Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

A valid Ames test, an in-vitro Chromosome Aberration test and a HPRT test, in chinese hamster V79 cells with 1,1 '-(1 ,6-Hexanediyldiimino)- bis[1 -oxo-methanesulfonic acid], sodium salt (1 :2), was negative.

A micronucleus assay in bone marrow cells of the mouse with 1,1’-(1,6-Hexanediyldiimino)bis[1-oxomethanesulfonic acid], sodium salt (1:2) according to OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test) was also negative


Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
In vivo MNT test has been conducted in addition to Ames test, in-vitro chromosome abberation test and HPRT test, since it's required for the registration in China.

Short description of key information:
in vitro:
Ames test: negative
Cytogenetic assay: negative
mammalian cell gene mutation test: negative
in vivo:
MNT: negative

Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)

Justification for classification or non-classification

All available genetic toxicity assays showed a negative result. Therefore a classification is not justified.