | 18 | 16 | 14 (6) | 12 | 8 | 5 | 8 (4) |
313 | 21 | 17 | 13 | 17 (4) | 132 | 149 | 132 | 138 (10) | 9 | 18 | 13 | 13 (5) | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 (1) |
1250 | 11 | 15 | 14 | 13 (2) | 152 | 124 | 153 | 143 (16) | 14 | 9 | 15 | 13 (3) | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 (1) |
5000 | 12 | 16 | 13 | 14 (2) | 149 | 140 | 132 | 140 (9) | 8 | 11 | 13 | 11 (3) | 6 | 4 | 5 | 5 (1) |
Positive controls (μg/plate) | ||||||||||||||||
daunorubicin-HCl | ||||||||||||||||
Control | 15 | 18 | 12 | 15 (3) | ||||||||||||
5 | 914 | 794 | 788 | 832 (71) | ||||||||||||
10 | 481 | 530 | 400 | 470 (66) | ||||||||||||
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide | ||||||||||||||||
Control | 151 | 153 | 134 | 146 (10) | ||||||||||||
0.125 | 560 | 567 | 606 | 578 (25) | ||||||||||||
0.25 | 1144 | 892 | 1065 | 1034 (129) | ||||||||||||
sodium azide | ||||||||||||||||
Control | 15 | 14 | 5 | 11 (6) | ||||||||||||
2.5 | 484 | 448 | 524 | 485 (38) | ||||||||||||
5 | 836 | 776 | 750 | 787 (44) | ||||||||||||
9 aminoacridine | ||||||||||||||||
Control | 12 | 5 | 9 | 9 (4) | ||||||||||||
50 | 14 | 17 | 26 | 19 (6) | ||||||||||||
100 | 206 | 194 | 261 | 220 (36) |
* representative study
Table 3. Mutagenicity test* with microsomal activation: number of back mutant colonies per plate, arithmentic mean (m) and standard deviation (SD)
Concentration μg/plate | STRAIN | |||||||||||||||
TA 98 | TA 100 | TA 1535 | TA 1537 | |||||||||||||
Experiment | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) | 1 | 2 | 3 | mean (SD) |
Control | 30 | 37 | 38 | 35 (4) | 180 | 157 | 164 | 167 (12) | 14 | 21 | 14 | 16 (4) | 8 | 6 | 13 | 9 (4) |
20 | 26 | 26 | 20 | 24 (3) | 185 | 172 | 148 | 168 (19) | 17 | 19 | 17 | 18 (1) | 9 | 8 | 14 | 10 (3) |
78 | 30 | 29 | 20 | 26 (6) | 177 | 187 | 165 | 176 (11) | 13 | 18 | 19 | 17 (3) | 14 | 3 | 13 | 10 (6) |
313 | 24 | 41 | 29 | 31 (9) | 172 | 164 | 173 | 170 (5) | 16 | 14 | 13 | 14 (2) | 16 | 12 | 12 | 13 (2) |
1250 | 28 | 24 | 25 | 26 (2) | 197 | 192 | 171 | 187 (14) | 9 | 11 | 12 | 11 (2) | 6 | 9 | 8 | 8 (2) |
5000 | 13 | 20 | 22 | 18 (5) | 157 | 158 | 146 | 151 (7) | 7 | 8 | 17 | 11 (6) | 6 | 11 | 7 | 8 (3) |
Positive controls (μg/plate) | ||||||||||||||||
2-aminoanthracene | 2-aminoanthracene | 2-aminoanthracene | ||||||||||||||
Control | 36 | 17 | 25 | 26 (10) | 161 | 163 | 148 | 157 (8) | 8 | 12 | 8 | 9 (2) | ||||
5 | 1409 | 1287 | 762 | 1153 (344) | 1779 | 1514 | 1416 | 1570 (188) | 240 | 224 | 177 | 214 (33) | ||||
cyclophosphamide | ||||||||||||||||
Control | 6 | 17 | 12 | 12 (6) | ||||||||||||
250 | 409 | 325 | 414 | 383 (50) |
* representative study
Table 2. Mitotic Index values (MI) Original study
Experiment 1. 3 hours with metabolic activation (recovery 14 h) | |||||
Cells scored | Mitosis | Frequency % of control | MI (%) | ||
Solvent control | 2000 | 155 | 100 | 7.75 | |
Test compound (μg/mL) | 220.0 | 2000 | 54 | 34.8 | 2.7 |
110.0 | 2000 | 65 | 41.9 | 3.25 | |
55.0 | 2000 | 78 | 50.3 | 3.9 | |
27.5 | 2000 | 117 | 75.5 | 5.85 | |
13.8 | 2000 | 145 | 93.5 | 7.25 | |
6.9 | 2000 | 150 | 96.8 | 7.5 | |
3.4 | * | ||||
1.7 | * | ||||
Experiment 2. 3 hours with metabolic activation (recovery 21 h) | |||||
Cells scored | Mitosis | Frequency % of control | M.I. (%) | ||
Solvent control | 2000 | 174 | 100 | 8.7 | |
Test compound (μg/mL) | 220.0 | 2000 | 71 | 40.8 | 3.55 |
110.0 | 2000 | 99 | 56.9 | 4.95 | |
55.0 | 2000 | 116 | 66.7 | 5.8 | |
27.5 | 2000 | 145 | 83.3 | 7.25 | |
13.8 | 2000 | 135 | 77.6 | 6.75 | |
6.9 | 2000 | 152 | 87.4 | 7.6 | |
3.4 | * | ||||
1.7 | * | ||||
Experiment 3. 14 hours without metabolic activation | |||||
Cells scored | Mitosis | Frequency % of control | M.I. (%) | ||
Solvent control | 2000 | 135 | 100 | 6.75 | |
Test compound (μg/mL) | 220.0 | 2000 | 20 | 14.8 | 1.0 |
110.0 | 2000 | 35 | 25.9 | 1.75 | |
55.0 | 2000 | 35 | 25.9 | 1.75 | |
27.5 | 2000 | 42 | 31.1 | 2.1 | |
13.8 | 2000 | 58 | 43 | 2.9 | |
6.9 | 2000 | 87 | 64.4 | 4.35 | |
3.4 | 2000 | 120 | 88.9 | 6.0 | |
1.7 | 2000 | 136 | 100.7 | 6.8 | |
Experiment 4. 24 hours without metabolic activation | |||||
Cells scored | Mitosis | Frequency % of control | M.I. (%) | ||
Solvent control | 2000 | 91 | 100 | 4.55 | |
Test compound (μg/mL) | 220.0 | 2000 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.05 |
110.0 | 2000 | 18 | 19.8 | 0.9 | |
55.0 | 2000 | 18 | 19.8 | 0.9 | |
27.5 | 2000 | 16 | 17.6 | 0.8 | |
13.8 | 2000 | 66 | 72.5 | 3.3 | |
6.9 | 2000 | 73 | 80.2 | 3.65 | |
3.4 | 2000 | 75 | 82.4 | 3.75 | |
1.7 | * | ||||
Experiment 5. 48 hours without metabolic activation | |||||
Cells scored | Mitosis | Frequency % of control | M.I. (%) | ||
Solvent control | 2000 | 79 | 100 | 3.95 | |
Test compound (μg/mL) | 220.0 | 2000 | 4 | 5.1 | 0.2 |
110.0 | 2000 | 10 | 12.7 | 0.5 | |
55.0 | 2000 | 7 | 8.9 | 0.35 | |
27.5 | 2000 | 10 | 12.7 | 0.5 | |
13.8 | 2000 | 19 | 24.1 | 0.95 | |
6.9 | 2000 | 64 | 81 | 3.2 | |
3.4 | 2000 | 82 | 103.8 | 4.1 | |
1.7 | 2000 | 93 | 117.7 | 4.65 |
* When 3 subsequent concentrations with a frequency of 70 % mitosis or more in relation to the negative control are found, the evaluation of the lower concentrations is omitted.
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Study conducted to recognised training guidelines with GLP
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987-04-06, 1987-09-03
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- hamster, Chinese
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CIBA-GEIGY Tierfarm, Sisseln, Switzerland
- Age at study initiation: Females 6 - 10 weeks; males 4 - 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Females 23-32 g; males 26-35 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Diet: Ad libitum, standard diet: NAFAG No.924
- Water: Ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 4 - 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21
- Humidity (%): 51 - 74
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle used: Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) 0.5 % in water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: TK 11319 is insoluble in water
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 5000 mg/kg bw in 20 mL/kg bw - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single dose exposure
- Frequency of treatment:
- Single dose
- Post exposure period:
- 16, 24, and 48 hours
- Dose / conc.:
- 5 000 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- In a preliminary toxicity test the dose of 5000 mg/kg was determined as the highest applicable in the mutagenicity assay.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 8 per sex per group
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Positive control(s):
- A dose of 64 mg/kg bw of cyclophosphamide was used as positive control. The route of administration was oral per gavage.
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow was harvested from the shafts of both femurs with fetal calf serum. After centrifugation small drops of the sediment mixture were transferred on the end of a slide, spread out with the aid of a polished cover glass. The preparations were air-dried. Within 24 hours, the slides were stained in undiluted May-Grünwald solution for 3 min then in May-Grünwald solution/water (1/1) for 2 min. After being rinsed in distilled water, the slides were left immersed in diluted Giemsa solution (16.6 %) for 10 min. After rinsing with distilled water and air-drying, the slides were cleared in xylene and mounted. 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) per animal were used to determine the incidence of micronucleated PCE. A total of 1000 erythrocytes were counted for determination of the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes (PCE/NCE -ratio).
- Statistics:
- The significance of difference is assessed by χ2-test.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Remarks:
- No significant differences in the PCE/NCE-ratio between treated groups and controls.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The substance tested in the in vivo Micronucleus Test with Chinese Hamster (method similar to OECD 474) up to 5000 mg/kg bw was not genotoxic.
- Executive summary:
In this guideline (OECD 474) study conducted to GLP standards, the test material (EC 404-360-3) was tested in vivo on chinese hamsters (male and female) aged 4 -10 weeks. The test substance was administered via oral gavage in a vehicle of 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (concentration of test material in vehicle was 5000 mg/kg bw in 20 ml/kg bw). 8 animals of each sex per dose were tested, with various sacrifice times (16, 24 and 48 hours). After sacrifice, bone marrow was harvested from the shafts of both femurs with fetal calf serum for analysis. As well as a control, there was a positive control using 64 mg/kg bw of cyclophosphamide (also administered via oral gavage). The bone marrow tissue was then examined for incidence of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) - an increase in frequency being an indicator of induced chromosome damage. No PCE was observed for the test material, therefore EC 404 -360 -3 is not genotoxic.
Reference
Table 1. Effect of test article on bone marrow cells of chinese hamster: arithmetic mean per sex and group.
Sacrifice (h) | ||||||||||||
16 | 24 | 48 | ||||||||||
Control | TK 11319 | Control | TK 11319 | Control | TK 11319 | |||||||
sex of the animals | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ |
polychromatic erythrocytes (P) | 626 | 520 | 550 | 551 | 489 | 471 | 482 | 486 | 555 | 539 | 459 | 485 |
normochromatic erythrocytes (N) | 374 | 480 | 450 | 449 | 511 | 529 | 518 | 514 | 445 | 461 | 541 | 515 |
ratio P/N | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.9 |
P with micronuclei | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
percent of P with micronuclei | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.06 |
Table 1 (cont.). Effect of test article on bone marrow cells of chinese hamster: arithmetic mean per sex and group (positive control).
Sacrifice (h) | ||||
24 | ||||
Control | Cyclophosphamide (64 mg/kg) | |||
sex of the animals | ♀ | ♂ | ♀ | ♂ |
polychromatic erythrocytes (P) | 489 | 471 | 452 | 450 |
normochromatic erythrocytes (N) | 511 | 529 | 548 | 550 |
ratio P/N | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
P with micronuclei | 0.6 | 1.0 | 27.0 | 32.2 |
percent of P with micronuclei | 0.06 | 0.10 | 2.70 | 3.22 |
Additional information
Two Ames tests are available. Concentrations of 20, 78, 313, 1250, and 5000 µg/plate were tested in S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100, with and without metabolic activation (Ciba-Geigy 1987) according to OECD 471 (1981). The same concentrations were tested in a previous screening study in Salmonella strains TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1537, with and without metabolic activation (Ciba-Geigy 1986); the test conduct was similar to OECD 471.
In the first study no increased mutation frequency was observed both in the absence and presence of S9-mix. Up to the highest concentration no cytotoxicity was seen. In the second study also no increased mutation frequency was observed in the absence of S9-mix. In the presence of S9-mix, a slight (not doubled) and not significant increase of mutant colonies was observed at concentrations of 313 µg/plate and above for strain TA 100 only. Since the mutation frequency was not doubled in comparison to control and no dose-relationship was seen the effect is considered of no biological relevance. Up to the highest concentration no cytotoxicity was seen.
Thus, the test article was not genotoxic when tested in the Ames test under the chosen conditions.
In a guideline study conducted according to OECD 473 (1983) doses of 1.72, 3.44, 6.88, 13.75, 27.5, 55.0, 110.0, 220.0 µg/ml were tested for the induction of chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro with and without S9-mix (Ciba-Geigy 1990). The number of cells with chromosomal aberrations in the treatment groups showed no marked increase in comparison with the negative control. Thus, under the given experimental conditions, no evidence of mutagenic effects was obtained in Chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro after treatment with the test article.
Mouse lymphoma cells L5178Y were treated with test article according to OECD 476 (RCC 2006). The test design consisted of two main experiments using two parallel cultures. The cells were treated with the test item for 4 h with and without metabolic activation in the first experiment. In the second experiment the duration of treatment was 4 h with and 24 h without metabolic activation. A confirmatory experiment was added to verify mutagenicity data generated in the first experiment without metabolic activation. The cultures were evaluated at concentrations ranging from 10 to 160 µg/ml with and without S9-mix in the first experiment. In the second experiment the concentrations were 5 to 40 µg/ml without and 10 to 160 µg/ml with S9-mix. The confirmatory experiment without S9-mix was conducted with 10 to 160 µg/ml.
Precipitation of the test item and decrease in cloning efficiency was observed at doses of 80 and 160 µg/ml in all experiments. A biologically irrelevant increase in mutation frequency was observed in some dishes of the first experiment with S9-mix, which could not be reproduced; the effect was therefore considered as artifact. An increase in mutation frequency was also observed in the second experiment (without S9-mix). Since absolute values of the mutation frequency remained within the historical range of negative and solvent controls, this effect was also considered to be biologically irrelevant. Therefore, the test article was not mutagenic in the mouse lymphoma test.
An in vivo micronucleus test with Chinese Hamster was conducted similar to OECD 474, at a dose of 5000 mg/kg bw (Ciba-Geigy 1987).The number of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei in the treatment group showed no increase in comparison to the negative control. Thus, under the given experimental conditions, no evidence of mutagenic effects was obtained in Chinese hamster in vivo.
Under in vitro and in vivo conditions, the substance is not mutagenic to bacteria and to mammalian cells in culture with and without metabolic activation and is not clastogenic in mammalian cells. Under in vivo conditions the substance is not clastogenic in Chinese hamster.
Short description of key
information:
Valid studies on the in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicity are
available. Two Ames tests were performed, the more recent according to
OECD 471 (Ciba-Geigy 1987) and the older as a screening study with three
strains (Ciba-Geigy 1986). A chromosome aberration assay with Chinese
Hamster Ovary Cells was conducted according to OECD 473 (Ciba-Geigy
1990) and a forward mutation assay in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
according to OECD 476 (RCC, 2006) is also available. For in vivo
mutagenicity testing, a micronucleus test with Chinese Hamster similar
to OECD 474 was done (Ciba-Geigy1987). None of the assays revealed
positive results.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Dangerous Substance Directive (67/548/EEC)
The available studies are considered reliable and suitable for classification purposes under 67/548/EEC. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for mutagenicity under Directive 67/548/EEC, as amended for the 31st time in Directive 2009/2/EG.
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result the substance is not considered to be classified for mutagenicity under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008, as amended for the fifth time in Directive (EC 944/2013).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.