Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-288-3 | CAS number: 137-30-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 Jun 1989 - 11 Jun 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 004
- Report date:
- 2004
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 990
- Report date:
- 1990
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2018
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- the treatment was restricted to the period of organogenesis and did not cover the complete gestation period, only 4 days of acclimation period, continued under "Principles of method if other than guideline"
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Further deviations to the current guideline (adopted in 2018): anogenital distance not measured, gravid uterus weights not shown, no historical control data provided and parameters related to the detection of endocrine disrupting potential (thyroid weights, thyroid histopathology and thyroid hormones) not examined as they were not required at the time the study was conducted, no special attention paid to reproductive tract of foetusses.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ziram
- EC Number:
- 205-288-3
- EC Name:
- Ziram
- Cas Number:
- 137-30-4
- Molecular formula:
- C6H12N2S4Zn
- IUPAC Name:
- ziram
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Portage, Michigan, USA
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 161 - 218 g
- Housing: 5 per cage in suspended galvanised metal cages
- Diet: Labsure Laboratory Animal Diet No. 1, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Pregnant females arrived at the laboratory 4 days before beginning of treatment.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 23
- Humidity (%): 52 - 60
- Air changes (per hr): not specified
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 19 Jun 1989 To: 04 Jul 1989
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: 1% Methylcellulose (MC)
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
Suspensions of the test article were prepared on a daily basis. The highest required concentration was prepared by suspending a weighed quantity of the test article in the vehicle. The low concentrations were prepared by serial dilution. The dose volume was 0.1 mL/100 g. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Samples were taken for analysis of achieved concentration on the second day of dosing. Results showed that achieved concentration was within 9% of nominal concentration.
At nominal concentrations of 1.0 and 80 mg/mL, the results indicate that the test substance produces a homogeneous suspension in 1% MC formulations. Analysis of formulation showed that homogeneity was maintained by magnetic stirring for 1 h and that the formulation could be successfully resupended 4 h after preparation during storage at ambient temperature and at 24 h after storage at 4 °C.
Further, chemical stability of the test substance in 1% MC formulations was confirmed during storage at ambient temperature in the dark for 4 h and at 4 °C for 24 h. - Details on mating procedure:
- No data.- Impregnation procedure: purchased timed pregnant
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as Day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Day 6 - 15 post mating
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily
- Duration of test:
- Day 20 of gestation
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 4 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 16 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 64 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 25 females
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- Time-mated females were purchased, the first batch consisting of 78 animals followed by the second batch of 52 animals one day later. The first batch is referred to as batch A and the second batch as batch B.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: daily
- Cage side observations checked: signs of reaction to treatment
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: All animals were weighed initially (Day 1 of pregnancy for group A and Day 2 for group A and B) and on Day 3, 6, 8, 10, 12 14, 16, 18 and 20.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Food consumption for each animal determined and mean daily diet consumption calculated as g food/kg body weight/day: No
- Compound intake calculated as time-weighted averages from the consumption and body weight gain data: No
Food consumption was measured from weigh day to weigh day.
WATER CONSUMPTION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Water consumption was measured daily from Day 2 to Day 20 of pregnancy inclusive.
POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes
- Sacrifice on gestation day 20
- Organs examined: Uterus and ovaries
On Day 20 of pregnancy the animals were sacrificed, dissected and examined for congenital abnormalities and macroscopic pathological changes in maternal organs. Abnormal tissues were preserved. The ovaries and uteri were examined immediately. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No data
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: Yes
- Number of late resorptions: Yes - Blood sampling:
- - Plasma: No
- Fetal examinations:
- External examinations: Yes: all per litter
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Head examinations: Yes: half per litter
- Anogenital distance of all live rodent pups: no - Statistics:
- Analyses were performed on litter data. Tests were two-tailed.
- Litter data: Basic sample unit was the litter, and due to the preponderance of non-normal distributions, non-parametric analyses proved most consistent.
Mean values of litter size, pre- and post implantation loss, litter weight, mean pup weight, sex ratios and the incidence of anomalous offspring were analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Intergroup comparisons were made by the non-parametric equivalent of the ‘t’ test together with the Jonckheere test for an ordered series of treatments.
Where 75% of the values for a given variable consisted of one value, a Fisher’s exact test was used.
- Water, food and bodyweight data: Analysis of variance, followed by Williams’ test were used for assessing Intergroup differences in absolute values for mean water and food consumption and bodyweight during gestation. - Indices:
- In assessing litter parameters, pre-implantation loss was calculated as a percentage as:
((No. of corpora lutea - no. of implantations) x 100)/ No. of corpora lutea
Post implantation loss was calculated as:
((No. of implantations - no. of live young) x 100)/ No. of implantations - Historical control data:
- Historical control data were not provided.
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment at 64 mg/kg bw/day was associated with slight post-dosing salivation and hair loss. At 16 mg/kg bw/day, two animals showed slight post-dosing salivation. There were no obvious treatment-related signs at 4 or 1 mg/kg bw/day.
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was an initial slight body weight loss from Day 6 to Day 8 in 13/23 and 20/24 dams at 64 and 16 mg/kg bw/day, respectively, against a combined incidence of 0/69 in the control, 1 and 4 mg/kg bw/day dose group. Body weight values of dams adjusted for body weight at Day 6 were statistically significantly lower than the controls through the study period at 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day.
Body weight gain at 64 mg/kg bw/day was slightly retarded to Day 16 and parity with controls was not regained by termination. At 16 mg/kg bw/day body weight gain to Day 16 paralleled controls. Body weight gain at 1 and 4 mg/kg bw/day was similar to controls.
For details, please refer to attachment 1 under "Overall remarks, attachments" and to table 1 under "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment at 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day was associated with a dosage-related decrease in mean food consumption throughout the dosing period; differences from controls attained statistical significance. At the end of treatment appetite returned and was similar to controls. Treatment at 1 and 4 mg/kg bw/day did not noticeably affect mean food consumption.
For details, please refer to attachment 2 under "Overall remarks, attachments" and to table 1 under "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Treatment at 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day was associated with a dose-related increased water consumption throughout the dosing period. Differences from controls attained statistical significance; during the post-dosing period (Days 16 to 19) mean consumption was similar to controls. At 4 mg/kg bw/day mean water consumption during the dosing period was marginally higher than the control, but differences were not statistically significant.
For details, please refer to attachment 2 under "Overall remarks, attachments" and to table 1 under "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Endocrine findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No obvious treatment-related macroscopic changes were detected at terminal autopsy.
- Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- not specified
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Although slight intergroup variation in mean pre- and post-implantation losses were observed when compared to the control group, no statistically significance was obtained and no clear dose-dependency was observed. The implantation rate was coparable among all groups.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments" - Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There was no instance of total resorption during the study.
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No significant difference in early or late resorption was observed in any of the treatment groups compared to the control.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments" - Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No statistically significant difference in the number of death foetuses was observed in any of the treatment groups compared to the control.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments" - Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No statistically significant changes in the number of pregnant rats were observed in any of the treatment groups compared to the control. In the control, 4, 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day dose groups were 2, 1, 3, 2 and 1 rats non-pregnant out of 25 females, respectively.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments" - Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (maternal animals)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- general toxicity
- Effect level:
- 4 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed at this dose level
- Remarks on result:
- other: main study (ZIR 15/24/89137)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal general toxicity
- Effect level:
- 16 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- water consumption and compound intake
- Remarks on result:
- other: main study (ZIR 15/24/89137)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 64 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effect observed at the highest dose level tested
- Remarks on result:
- other: main study (ZIR 15/24/89137)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- general toxicity
- Effect level:
- 8 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed at this dose level
- Remarks on result:
- other: supplementary study (PFX 002/033719)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- general toxicity
- Effect level:
- 16 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- clinical signs
- food consumption and compound intake
- Remarks on result:
- other: supplementary study (PFX 002/033719)
Maternal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Mean fetal body weight showed a dose-dependent reduction and reached statistical significance at 64 mg/kg bw/day when compared to the control group, which was reflected in the low mean litter weight. Therefore, the effect was considered to be related to the treatment with the test substance, but represents a secondary effect due to maternal toxicity observed at the highest dose tested.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments" and to table 2 under "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- No difference in the number of live offspring were observed in any of the treatment groups when compared to the control group.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments". - Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Sex ratio was similar among both control and treated animals.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments". - Changes in litter size and weights:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- The slight intergroup variation in litter size was not considered treatment-related. Mean litter size at 64 mg/kg bw/day was identical to the control value. However, the litter weight was statistically significantly decreased in the high-dose group when compared to the control group. In the other treatment groups, no statistically significant difference compared to the control was observed. The reduction in litter weight in the high-dose group was considered to be related to the treatment with the test substance, but represents a secondary effect due to maternal toxicity observed at the highest dose tested.
For details, please refer to attachment 3 under "Overall remarks, attachments" and to table 2 under "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Anogenital distance of all rodent fetuses:
- not examined
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- External malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Malformations:
Observed external malformations included microphthalmia observed in 1/255 foetusses in the low-dose group and 1/272 foetusses in the high-dose group, both which are considered incidental.
For details, please refer to attachment 4 under "Overall remarks, attachments". - Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Malformations and anomalies:
No treatment-related skeletal malformations were observed during the study. The incidence of malformed foetuses was 4, 2, 1, 1 and 4 in control, 1, 4, 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day dose groups.
The incidence of foetuses with skeletal anomalies was similar in both control and treated groups.
Variants:
The marginally higher incidence of foetuses at 64 mg/kg bw/day with unossified sternebrae was probably related to the lower foetal weight. Differences in percentage incidence were not statistically significant. Treatment at 1, 4 and 16 mg/kg bw/day was not considered to affect the occurrence of skeletal variants. The incidences of skeletal variants were not statistically significantly different from the control.
For details, please refer to attachment 4 under "Overall remarks, attachments". - Visceral malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Malformations and anomalies:
Visceral malformations observed included cardiac, situs inversus and anals atresia, diaphragmatic hernia and umbilicial hernia. These malformations only occured in one fetus and were considered incidental.
The incidence of foetuses with visceral anomalies was marginally higher at 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day compared with controls. This increase was not dose-related but 5/133 and 5/134 foetuses at 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/d respectively showed thinning of the diaphragm/protrusion of the liver. Although a high proportion of foetuses at the two top doses showed the same visceral anomaly the relationship to treatment is not clear as no foetuses at these doses showed diaphragmatic hernia.
For details on visceral malformations, please refer to attachment 4 under "Overall remarks, attachments" and to table 2 under "Any other information on results incl. tables".
Effects of the test substance on the development of diaphragm in foetuses were further investigated in an supplementary study, which can be found under "Any other information on results incl. tables". - Other effects:
- not examined
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 4 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects observed at this dose level
- Remarks on result:
- other: main study (ZIR 15/24/891371 Part I)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 16 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- fetal/pup body weight changes
- visceral malformations
- Remarks on result:
- other: main study (ZIR 15/24/891371 Part I)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 16 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no adverse effects at this dose level
- Remarks on result:
- other: supplementary study (PFX 002/033719)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- LOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental toxicity
- Effect level:
- 64 mg/kg bw/day
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- visceral malformations
- Remarks on result:
- other: supplementary study (PFX 002/033719)
Fetal abnormalities
- Key result
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Localisation:
- other: visceral/soft tissue: thinning of the diaphragm
- Description (incidence and severity):
- the incidence of diaphragmatic thinning was lower in the offspring than in foetus; no incidence of development into diaphragmatic hernia was observed
Overall developmental toxicity
- Key result
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 16 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- developmental effects as a secondary non-specific consequence of maternal toxicity effects
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
- Relevant for humans:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 Maternal toxic effects |
||||||
Parameter |
0 mg/kg |
1 mg/kg |
4 mg/kg |
16 mg/kg |
64 mg/kg |
Dose-response +/– |
Number of dams examined |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
25 |
|
Mean water consumption (Day 6-15) |
|
|
(↑) |
↑** |
↑** |
– |
Mean food consumption |
|
|
|
↓** |
↓** |
+ |
Bodyweight loss with retarded weight gain |
No |
No |
No |
Yes** |
Yes** |
+ |
**p 0.01 Williams' test |
||||||
|
||||||
Table 2 Embryo toxic effects |
||||||
Parameter |
0 mg/kg |
1 mg/kg |
4 mg/kg |
16 mg/kg |
64 mg/kg |
Dose-response +/– |
Number of foetuses examined |
126 |
125 |
123 |
133 |
134 |
|
Litter weight |
|
|
|
|
↓* |
– |
Mean foetal weight |
|
|
|
|
↓*** |
+ |
Incidence of foetuses with visceral anomalies |
8.3% |
4.9% |
6.9% |
14.9% |
12.2% |
– |
Thinning of diaphragm (no. of foetus affected) |
|
|
1 |
5 |
5 |
– |
* p 0.05 ***p 0.001 Jonckheere statistic |
Supplementary study to report ZIR 15/24/891371: Investigation of the incidence of diaphragmatic thinning and diaphragmagic hernia in the fetuses and offspring of CD rats treated by oral gavage during organogenesis (supplementary study to report)
An additional study was conducted with the
objective to investigate the influence of the test substance on the
development of the diaphragm in the fetus, with specific reference to
diaphragmatic thinning and diaphragmatic hernia recorded in fetuses in
an earlier study (1990). In order to monitor the subsequent progression
of this particular abnormality postnatally, similar observations were
made on culled offspring at Day 4 of age and on weanling offspring from
females allowed to litter. Treatment of the parental females was
restricted to the period of organogenesis (Days 6 - 15 post coitum) to
match the period of treatment in the original study. The test substance
was administered during the organogenesis phase (Days 6 - 15) of
pregnancy to rats. Three groups of 44 mated female rats received the
test item by oral gavage at dosages 0, 8, 16 or 64 mg/kg bw/day from
Days 6 - 15 after mating. Twenty two females in each group were
sacrificed on Day 20 after mating for fetal examination and the
remaining females were allowed to litter to permit examination of
offspring on Day 4 and 21 of age.
Clinical signs, body weight and food consumption were monitored. Adult
females were examined macroscopically at necropsy on Day 20 after mating
or after weaning. Fetuses were examined macroscopically at necropsy and
subsequently by detailed examination of the diaphragm after fixation.
Offspring received detailed examinations of the diaphragm at either Day
4 or Day 21 of age.
Females receiving 64 mg/kg bw/day of the test substance showed reduced
activity, piloerection, reduced body temperature and partially closed
eyelids approximately 6 h after dose administration on the first day of
treatment only and sporadic incidences of increased salivation and rales
were recorded at later stages through the dosing period. There were no
deaths. There was marked body weight loss in the early treatment period
and a marked reduction in food intake. Food intake and body weight gain
remained low throughout treatment and animals were much lighter than
controls at necropsy on Day 20 of gestation. Females allowed to litter
continued to recover body weight relative to controls during the
lactation period. Live litter size was slightly low at Day 20 post
coitum, but this was not confirmed in animals allowed to litter. Litter
weight and fetal weight were low at Day 20 post coitum, but the females
that were allowed to litter showed an increase in gestation length by
approximately 24 h so that offspring weights at Day 1 post partum were
similar to control values. Survival and growth of the offspring was
unaffected by treatment administered to the dams during the
organogenesis phase of pregnancy. The incidence of diaphragmatic
thinning with protrusion of the liver into the thorax in the region of
the central ligament (30%) was approximately twice the incidence seen in
controls (17%). The incidence of this anomaly in offspring at Day 4 or
21 of age was about 9%, whereas the observed control incidence was 1 or
3% at Day 4 and Day 21, respectively. There were no cases of
diaphragmatic hernia but the liver and diaphragm tended to become fused
together where there was protrusion of the liver through a thin portion
of the diaphragm.
At 16 mg/kg bw/day, approximately 25% of females were cold 6 h after
dosing on the first day of treatment, but there were minimal other
clinical signs of reaction to dosing. One female was killed for humane
reasons on Day 11 of gestation because of marked respiratory distress
and reduced activity.
Animals lost weight during the first few days of treatment, overall
weight gain and food consumption during treatment was low but the
animals recovered between the end of treatment at Day 15 and necropsy at
Day 20 of gestation. Body weight of females at the start of lactation
remained low, but there was a degree of recovery towards the end of
lactation. Live litter size was slightly low at Day 20 post-coitum, but
this was not confirmed in animals allowed to litter. The incidence of
diaphragmatic thinning with protrusion of the liver was similar to
control at all examination stages and declined with increasing age of
the offspring.
At 8 mg/kg bw/day there were no significant clinical signs, although
food intake during early treatment and body weight gain throughout
treatment were slightly low compared to control. Litter and fetal
parameters at Day 20 of gestation were unaffected by treatment. There
was a minor extension of gestation length but post partum litter
parameters for females allowed to give birth were unaffected by maternal
treatment. The incidence of diaphragmatic thinning with protrusion of
the liver was similar to control at all examination stages and declined
with increasing age of the offspring. There was a single incidence of
diaphragmatic hernia at Day 21 of age but in the absence of cases at
higher levels this was considered to be unrelated to treatment. For
detailed litter data with respect to diaphragmatic anomalies, please
refer to attachment 5 under "Overall remarks, attachments".
In the subsequent oral teratogenicity study for
the investigation of the incidence of diaphragmatic thinning and
diaphragmatic hernia in the foetuses and offspring of rats, the NOAEL
for maternal toxicity was 8 mg/kg bw/day, based on decreased body weight
and food consumption and clinical signs. The NOAEL for developmental
toxicity was 16 mg/kg bw/day based on increased incidence of the
thinning on the diaphragm at 64 mg/kg bw/day. The incidence was lower in
the offspring than in foetus and there was no incidence of development
into diaphragmatic hernia.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The current study was not performed under GLP conditions, but similar to guideline 414 (adopted in 2018). Deviations to the current OECD guideline included that the treatment was restricted to the period of organogenesis and did not cover the complete gestation, only 4 days of acclimation period, anogenital distance was not measured, gravid uterus weights were not noted, no historical control data were provided and parameters related to the detection of endocrine disrupting potential (thyroid weights, thyroid histopathology and thyroid hormons) were not examined as there were not required at the time the study was conducted, no special attention paid to reproductive tract of foetusses.
In conclusion, treatment with the test substance at 16 and 64 mg/kg bw/day exhibited effects on foetal and litter weight, but there was no indication of any teratogenic effect. There was no effect of treatment, maternal or foetal, at 4 mg/kg bw/day and below.
In the present oral teratogenicity study in rats, the NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 4 mg/kg bw/day based on decreased body weight and food and water consumption at 16 mg/kg bw/day and above. The NOAEL for maternal developmental toxicity was 64 mg/kg bw/day as no adverse effect were observed up to the highest dose level tested. Foetuses showed diaphragmatic thinning in the mid- and high-dose groups. Further, reduced body weight and litter weights at the highest dose tested was observed, which is considered secondary due to maternal toxicity. However, the NOAEL for developmental effects (foetuses) was set to 4 mg/kg bw/day. No teratogenic effect was observed.
An additional study (GLP-compliant) was conducted with the objective to investigate the influence of the test substance on the development of the diaphragm in the fetus, with specific reference to diaphragmatic thinning and diaphragmatic hernia recorded in fetuses in the previous study. In order to monitor the subsequent progression of this particular abnormality postnatally, similar observations were made on culled offspring at Day 4 of age and on weanling offspring from females allowed to litter. Treatment of the parental females was restricted to the period of organogenesis (Days 6 - 15 post coitum) to match the period of treatment in the original study. Female rats received the test item by oral gavage at dosages 0, 8, 16 or 64 mg/kg bw/day from Days 6 - 15 after mating. Twenty two females in each group were sacrificed on Day 20 after mating for fetal examination and the remaining females were allowed to litter to permit examination of offspring on Day 4 and 21 of age.
The majority of the changes in the diaphragm were small, but with the fixation process these shape changes were apparent when the foetus was sectioned. There was a clear indication in the current study that the incidence of diaphragmatic thinning with protrusion of the liver was increased in foetuses of females, which had been treated with 64 mg/kg bw/day during organogenesis. This would be consistent with the findings from the original study. There was no evidence, however, of any increase in the incidence of diaphragmatic thinning at 8 and 16 mg/kg bw/day, despite the detailed examinations and the fact that the numbers of fetuses examined was almost three times greater than in the original study and post partum offspring were also examined. The incidence of diaphragmatic changes was lower in the offspring than in the fetus and although this was still apparent at weaning there was no evidence that diaphragmatic thinning developed into diaphragmatic hernia after birth or that growth or survival of the offspring “at risk” was compromised. However, the observerd increasing incidences of diaphragmatic changes were related to systemic maternal toxicity, as treatment of pregnant rats with the test substance at levels of 16 or 64 mg/kg bw/day has marked effects on the mothers (dose-related reductions in food intake and body weight loss/reduced gain during treatment). Fetal weight was also reduced at 64 mg/kg bw/day.
In conclusion, the results of the detailed examinations of the fetuses/offspring in the current study clearly show that it is possible to detect high frequencies of cases where the diaphragm appears thin and the liver protrudes slightly through the diaphragm causing a bulge to appear in the cranial surface of the liver. There was an incidence of approximately 30% in fetuses from dams treated at 64 mg/kg bw/day, with about 14 - 17% incidence in controls and groups treated with 8 and 16 mg/kg bw/day. The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 8 mg/kg bw/day, based on decreased body weight and food consumption and clinical signs. The NOAEL for developmental toxicity was 16 mg/kg bw/day, based on increased incidence of the thinning on the diaphragm at 64 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.