Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-288-3 | CAS number: 137-30-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Phototoxicity in vitro
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- phototoxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23 Jul - 19 Sep 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Type of study:
- in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD TG 432 (In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2004
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD TG 432 (In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2019
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- cells not checked for mycoplasma,
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.41 ( In vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2008
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) Note for Guidance on Photosafety testing, EMEA, CPMP/SWP/398/01
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2002
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species / strain / cell type:
- BALB/c 3T3
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
-Type and source of cells: BALB/c 3T3 c31 cell line (ZEBET, Berlin, Germany) - Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Earle's Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS) containing 1% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) in the absence and presence of irradiation
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- chloropromazine HCL
- Remarks:
- Chlorpromazine dissolved in EBSS: 6.25, 12.5, 25, 37.5, 50, 75, 100 and 200 µg/mL in the absence of irradiation 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 4.0 µg/mL in the presence of irradiation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- IN VITRO 3T3 NRU PHOTOTOXICITY TEST
INCUBATION BEFORE AND AFTER TREATMENT
- type and composition of culture medium: Dulbecco's Minimal Essential Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% newborn calf serum (NCS)
- incubation conditions (CO2 concentration, temperature, humidity): The cell cultures were incubated at 37 ± 1.5 °C in a 7.5 ± 0.5% carbon dioxide atmosphere.
- duration of incubation (pre- and post-treatment): Approximately 24 - 26 h after seeding the cultures were treated with the test item. The plates with the test substance were pre-incubated in the dark for 1 h. Afterwards, one plate was irradiated for 50 ± 2 min, while the other plate was stored in the dark.
TREATMENT WITH THE CHEMICAL
- rationale for selection of concentrations of the test chemical used in the presence and in the absence of irradiation:
The highest applied concentrations of the test item was based on a range finding experiment with 31.25 µg/mL being the highest concentration used due to limited solubility of the test item.
- duration of the chemical treatment: for 50 ± 2 min and after removing of the test substance, cells were washed and further incubated overnight in fresh culture medium at 37 ± 1.5 °C and 7.5 ± 0.5% C02.
IRRADIATION
- manufacturer and type of light source and radiometer: Dr. Hönle Sol 500 solar simulator with a H1 filter used to keep the UVB irradiation as low as possible
- spectral irradiance characteristics of the light source: >320 nm
- characteristics of the radiometer and details on its calibration: Due to the inhomogeneous distribution of irradiation intensity the UVA intensity was measured at the complete area with a UV-meter. The homogeneous area was marked and the cultures were irradiated in this area. The solar simulator was switched on about 30 min prior to the start of experiment.
- UVA irradiance at this distance, expressed in mW/cm2: 2.55 - 2.7
- duration of the UV/vis light exposure: 50 ± 2 min
- UVA dose (irradiance x time), expressed in J/cm2: 7.65 - 8.1
- temperature of cell cultures during irradiation and cell cultures concurrently kept in the dark: with and without irradiation: 50 ± 2 min at 20 - 30 °C
NEUTRAL RED VIABILITY TEST
- composition of Neutral Red treatment medium: serum free medium containing 50 µg Neutral Red/mL
- duration of Neutral Red incubation: 3 h
- Neutral Red extraction conditions (extractant, duration):
0.15 mL of a solution of 49% (v/v) deionised water, 50% (v/v) ethanol and 1% (v/v) acetic acid were added to each well to extract the dye. After additional approximately 10 min at room temperature and a brief agitation, the plates were transferred to a microplate reader.
- wavelength used for spectrophotometric reading of Neutral Red optical density: 540 nm - Vehicle:
- yes
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: EBSS containing 1% DMSO
- Evaluation criteria:
- The effective dose where only 50% of the cells survived (ED50), the Photo-Irritancy-Factor (PIF), as well as the Mean Phototoxic Effect (MPE) were calculated.
Evaluation of Results
A Photo-irritation Factor (PIF) was calculated:
PIF = (ED50 in the absence of UV)/(ED50 in the presence of UV)
If a chemical was only cytotoxic after exposure to UV light, but was not cytotoxic when tested in its absence, the PIF could not be accurately calculated. In this situation, the phototoxic potential of the test article was demonstrated from determination of the Mean Photo Effect (MPE). The MPE is based on comparison of the complete concentration response curves. It is defined as the weighted average across a representative set of photo effect values.
Based on the results obtained, the test item is evaluated as follows:
- if PIF (Photo-Irritancy-Factor) < 2 or MPE (Mean Phototoxic Effect) < 0.1: no phototoxic potential predicted
- if PIF > 2 and < 5 or MPE >0.1 and <0.15 a probable phototoxic potential is predicted.
- if PIF > 5 or MPE > 0.15 a phototoxic potential predicted.
Acceptability of the Assay
The assay meets the acceptance criteria:
- if after irradiation with a UVA doseof 5 J/cm² the cell viability of the solvent control is > 80% of non irradiated cells.
- if for the positive control CPZ the factor (PIF) between the two ED50 valuesis > 6.
- if the mean OD540 of solvent controls is > 0.4. - Statistics:
- No statistics were performed.
- Results:
- OSMOLALITY AND PH
The osmolarity and the pH value of the highest concentrated test item solution of each experiment were measured prior to the experiments. An influence of the test item on pH or osmolarity was not observed in both experiments.
IN VITRO 3T3 NRU PHOTOTOXICITY TEST
Range finding experiment
A dose dependent cytotoxicity was observed after treatment of cells with the test substance in the presence and absence of irradiation with artificial sunlight. The ED50 value of the test item under irradiation was 0.7927 µg/mL and 0.9368 µg/mL in the absence of the artificial sunlight. The PIF of the test item was, 1.194 and the MPE values were calculated as -0.001. The PIF as well as the MPE value do not indicate any phototoxic potential.
Main experiment
The main experiment confirmed the cytotoxic effects observed in the range finding experiment. The ED50 value of the test item under irradiation was 0.9478 µg/mL and 1.068 µg/mL in the absence of artificial sunlight. The PIF of the test item was 1.127 and the MPE value were calculated as -0.004. Again, PIF as well as the MPE values do not indicate any phototoxic potential.
With regard to the acceptance criteria, the mean of solvent control values of the irradiated group versus the non irradiated group was 98.1 % (RFE) and 106.0 % (ME) for the test item and 91.3 % (RFE) and 84.6 % (ME) for the positive control plate.
The positive control chlorpromazine induced phototoxicity in the expected range after irradiation with artificial sunlight. The ED50 values were calculated in the absence (RFE: 15.02 µg/mL,
ME: 10.88 µg/mL) and the presence (RFE: 0.7592 µg/mL, ME: 0.4262 µg/mL) of irradiation. The resulting PIF was 19.790 (RFE) and 25.749 (ME). The resulting MPE was 0.583 (RFE) and 0.669 (ME).
For details on the results, please refer to attachment 2 and 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments"
Historical control data were provided an can be found in attachment 1 under "Overall remarks, attachments". - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- Relevant effect levels: cell viability was below 50% from 0.98 µg/mL on with and without irradiadiation. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The phototoxic potential of the present substance was assessed in the in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test according to OECD TG 432 and GLP. Under the conditions used, the test substance did not have any phototoxic effects on BALB/c 3T3cells.
Reference
Description of key information
Key, report number 1564000, BALB/c 3T3 NRU
no phototoxic effects observed
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Results:
- no phototoxicity
Additional information
The following study (Report number: 1564000) was performed similar to OECD 432 and GLP to assess the phototoxic potential of the test substance. The test was performed using BALB/c 3T3cells. The experiment was performed twice, the first experiment served as a range finding experiment and the second as the main experiment. 31.25 µg/mL of the test item, dissolved in DMSO with a final concentration of 1% in Earle's Balanced Salt Solution (EBSS), were applied as the highest concentration in the first experiment. In the main experiment, the highest tested concentration of the test item solved in DMSO was chosen as 3.0 µg/mL under and without irradiation. One test group of cells treated with the test item was irradiated with artificial sunlight for 50 minutes with 2.55 - 2.7 mW/cm² UVA, resulting in an irradiation dose of 7.65 - 8.1 J/cm² UVA. Another test group of test item treated cells were kept in the dark for 50 min. A dose-dependent cytotoxicity was observed after treatment of cells with the test substance in the presence and absence of irradiation with artificial sunlight in both experiments. The photo-irritation Factor (PIF) as well as the mean phototoxic effect (MPE) values do not indicate any phototoxic potential. The mean of solvent control values of the irradiated group versus the non-irradiated group met the acceptance criteria. The positive control chlorpromazine induced phototoxicity in the expected range.
In conclusion, the test substance is not considered to be phototoxic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.