Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
December 20th, 1988 - February 9th, 1989
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
GLP guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1989
Report date:
1989

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
: no historical data reported
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
4-isopropylaniline
EC Number:
202-797-2
EC Name:
4-isopropylaniline
Cas Number:
99-88-7
Molecular formula:
C9H13N
IUPAC Name:
4-(propan-2-yl)aniline
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Cumidin
- Chemical name: 1-Amino-4-isopropylbenzol
- Physical state: darkbrown liquid
- Analytical purity: > 98 %
- Code: GKGB 155
- Charge No.: 55. Kamp.
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: not specified by the sponsor
- Storage condition of test material: darkness at 20 degree C

Method

Target gene:
HGPRT (hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl transferase)
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM with Hanks-salts and 25 mM Hepes-buffer
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: no data
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: no data
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: no data
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0, 50, 200, 350 and 500 µg/mL
(at 600 and 700 µg /mL because of high cytotoxicity no mutant selection was performed)
Vehicle / solvent:
At the day of the experiment the test substance was dissolved in ethanol (final concentration max 1 %).
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
the final ethanol concentration did not exceed 1 %
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: without metabolic activation: ethylmethanesulphonate; with metabolic activation: 9,10-dimethylbenzanthracene in DMSO
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours of treatment with test substance with and without S9-mix
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 7 days (2 subcultures were made)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 7 days in medium containing 6-thioguanine
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 14 days after the 4h-exposure the cells were fixed and stained with 10% methylene blue in 0.01 n KOH solution

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): Thioguanine (0.11 % in the medium)

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Two independent experiments with and without S9 -mix were performed.

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth;

OTHER: RATIONALE FOR DOSE SELECTION
The dose level which resulted in a 30 % survival in the preliminary cytotoxicity experiment was chosen as the highest dose level.
The lowest doses were chosen based on the level from the negative controls.
Evaluation criteria:
Mutagenic,
- if the mutation frequency was 3 times higher than the spontaneous frequency in this experimental setting and
- if the mutation frequency was increased in a concentration - related manner.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 750 µg/mL and above. No precipitation was visible at the highest soluble concentration of 1352 µg/mL.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: up to highest soluble concentrations no precipitation observed.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
500 µg/mL was determined in the absence and presence of metabolic activation as the maximal dose level for mutagenicity testing. Higher doses showed toxic effects on the cells.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
no historical data shown

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Mutagenicity Data - Experiment I

 

 

Dose per mL

S9-mix

Number of mutant colonies

 

 

mean

Standard deviation

Mutation frequency*

I

II

III

IV

V

Negative control

0

-

19

20

15

15

14

16.6

2.70

63.4

Solvent control

0

-

10

15

11

14

6

11.2

3.56

52.3

Positive control: EMS

1.0 mg

-

108

120

118

105

108

111.8

6.72

463.8

Cumidin

50 µg

-

12

10

18

15

24

15.8

5.50

61.1

 

200 µg

-

13

26

22

18

16

19.0

5.10

81.0

 

350 µg

-

8

6

6

16

16

10.4

5.18

44.9

 

500 µg

-

12

12

10

11

9

10.8

1.30

58.7

Negative control

0

+

18

17

22

11

13

16.2

4.32

56.9

Solvent control

0

+

17

15

10

16

18

15.2

3.11

46.9

Positive control: DMBA

7.7 µg

+

156

187

164

194

150

170.2

19.34

890.7

Cumidin

50 µg

+

20

17

20

12

12

16.2

4.01

76.0

 

200 µg

+

10

11

14

15

16

13.2

2.59

53.0

 

350 µg

+

9

8

8

9

12

9.2

1.64

50.1

 

500 µg

+

13

6

3

6

5

6.6

3.78

26.9

*Mutation frequency (mutanta colonies per 106cells): mean value x 106/ cells survived (data given in original report)

 

Table 2: Mutagenicity Data - Experiment II

 

 

Dose per mL

S9-mix

Number of mutant colonies

 

 

mean

Standard deviation

Mutation frequency*

I

II

III

IV

V

Negative control

0

-

15

9

15

5

11

11.0

4.24

59.2

Solvent control

0

-

16

16

15

16

29

18.4

5.94

94.8

Positive control: EMS

1.0 mg

-

89

110

85

116

125

105.0

17.33

477.4

Cumidin

50 µg

-

12

12

15

18

12

13.8

2.68

63.7

 

200 µg

-

9

15

14

17

15

14.0

3.00

79.0

 

350 µg

-

10

6

6

14

16

10.4

4.56

77.1

 

500 µg

-

7

6

7

11

7

7.6

1.95

40.8

Negative control

0

+

5

10

14

13

14

11.2

3.83

39.8

Solvent control

0

+

14

15

15

15

10

13.8

2.17

52.9

Positive control: DMBA

7.7 µg

+

112

99

109

132

126

115.4

13.63

671.3

Cumidin

50 µg

+

22

13

22

16

17

18.0

3.94

121.7

 

200 µg

+

9

18

15

7

11

12.0

4.47

78.1

 

350 µg

+

11

10

11

13

11

11.2

1.10

58.3

 

500 µg

+

25

14

10

24

19

18.4

6.43

98.2

*Mutation frequency (mutanta colonies per 106cells): mean value x 106/ cells survived (data given in original report)

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results:
negative in HGPRT-test with cells of the V79 Chinese hamster cell line.
Executive summary:

An in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation assay was performed according to OECD guideline 476. The mutagenic potential of Cumidin was tested using the method for induction of the HPRT gene in V79 Chinese hamster cells at dose levels of 0, 50, 200, 350 and 500 µg /mL in two independent experiments with and without metabolic activation (S9 -mix). In a preliminary cytotoxicity experiment significant cytotoxic effects were observed at concentrations ranging from 750 - 1352 µg /mL.

The test compound did not induce a significant increase in the number of mutant colonies in comparison to negative and positive controls. In conclusion, the test substance Cumidin did not induce gene mutations in the HPRT-test with V79 Chinese hamster cells, either with or without metabolic activation under the described experimental conditions.