Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Test was carried out according to OECD test guideline 406 in compliance with GLP. Data entered as supplied by ECHA following an inquiry for the same substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: study summary provided by ECHA
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Report date:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU B6 - OECD 406
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Chloro-1-ethyl isopropyl carbonate
EC Number:
424-590-8
EC Name:
Chloro-1-ethyl isopropyl carbonate
Cas Number:
98298-66-9
Molecular formula:
C6H11ClO3
IUPAC Name:
1-chloroethyl propan-2-yl carbonate

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
Induction:
Day 1: Intradermal injection of 5% test substance in paraffin
Day 8: Epicutaneous application of pure substance (100%)

Challenge:
Day 22: Epicutaneous application of 75% test substance in paraffin

Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
other: epicutaneous
Vehicle:
paraffin oil
Concentration / amount:
Induction:
Day 1: Intradermal injection of 5% test substance in paraffin
Day 8: Epicutaneous application of pure substance (100%)

Challenge:
Day 22: Epicutaneous application of 75% test substance in paraffin

No. of animals per dose:
Number of animals in test group: 20
Number of animals in negative control group: 10
Positive control substance(s):
no

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
20
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 20.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
75%
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 75%. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Maximum concentration not causing irritating effects in preliminary test: 75%

Signs of irritation during induction: Skin reactions in 100% of the animals tested.

Skin reactions that were more intense than the maximum reaction observed in control animals at 48 hours were considered as sensitising reactions (19/20 animals).

The score was 1 in the control animals.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The results of this study demonstrate that the substance is classified as a skin sensitiser (Skin Sensitiser, Category 1B) according to EU classification requirements (CLP).
Executive summary:

All animals experienced skin effects at a concentration level of 75% of the test substance, therefore the substance is classified as a skin sensitiser (Skin Sensitiser, Category 1B) according to EU classification requirements (CLP). The results indicate that the