Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-795-1 | CAS number: 99-86-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to microorganisms
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- activated sludge respiration inhibition testing
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 November 2019 - 02 December 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Test method according to OECD Guideline 209. GLP study.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 209 (Activated Sludge, Respiration Inhibition Test (Carbon and Ammonium Oxidation))
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: the test item was directly (using micro-syringes) introduced into the test vessels. - Test organisms (species):
- activated sludge of a predominantly domestic sewage
- Details on inoculum:
- - Name and location of sewage treatment plant where inoculum was collected:
City of Warsaw's sewage treatment plant ”Czajka”
- Preparation of inoculum for exposure: A sample of an activated sludge was taken from the exit of the aeration tank of the treatment plant ”Czajka”. The sludge was used as collected but coarse particles were removed by settling for a short period and decanting the upper layer of finer solids. The sludge was decanted for a period (15 minutes) to produce a clear supernatant and pellet of sewage solids. The supernatant liquid was discarded and the sludge was resuspended in chlorine-free tap water, with shaking and aeration, and the wash-water was removed by decantation and discarding again. The washing and decantation process was repeated four times. The dry mass of a known volume (100 ml) of the re-suspended sludge was determined and the sludge concentrated by removing liquor or diluted further in chlorine-free tap water to obtain the required sludge solids concentration of 3 g/L. The activated sludge was continuously aerated (1 L/minute) at the test temperature, and was used on the next day. The sludge was fed daily with the synthetic sewage feed (50 mL synthetic sewage feed/L activated sludge) for two additional days. The sludge was then used for the test.
- Initial biomass concentration: 3g/L - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 3 h
- Test temperature:
- 20 ± 2°C
- pH:
- The pH of the mixtures of test item after the 3 hour incubation was between 7.36 and 8.14.
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 60 – 70% saturation
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0 (control), 0.17, 1.0, 10.0, 100.0 and 1000.0 mg/L.
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel:
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Glass beakers with a nominal volume of 1000 mL
- Aeration: The beakers were aerated continuously. Clean, oil-free air. Air flow 0.5 to 1 litre/minute.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): Three
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): Six (total respiration), six (heterotrophic respiration) and two (nitrification)
- No. of vessels per abiotic control (replicates): one
- Sludge concentration (weight of dry solids per volume): 1.5 g/L
- Nutrients provided for bacteria: synthetic sewage feed (50 mL synthetic sewage feed/L activated sludge)
- Nitrification inhibitor used (delete if not applicable): N-allylthiourea
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: The deionised water was used and chlorine–free tap water for activated sludge washing.
- Intervals of water quality measurement: pH was measured at the beginning and at the end of the exposure period. The concentration of dissolved oxygen was continuously measured and recorded for a 10 minute period, until the oxygen concentration falls below 2 mg/l.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: Yes
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
Inhibition of total oxygen uptake: At the end of 3 hour incubations, samples were withdrawn to measure the rate of decrease of the concentration of dissolved oxygen in a completely filled BOD bottle. The measurements were made individually. A sample from the first aeration vessel was transferred to fill a BOD bottle and the concentration of dissolved oxygen was immediately measured with the self-stirring oxygen electrode. From the data collected, the specific respiration rates of the control and test mixtures were calculated; the percentage inhibition was then calculated.
Differentiation between inhibition of heterotrophic respiration and nitrification: The use of the specific nitrification inhibitor N-allylthiourea (ATU) enabled the direct assessment of the inhibitory effects of test item on heterotrophic oxidation, and by subtracting the oxygen uptake rate in the presence of ATU from the total uptake rate (no ATU present), the effects on the rate of nitrification were calculated. Two sets of reaction mixtures were prepared, but additionally, ATU was added to each mixture of one set at a final concentration of 11.6 mg/l, which is known to inhibit nitrification completely in sludge with suspended solids concentrations of up to 3000 mg/l. The oxygen uptake rates was measured after the exposure period; these direct values represent heterotrophic respiration only, and the differences between these and the corresponding total respiration rates represent nitrification. The various degrees of inhibition were then calculated.
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: geometric serie with ratio of 10 - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- (3,5-dichlorophenol)
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Remarks on result:
- other: As in the measured substance content range of 0.17-1000 mg/L the obtained inhibition of dissolved part of test item is less than 50%, it is assumed that EC50 > 1000 mg/L.
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 452 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of total respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 271 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of heterotrophic respiration
- Key result
- Duration:
- 3 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 340 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- inhibition of nitrification rate
- Details on results:
- - Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: not applicable.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: the undissolved test item content, visible for test item content above its water solubility, had no significant effect on the inhibition values.
- Adsorption (e.g. of test material to the walls of the test container): not observed.
- Blank controls oxygen uptake rate: >20 mg/gh in control replicates for test item and reference item.
- Coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake rate in control replicates: <30% in control replicates for test item and reference item. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- Relevant effect levels:
The calculated values of the end points EC50 for the reference item were found to be:
1. Total respiration inhibition: 4.2 mg/L which lies in the range 2 mg/l to 25 mg/l according to validity criteria.
2. Heterotrophic respiration inhibition: 13.4 mg/L which lies in the range 5 mg/l to 40 mg/l of validity criteria.
3. Nitrification inhibition: 1.29 mg/L which is in the range 0.1 mg/l to 10 mg/l according to validity criteria. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- (results for the reference substance are within the acceptable range; blank controls oxygen uptake rate was less than 20 mg O2/gram of activated sludge in an hour; coefficient of variation of oxygen uptake rate in control replicates is less than 30%)
- Conclusions:
- The EC50 was determined to be greater than 1000 mg/L as the inhibition of the disolved part of test item was less than 50% for the range of concentrations tested. EC10 was calculated to be 452 mg/L.
- Executive summary:
The study of activated sludge respiration inhibition was carried out according with OECD Guideline 209, using activated sludge from a sewage treatment plant treating predominantly domestic sewage. The inhibition of three different oxygen uptakes was determined, total, heterotrophic only and due to nitrification. The microbial inoculum was a preparation of activated sludge adjusted to 1.5 g suspended solids per litre in the test vessels. The respiration rates of samples of activated sludge fed with synthetic sewage were measured in an enclosed cell containing an oxygen electrode after a contact time (incubation) of 3 hours. Five concentrations of the test substance (0.17, 1, 10, 100 and 1000 mg/L) were tested versus blank controls. As positive control substance 3,5-dichlorophenol was used and it was tested in five concentrations (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 10.0 and 100.0 mg/L). All the validity criteria were found to lie in the ranges allowed. The EC50 was expected to be greater than 1000 mg/L as the inhibition of the disolved part of test item was less than 50% for the range of concentrations tested and the undissolved part, visible for test item content above the substance water solubility, had no significant effect on the inhibition values. The EC10 was calculated to be 452 mg/L.
Reference
Table 5. Test item total respiration; time-related oxygen concentrations (mg/L)
time, min |
0.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
10.0 |
bottle # |
|||||||||||
1– FB1 |
7.51 |
6.80 |
6.22 |
5.63 |
5.06 |
4.46 |
3.87 |
3.27 |
2.70 |
2.11 |
- |
2 – FT1/0.17 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.89 |
6.32 |
5.74 |
5.17 |
4.61 |
4.03 |
3.46 |
2.90 |
2.31 |
1.76 |
3 – FT2/0.17 mg/L |
7.55 |
6.93 |
6.37 |
5.80 |
5.24 |
4.68 |
4.12 |
3.56 |
2.95 |
2.41 |
1.86 |
4 – FT3/0.17 mg/L |
7.55 |
6.97 |
6.42 |
5.86 |
5.30 |
4.74 |
4.18 |
3.61 |
3.05 |
2.48 |
1.94 |
5 – FB2 |
7.54 |
6.83 |
6.17 |
5.53 |
4.90 |
4.24 |
3.63 |
2.99 |
2.57 |
1.99 |
- |
6 – FT1/1.0 mg/L |
7.55 |
6.98 |
6.41 |
5.85 |
5.28 |
4.70 |
4.13 |
3.56 |
2.99 |
2.42 |
1.86 |
7 – FT2/1.0 mg/L |
7.54 |
6.91 |
6.35 |
5.77 |
5.20 |
4.61 |
4.04 |
3.47 |
2.89 |
2.30 |
- |
8 – FT3/1.0 mg/L |
7.56 |
6.94 |
6.28 |
5.75 |
5.17 |
4.57 |
3.99 |
3.39 |
2.80 |
2.20 |
1.63 |
9 – FB3 |
7.56 |
6.91 |
6.27 |
5.64 |
4.99 |
4.36 |
3.72 |
3.09 |
2.46 |
1.83 |
- |
10 – FT1/10.0 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.64 |
6.03 |
5.42 |
4.81 |
4.17 |
3.55 |
2.81 |
2.46 |
- |
- |
11 – FT2/10.0 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.76 |
6.12 |
5.48 |
4.83 |
4.18 |
3.52 |
2.88 |
2.43 |
- |
- |
12 – FT3/10.0 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.83 |
6.18 |
5.55 |
4.90 |
4.25 |
3.63 |
2.99 |
2.35 |
- |
- |
13 – FB4 |
7.50 |
6.63 |
5.96 |
5.27 |
4.57 |
3.90 |
3.21 |
2.54 |
1.86 |
- |
- |
14 – FT1/100.0mg/L |
7.50 |
6.87 |
6.23 |
5.56 |
4.92 |
4.27 |
3.62 |
2.97 |
2.34 |
- |
- |
15 – FT2/100.0mg/L |
7.50 |
6.35 |
5.65 |
4.98 |
4.30 |
3.61 |
2.96 |
2.29 |
- |
- |
- |
16 – FT3/100.0mg/L |
7.50 |
6.60 |
5.95 |
5.28 |
4.59 |
3.89 |
3.30 |
2.63 |
1.99 |
- |
- |
17 – FB5 |
7.50 |
6.72 |
6.02 |
5.29 |
4.59 |
3.89 |
3.15 |
2.50 |
1.80 |
- |
- |
18 – FT1/1000 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.31 |
5.67 |
5.05 |
4.42 |
3.81 |
3.20 |
2.58 |
1.96 |
- |
- |
19– FT2/1000 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.84 |
6.22 |
5.67 |
5.11 |
4.53 |
3.98 |
3.41 |
2.84 |
2.28 |
- |
20 – FT3/1000 mg/L |
7.50 |
6.22 |
5.63 |
5.06 |
4.45 |
3.88 |
3.28 |
2.70 |
2.11 |
- |
- |
21 – FB6 |
7.50 |
6.77 |
6.10 |
5.41 |
4.72 |
4.04 |
3.34 |
2.67 |
2.00 |
- |
- |
Table 6. Test item heterotrophic respiration; time-related oxygen concentrations (mg/L)
Time, min |
0.0 |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
6.0 |
7.0 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
10.0 |
bottle # |
|||||||||||
1 – FB7 |
8.00 |
7.33 |
6.76 |
6.21 |
5.80 |
5.14 |
4.69 |
4.23 |
3.57 |
3.17 |
2.35 |
2 – FHB1 |
8.20 |
8.01 |
7.79 |
7.58 |
7.35 |
7.13 |
6.92 |
6.71 |
6.49 |
6.27 |
6.05 |
3 – FH1/0.17 mg/L |
8.20 |
7.99 |
7.72 |
7.51 |
7.28 |
7.08 |
6.88 |
6.65 |
6.46 |
6.25 |
6.04 |
4 – FH2/0.17 mg/L |
8.20 |
7.98 |
7.77 |
7.54 |
7.33 |
7.11 |
6.89 |
6.68 |
6.46 |
6.24 |
6.02 |
5 – FH3/0.17 mg/L |
8.20 |
7.99 |
7.76 |
7.56 |
7.34 |
7.15 |
6.92 |
6.72 |
6.48 |
6.27 |
6.05 |
6 – FHB2 |
8.20 |
7.96 |
7.71 |
7.48 |
7.24 |
7.02 |
6.79 |
6.55 |
6.33 |
6.10 |
5.85 |
7 – FH1/1.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.29 |
8.09 |
7.86 |
7.66 |
7.45 |
7.25 |
7.04 |
6.82 |
6.61 |
6.40 |
8 – FH2/1.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.29 |
8.08 |
7.87 |
7.65 |
7.44 |
7.23 |
7.03 |
6.82 |
6.61 |
6.38 |
9 – FH3/1.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.29 |
8.08 |
7.88 |
7.67 |
7.46 |
7.25 |
7.05 |
6.85 |
6.64 |
6.40 |
10 – FHB3 |
8.30 |
8.06 |
7.82 |
7.57 |
7.34 |
7.10 |
6.86 |
6.63 |
6.38 |
6.14 |
5.90 |
11 – FH1/10.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.28 |
8.05 |
7.82 |
7.60 |
7.38 |
7.15 |
6.95 |
6.72 |
6.49 |
6.27 |
12 – FH2/10.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.27 |
8.06 |
7.84 |
7.62 |
7.40 |
7.18 |
6.96 |
6.74 |
6.50 |
6.28 |
13 – FH3/10.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.28 |
8.07 |
7.85 |
7.63 |
7.42 |
7.20 |
6.98 |
6.75 |
6.52 |
6.30 |
14 – FHB4 |
8.30 |
8.05 |
7.82 |
7.59 |
7.36 |
7.08 |
6.84 |
6.60 |
6.34 |
6.10 |
5.86 |
15 – FH1/100.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.23 |
7.99 |
7.76 |
7.53 |
7.31 |
7.08 |
6.84 |
6.66 |
6.37 |
6.15 |
16 – FH2/100.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.27 |
8.02 |
7.81 |
7.61 |
7.38 |
7.14 |
6.93 |
6.71 |
6.49 |
6.25 |
17 – FH3/100.0 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.19 |
7.97 |
7.76 |
7.54 |
7.32 |
7.10 |
6.86 |
6.68 |
6.40 |
6.17 |
18 – FHB5 |
8.30 |
8.04 |
7.79 |
7.54 |
7.29 |
7.03 |
6.79 |
6.54 |
6.27 |
6.02 |
5.78 |
19– FH1/1000 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.30 |
8.10 |
7.88 |
7.66 |
7.45 |
7.24 |
7.03 |
6.81 |
6.60 |
6.37 |
20 – FH2/1000 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.20 |
7.97 |
7.77 |
7.54 |
7.34 |
7.11 |
6.90 |
6.68 |
6.45 |
6.23 |
21 – FH3/1000 mg/L |
8.50 |
8.28 |
8.07 |
7.85 |
7.66 |
7.43 |
7.22 |
7.01 |
6.80 |
6.57 |
6.35 |
22 – FHB6 |
8.50 |
8.24 |
7.99 |
7.73 |
7.49 |
7.23 |
6.98 |
6.73 |
6.48 |
6.22 |
5.95 |
23 – FB8 |
8.00 |
7.34 |
6.73 |
6.20 |
5.78 |
5.18 |
4.62 |
4.13 |
3.55 |
2.90 |
2.23 |
Table 7. Test item. Calculation of percentage of inhibition
Test item total respiration inhibition |
||
Average oxygen consumption rate from FB1 and FB2 equals 36.60 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RT. mg/Lh |
IT. % |
2 – FT1/0.17 mg/L |
34.35 |
6.15 |
3– FT2/0.17 mg/L |
34.14 |
6.72 |
4 – FT3/0.17mg/L |
33.66 |
8.03 |
Average |
35.05 ± 0.35 |
6.97 ± 0.96 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FB2 and FB3 equals 37.70 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RT. mg/Lh |
IT. % |
6 – FT1/1.0 mg/L |
34.14 |
9.44 |
7 – FT2/1.0 mg/L |
34.93 |
7.35 |
8– FT3/1.0 mg/L |
35.73 |
5.22 |
Average |
34.93 ± 0.79 |
7.34 ± 2.11 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FB3 and FB4 equals 40.25 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RT. mg/Lh |
IT. % |
10 – FT1/10.0 mg/L |
35.83 |
10.98 |
11 – FT2/10.0 mg/L |
37.11 |
7.80 |
12 – FT3/10.0 mg/L |
38.63 |
4.02 |
Average |
37.19 ± 1.40 |
7.60 ± 3.48 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FB4 and FB5 equals 42.52 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RT. mg/Lh |
IT. % |
14 – FT1/100.0mg/L |
38.70 |
8.98 |
15 – FT2/100.0 mg/L |
40.60 |
4.52 |
16 – FT3/100.0 mg/L |
39.51 |
7.08 |
Average |
39.60 ± 0.95 |
6.86 ± 2.24 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FB5 and FB6 equals 42.00 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RT. mg/Lh |
IT. % |
18 – FT1/1000 mg/L |
37.29 |
11.21 |
19– FT2/1000 mg/L |
34.20 |
18.57 |
20 – FT3/1000 mg/L |
35.23 |
16.12 |
Average |
35.57 ± 1.57 |
15.30 ± 3.75 |
Test item heterotrophic respiration inhibition |
||
Average oxygen consumption rate from FHB1 and FHB2 equals 13.50 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RH. mg/Lh |
IH. % |
3 – FH1/0.17 mg/L |
12.96 |
4.00 |
4 – FH2/0.17 mg/L |
13.08 |
3.11 |
5 – FH3/0.17 mg/L |
12.90 |
4.44 |
Average |
12.98 ± 0.09 |
3.85 ± 0.68 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FHB2 and FHB3 equals 14.01 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RH. mg/Lh |
IH. % |
7 – FH1/1.0 mg/L |
13.20 |
5.78 |
8 – FH2/1.0 mg/L |
13.02 |
7.07 |
9 – FH3/1.0 mg/L |
13.20 |
5.78 |
Average |
13.14 ± 0.10 |
6.21 ± 0.74 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FHB3 and FHB4 equals 14.28 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RH. mg/Lh |
IH. % |
11 – FH1/10.0 mg/L |
13.38 |
6.30 |
12 – FH2/10.0 mg/L |
13.32 |
4.03 |
13 – FH3/10.0 mg/L |
13.20 |
4.54 |
Average |
13.30 ± 0.09 |
4.96 ± 1.19 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FHB4 and FHB5 equals 14.88 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RH. mg/Lh |
IH. % |
15 – FH1/100.0 mg/L |
14.10 |
5.24 |
16 – FH2/100.0 mg/L |
13.50 |
9.27 |
17 – FH3/100.0 mg/L |
13.98 |
6.05 |
Average |
13.86 ± 0.32 |
6.85 ± 2.13 |
Average oxygen consumption rate from FHB5 and FHB6 equals 15.21 mg/Lh was taken for the calculations |
||
Bottle # |
RT. mg/Lh |
IH. % |
19– FH1/1000 mg/L |
12.78 |
15.98 |
20 – FH2/1000 mg/L |
13.62 |
10.45 |
21 – FH3/1000 mg/L |
12.90 |
15.19 |
Average |
13.10 ± 0.45 |
13.87 ± 3.00 |
Table 8. Percentage of test item nitrification inhibition
Test item concentration. mg/L of test item |
IN. % |
0.17 |
8.79 |
1.0 |
8.02 |
10.0 |
8.01 |
100.0 |
6.87 |
1000 |
16.12 |
FB: blank control total respiration test substance
FT: total respiration test substance
FH: heterotrophic respiration test substance
FHB: blank control heterotrophic respiration test substance
RT: total respiration
RH: Heterotrophic respiration
IT: percentage inhibition of total oxygen consumption
IH: percentage inhibition of heterotrophic oxygen uptake
An average value of oxygen uptake due to sludge nitrification was 19.53 mg/Lh.
The following end points ECX (mg/L) were determined for total, heterotrophic and nitrification inhibition. The EC50 was expected to be greater than 1000 mg/L.
Inhibition |
ECx. mg/L |
||
EC5 |
EC10 |
EC15 |
|
Total respiration |
- |
452 |
- |
Heterotrophic respiration |
3.4 |
271 |
- |
Nitrification |
- |
340 |
899 |
Description of key information
Key study: Test method according to OECD 209. GLP study: The EC50 was determined to be greater than 1000 mg/L as the inhibition of the disolved part of test item was less than 50% for the range of concentrations tested. EC10 was calculated to be 452 mg/L.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC50 for microorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/L
- EC10 or NOEC for microorganisms:
- 452 mg/L
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.