Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

The substance 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol was found to be non mutagenic.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: estimated data
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Prediction is done using QSAR Toolbox version 2.3.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
without
Metabolic activation system:
S9
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
not specified
Vehicle controls validity:
not specified
Untreated negative controls validity:
not specified
Positive controls validity:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.





The prediction was based on dataset comprised from the following descriptors: "Gene mutation"
Estimation method: Taking highest mode value from the 5 nearest neighbours
Domain logical expression:Result: In Domain

((("a" and "b" ) and ("c" and ( not "d") ) ) and ("e" and "f" and "g" and "h" ) )

Domain logical expression index: "a"

Similarity boundary:Target: C(Cl)COCCO
Threshold=50%,
Dice(Atom pairs)

Domain logical expression index: "b"

Similarity boundary:Target: C(Cl)COCCO
Threshold=60%,
Dice(Atom pairs)

Domain logical expression index: "c"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as No alert found by Protein binding by OASIS

Domain logical expression index: "d"

Referential boundary: The target chemical should be classified as Acid anhydride OR Active cyclic agents OR Aldehydes OR alpha,beta-carbonyl compounds with polarized double bonds OR alpha-activated haloalkanes OR alpha-haloalkanes OR alpha-ketoesters OR Diketones OR Epoxides, Aziridines and Sulfuranes OR Ketones OR MA: Addition to Carbon-hetero double/triple bond OR MA: Direct acylation involving a leaving group OR MA: Michael addition on conjugated systems with electron withdrawing group OR MA: Nucleophilic cycloaddition to diketones OR MA: Nucleophilic substitution at sp3 Carbon atom OR MA: Ring opening acylation OR MA: Ring opening SN2 reaction OR MA: Schiff base formation with carbonyl compounds OR Mechanistic Domain: Acylation OR Mechanistic Domain: Michael addition OR Mechanistic domain: Nucleophilic addition OR Mechanistic Domain: Schiff base formation OR Mechanistic Domain: SN2 by Protein binding by OASIS

Domain logical expression index: "e"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is >= -0.386

Domain logical expression index: "f"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of log Kow which is <= 0.00239

Domain logical expression index: "g"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of Water Solubility which is >= 2.74E005 mg/L

Domain logical expression index: "h"

Parametric boundary:The target chemical should have a value of Water Solubility which is <= 4.64E005 mg/L

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative without metabolic activation

Based on the prediction for in-vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay (e.g. Ames test) on S. typhimurium TA 100 without S9 metabolic activation it was estimated that 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol was non mutagenic.
Executive summary:

Based on the prediction for in-vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay (e.g. Ames test) on S. typhimurium TA 100 without S9 metabolic activation it was estimated that 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol was non mutagenic.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:

Ames Test :

Based on the prediction for in-vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay (e.g. Ames test) on S. typhimurium TA 100 without S9 metabolic activation it was estimated that 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol was non mutagenic.

Chromosome aberration :

Based on the prediction for in-vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test on Chinese hamster Lung (CHL) without S9 metabolic activation it was estimated that 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol does not exhibit positive chromosomal effect.

Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint

Based on the prediction for in-vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay (e.g. Ames test) on S. typhimurium TA 100 without S9 metabolic activation it was estimated that 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol was non mutagenic. Also Based on the prediction for in-vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test on Chinese hamster Lung (CHL) without S9 metabolic activation it was estimated that 2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol does not exhibit positive chromosomal effect.

Justification for classification or non-classification

2-(2-chloroethoxy)ethanol shows negative activity as is the case for chromosome abberation for the same substance.