Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Test was carried out according to OECD test guideline 405 in compliance with GLP. Data entered as supplied by ECHA following an inquiry for the same substance.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: study summary provided by ECHA
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Report date:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: EU B5 - OECD 405
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Chloro-1-ethyl isopropyl carbonate
EC Number:
424-590-8
EC Name:
Chloro-1-ethyl isopropyl carbonate
Cas Number:
98298-66-9
Molecular formula:
C6H11ClO3
IUPAC Name:
1-chloroethyl propan-2-yl carbonate
Details on test material:
Nature of substance: Liquid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White

Test system

Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
1 ml
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean score 1
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean score 2
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
1
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean score 3
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0.3
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Max. score:
2
Remarks on result:
other: Max. duration: 2 h; Max. value at end of observation period: 0 (related to all animals)
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean score 1
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean score 2
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0.3
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean score 3
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Max. score:
1
Remarks on result:
other: Max. duration: 1 h; Max. value at end of observation period: 0 (related to all animals)
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean score 1
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean score 2
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0.7
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean score 3
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Max. score:
1
Remarks on result:
other: Max. duration: 1 h; Max. value at end of observation period: 0 (related to all animals)
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Remarks:
mean score 1
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Remarks:
mean score 2
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0.3
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Remarks:
mean score 3
Time point:
other: overall at 24, 48 and 72 hour
Score:
0
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Max. score:
1
Remarks on result:
other: Max. duration: 1 h; Max. value at end of observation period: 0 (related to all animals)
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Reversibility of any observed effect: Changes fully reversible within 3 days

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not classified
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The results of this study demonstrate that the substance is not classified as an eye irritant according to EU classification requirements (CLP).
Executive summary:

The mean corneal opacity and iritisis scores for each animal were below 3 and 1.5, respectively. The effects seen were also fully reversible within 3 days therefore, the substance is not classified as an eye irritant according to EU classification requirements (CLP).