Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
November 13, 1981 - December 2, 1981
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Refer to the section 13 of IUCLID dataset for details on the read across justification. The acute oral toxicity study with the read across substance is considered sufficient to fulfil the information requirements as further explained in the provided endpoint summary
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Tif: RAIf (SPF), F3-crosses of RII 1/Tif x RII 2/Tif
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: CIBA-GEIGY Ltd., Tierfarm, CH-4332 Sisseln
- Age at study initiation: 7 to 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 163 - 190 g
- Fasting period before study: over night, prior to dosing
- Housing: groups of 5 in macrolon cages type 3 with standardized soft wood bedding
- Diet: rat food, Nafag No. 890
- Acclimation period: 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 +/- 3
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 15
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
polyethylene glycol
Details on oral exposure:
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 ml/kg bw
Doses:
5000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days or until all symptoms have disappeared, whichever lasts longer
- Frequency of observations: daily
- Frequency of weighing: on days 1, 7, 14 and at death
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Statistics:
For the body weights, the group means and their standard deviation were calculated.
The LD50 including the 95 % confidence limit were computed by the logit method.
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 5 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
1 female animal died 2 days post application.
Clinical signs:
other: Dyspnoea, ruffled fur and curved body position were observed directly after application and lasted up to day 7 post application. For several hours or days, respectivley, sedation and diarrhoea was also observed. All clinical signs were reversible within t
Gross pathology:
No compound related gross organ changes were observed.

Dose (mg/kg bw)

Day 1

Day 7

Day 14

 

Males

5000

182 (5.8)

206 (9.3)

250 (15.7)

 

Females

5000

171 (5.2)

178 (6.9)

202 ( 5.5)

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Upon an acute oral administration and a 14 day post-treatment observation period, an LD50 of > 5000 mg/kg bw was determined in the rat.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the acute oral toxicity of the read-across substance amines, C11-14-branched alkyl, monohexyl and dihexyl phosphates according to OECD Guideline 401, under GLP conditions. Groups of 5 rats per sex were administered the test substance at an oral gavage dose of 5000 mg/kg bw and observed for 14 days post dose for mortality, clinical signs, and body weight. Following observation period, the treated animals were sacrificed to observe gross pathological signs in the internal organs. No mortality was observed througout the study. Under the study conditions, the acute oral LD50 of the substance was determined to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bw (Sarasin, 1981).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
5 000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
GLP compliance:
not specified
Test type:
fixed dose procedure
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Tif:RAIf(SPF), F3-crosses of RII 1/Tif X RII 2/Tif
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Source of animals: CIBA-GEIGY LTD. Tierfarm, 4334 Sisseln, Switzerland
Initiral body weight range: 177-239 g
Initial age: 7-8 weeks
Husbandry: The animals were kept under conventional laboratory conditions. They were caged individually in Macrolon cages type 2 with standardized soft wood bedding (Societe Parisienne des
sciures, Pantin). The animal room was air conditionned: temperature 22+3C, relative humidity 55±15%, 12 hours light/day, approximately 15 air changes/h.
Food: NAFAG No. 890, NAFAG AG, Gossau, SG (Switzerland),and water were provided ad libitum.
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Duration of exposure:
24 h
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Key result
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Under the study conditions, the acute dermal LD50 of the substance was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity of the substance according to OECD Guideline 402, under GLP conditions. Groups of 5 rats per sex were administered the test substance at a topical dose of 2000 mg/kg bw on the shaved skin of the back with a semiocclusive bandage. The exposure was for 24 h following which the test substance was washed with water and the treated animals were observed for 14 days post dose for mortality, clinical signs, and body weight. Following observation period, the treated animals were sacrificed to observe gross pathological signs in the internal organs. No mortality was observed througout the study. Under the study conditions, the acute dermal LD50 of the substance was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (Kobel, 1984).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

A study was conducted to determine the acute oral toxicity of the read-across substance amines, C11-14-branched alkyl, monohexyl and dihexyl phosphates according to OECD Guideline 401, under GLP conditions. Groups of 5 rats per sex were administered the test substance at an oral gavage dose of 5000 mg/kg bw and observed for 14 days post dose for mortality, clinical signs, and body weight. Following observation period, the treated animals were sacrificed to observe gross pathological signs in the internal organs. No mortality was observed througout the study. Under the study conditions, the acute oral LD50 of the substance was determined to be greater than 5000 mg/kg bw (Sarasin, 1981).

A study was conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity of the read-across substance amines, C11-14-branched alkyl, monohexyl and dihexyl phosphates according to OECD Guideline 402, under GLP conditions. Groups of 5 rats per sex were administered the test substance at a topical dose of 2000 mg/kg bw on the shaved skin of the back with a semiocclusive bandage. The exposure was for 24 h following which the test substance was washed with water and the treated animals were observed for 14 days post dose for mortality, clinical signs, and body weight. Following observation period, the treated animals were sacrificed to observe gross pathological signs in the internal organs. No mortality was observed througout the study. Under the study conditions, the acute dermal LD50 of the substance was determined to be greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (Kobel, 1984).

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the results of the read across studies through oral and dermal routes, the substance does not warrant any classification according to EU CLP (1272/2008/EC) criteria.