Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-292-9 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
- Remarks:
- GLP conform study following US regulation for the enforcement of the "Federal Hazardous Substances Act 16 CFR 1500". Reports are not as detailed as modern protocols but include all required information. The principles and methodology used for testing is comparable to modern OECD 404 guideline besides longer exposure time compared to OECD 404 which is no considered critical regarding reliability of the study. Interpretation of the results is different to OECD 404 protocols and frequency of observation is lower. This is not considered critical regarding reliability of the study as results are reported in a way that interpretation according to the OECD 406 guideline was possible and 3 of four animals did not show any response after 72h. Therefore, the study is considered to be reliable.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US regulation for the Enforcement of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (16 CFR 1500)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- longer exposure time, less frequent observations
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Clerco Research Farm
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Housing: single, suspension cages with wire mesh floors
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): purina laboratory rabbit chow
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: min 1 day
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs. light/12 hrs. dark - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: shaved and intact
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): Test material moistened with 0.5 ml physiol. saline - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 h
- Observation period:
- 72 h
- Number of animals:
- 6 (3 male and 3 female)
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 1" x 1" gauze square
SCORING SYSTEM:
Application sites are scored for each rabbit immediately after removal of test material (24 h) and after 72 hours. The scoring system used is the following:
Erythema and Eschar Formation (mostseverely affected area graded):
No erythema: 0
Very slight erythema (barely perceptible): 1
Well defined erythema: 2
Moderate to severe erythema: 3
Severe erythema (beet redness) to slight eschar formation (injuries in depth): 4
Edema Formation (most severely affected area graded):
No edema: 0
Very slight edema (barely perceptible): 1
Slight edema (edges of area well-defined by defnite raising): 2
Moderate (raised approximately 1mm): 3
Severe edema (raised more than 1 mm and extending beyond area of exposure): 4
The values for each rabbit were totaled and averaged for each of the categories:
1 Erythema and eschar formation, intact skin, 24h
2 Erythema and eschar formation, abraded skin, 24h
3 Erythema and eschar formation, intact skin, 72h
4 Erythema and eschar formation, abraded skin, 72h
5 Edema, abraded skin 24 h
6 Edema, intact skin 24 h
7 Edema, abraded skin 72 h
8 Edema, intact skin 72 h
The eight average scores are added and the results divided by four to obtain the Primary Irritation Index. A corrosive material is a material which causes destructive or irreversible damage to tissue. A primary irritant is one which gives a PII of five or more. - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Basis:
- mean
- Score:
- 1.9
- Max. score:
- 8
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: No changes in coloration or texture of the skin were noted. No evidence of corrosion was found.
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24 h
- Score:
- 1.5
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Application of hexagonal boron nitride for 24 h to intact and abraded skin did not result in damage to the skin. Slight edema observed directly after 24 h exposure was not existent 48 h after end of exposure (72 h). Hexagonal boron nitride does neither have to be classified as irritant nor as corrosive.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1990
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- GLP conform study which was performed following US regulation for the enforcement of the "Federal Hazardous Substances Act 16 CFR 1500". Study protocol is slightly different to actual OECD guideline 403. Reports are not as detailed as modern protocols but includes all necessary information. The principles and methodology used for testing is comparable to modern guidelines. Observation period was shorter than according to OECD 403 guideline and the dose was smaller. Evaluation of results (scoring system) identical to OECD 403 guideline. The shorter observation period is not considered critical regarding reliability of the study as 5 of six animals did not show any symptoms 48 h after application. Therefore, the study is considered to be reliable.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- shorter observation period, dose smaller than recommended in OECD guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: US regulation for the Enforcement of the Federal Hazardous Substances Act (16 CFR 1500)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Clerko Research Farm
- Age at study initiation: young adult
- Housing: housed singly in suspension cages with wire mesh floors
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): purina laboratory rabbit chow
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: min 1 day
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs light/12 hrs dark - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.048 g to one eye of each animal
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 48 h (eyes were not rinsed)
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 48 h (observations 1h, 24h and 48h after start of exposure)
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- Test substance was applied to one eye, the other served as control.
SCORING SYSTEM: identical to OECD 403 guideline
Observation according to the method of Draize (1959) - Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Remarks on result:
- not measured/tested
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24 h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 4
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 2 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: 48h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 48h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 48h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: 48h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 48h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 24h
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #5
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24h
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- other: 1h
- Score:
- 2
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24h
- Remarks on result:
- other: Only conjunctival redness grade 1 was observed
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- animal #6
- Time point:
- other: 24h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 110
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 24h
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- When hexagonal boron nitride was applied to the eyes of New Zealand white rabbits, 1h after instillation, all animals showed conjunctivae redness grade 1 (5 of 6 animals) or grade 2 (one animal). 24 h after exposure, 3 of 6 animals still showed conjunctivae redness grade 1 and 48 h after exposure in only one animal conjunctivae redness grade 1 was observed. No other responses (of coroneal opacy or iris or conjunctival redness) have been observed during the observation period (48h after the test material has been applied to the eye) and no evidence of corrosion was noted. Against this background, the short observation period is not considered critical as 48 h after application 5 of six animals showed no symptoms. The reduced dose (0.048 g instead of 0.1 g) is also not considered critical regarding reliability of the study as all effects observed (conjunctival redness) most likely result from the physical properties of the substance and application of the twofold dose is assumed not to cause different or severe effects. Hexagonal boron nitride is therefore not classified as an irritant by occular application and does not have to be classified as corrosive to the eye.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.