Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 412-780-3 | CAS number: 1380226-46-9 ADDITIV 104
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- April to August 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study performed according to guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 222 (Earthworm Reproduction Test (Eisenia fetida/Eisenia andrei))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Date of inspection 29 June 2010
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
Not applicable - Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Details on sampling:
- Not applicable
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- Additiv 104 treatment solutions prepared in n-hexane and mixed into fine quartz sand, before allowing the solvent to evaporate in a fume hood. A ratio of 10g of sand / kg soil (dry weight equivalent) was used. Deionised water was added and mixed to the soil to achieve the required test moisture content of ca.42% of the MWHC.
Control samples were treated with the equivalent amount of deionised water and quartz sand only. Solvent control samples were treated with the equivalent amount of n-hexane and quartz sand. A bulk sample of soil was prepared for each treatment group and mixed thoroughly in a Crypto Peerless mixer to ensure even distribution of the sand and water.
Treatments were mixed in the following order: control (deionised water only), solvent control, and then the Additiv 104 treatment rate. The bulk samples of soil were then divided between the replicate test vessels so that each vessel held 500 ± 5 g dry weight of soil. - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Earthworm; E. fetida
- Source: Taken from cultures held at CEMAS.
- Age at test initiation (mean and range, SD): 6 months old (approx.). The worms were selected from an age-synchronised culture with a homogenous age structure. Individuals did not differ in age by more than 4 weeks.
- Weight at test initiation: individual wet weights of 250 - 600 mg and with visible clitellum
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 3 days in an artificial soil substrate
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same as test
- Feeding: ad libitum with finely ground oatmeal (Gold Organic Oats, Mornflake Ltd., Crewe, UK) moistened with deionised water. - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 56 d
- Remarks:
- Adult mortality and growth was assessed at Day 28 (days after treatment). Soil and cocoons were returned to the test vessels and left for a further 28 days.
- Test temperature:
- 20+/- Celcius. Monitored throughout the study.
- pH:
- 6.0 +/- 0.5h
- Moisture:
- ca. 42% of the maximum water holding capacity. Monitored by weighing a nominated replicate vessels from each treatment two or three times a week.
- Details on test conditions:
- With a 16 h photoperiod and an illumination of 402 - 547 Lux at the level of the test vessels.
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentration - 1000 mg/kg dry soil weight
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- separate study with carbendazim
- Duration:
- 28 d
- Dose descriptor:
- LD0
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: no unusual behavioural or morphology effects were observed in any treatment
- Duration:
- 56 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: Statistical analysis showed no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the Additiv 104 treatment rate of 1000 mg/kg dry soil and the solvent control treatment for juvenile production at Day 56 (Homoscedastic two-tailed t test, ToxCalc TM g
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period: None at Day 28
- Total mass of adults at beginning of test: Range of Day 0 total body weights per vessel 3.98 - 5.03 g
- Changes in body weigth of live adults (% of initial weight) at end of exposure period: Day 28: -2% to 15.9%
- No. of offspring produced: 98.1 (controls) ; 81.5 (solvent control); 74.4 (1000mg/kg soil (dw))
- No. of unhatched cocoons: 22 (controls) ; 36 (solvent control); 25 (1000mg/kg soil (dw))
- Morphological abnormalities: None
- Behavioural abnormalities: None - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Percentage mortality of the adult worms at Day 28 was determined for each of the treatments. In addition, the percentage change in mean live weight from Day 0 to Day 28 was calculated, along with the number of juveniles (and a measure of the coefficient of variation) produced by Day 56.
The mortality, live weight and juvenile production data generated were subject to statistical analysis using ToxCalc (TM)(1999). see tables in following section. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Control CoV for juvenile production was greater than stated in guideline. Juvenile production in this test higher than previously seen by the test lab. Statistical analysis did not identify any outliers. This is not considered to affect validity of study.
- Conclusions:
- No mortality was observed in the control treatments or in the treatment rate of 1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil on Day 28. As such, the EC50 for adult mortality was >1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil. The NOEC for reproduction was >1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil.
Statistical analysis showed there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the Additiv 104 treatment rate of 1000 mg/kg dry soil and the solvent control treatment for juvenile production at Day 56. The EC50 was determined as >1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil. - Executive summary:
The chronic reproductive toxicity of Additiv 104 in earthworms has been tested according to OECD testing guideline 222. Based on a range-finding study, it was considered appropriate to carry out as a limit test at 1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil.
No mortality was observed in the control treatments or in the treatment rate of 1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil on Day 28. As such, the EC50for adult mortality was >1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil.
Statistical analysis showed there were no significant differences (p>0.05) between the Additiv 104 treatment rate of 1000 mg/kg dry soiland the solvent control treatment for adult live weight on Day 28.
Statistical analysis showed there were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the Additiv 104 treatment rate of 1000 mg/kg dry soiland the solvent control treatment for juvenile production at Day 56. The EC50was determined as >1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soil.
Reference
Transform: Untransformed | 2-Tailed | |||||||||||
Conc-mg/Kg | Mean | N-Mean | Mean | Min | Max | CV% | N | t-Stat | Critical | MSD | ||
D-Control | 98.125 | 1.2040 | 98.125 | 54.000 | 151.000 | 34.082 | 8 | |||||
S-Control | 81.500 | 1.0000 | 81.500 | 54.000 | 149.000 | 40.446 | 8 | |||||
1000 | 74.375 | 0.9126 | 74.375 | 46.000 | 102.000 | 29.263 | 8 | 0.510 | 2.145 | 29.953 | ||
Auxiliary Tests | Statistic | Critical | Skew | Kurt | ||||||||
Shapiro-Wilk's Test indicates normal distribution (p > 0.01) | 0.88424 | 0.844 | 1.02626 | 0.9017 | ||||||||
F-Test indicates equal variances (p = 0.30) | 2.29381 | 8.88539 | ||||||||||
The control means are not significantly different (p = 0.33) | 1.00139 | 2.14479 | ||||||||||
Hypothesis Test (2-tail, 0.05) | MSDu | MSDp | MSB | MSE | F-Prob | df | ||||||
Homoscedastic t Test indicates no significant differences | 29.9529 | 0.36752 | 203.063 | 780.134 | 0.61787 | 1, 14 |
Description of key information
A study is available that has evaluated the effects of Additiv 104 on the survival, growth and reproduction of adult earthworms, Eisenia fetida Savigny. The study was conducted to meet the requirements specified in OECD Guideline 222 (2004). NOEC > 1000 mg Additiv 104/kg soil (dw)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Long-term EC10, LC10 or NOEC for soil macroorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
This study determined the effects of Additiv 104 on the survival, growth and reproduction of adult earthworms, Eisenia fetidaSavigny (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae). The study was conducted to meet the requirements specified in OECD Guideline 222 (2004).
Based on the results of a range-finding test (where rates
of 0.1, 1.0, 10, 100 and 1000 mg Additiv 104/kg dry soilwere
evaluated) a limit test was carried out where an artificial soil
substrate was treated with a single concentration of 1000 mg Additiv
104/kg dry soil. Additiv 104 treatment solutions were
prepared in
n-hexane and these were thoroughly mixed into the soil substrate
with a volume of deionised water to achieve a targeted final moisture
content of 42% of the Maximum Water Holding Capacity (MWHC).
The Additiv 104 treatment was compared with a deionised water control treatment and a solvent (n-hexane ) control treatment. Eight replicate vessels were prepared for each treatment each containing 500 g (dry weight equivalent) of soil. For all treatments, the soil moisture content was maintained at approximately 42% MWHC throughout the study.
Ten adult E. fetida (approximately 6 months old, 250 -600 mg fresh weight and with a clitellum) were weighed and placed onto the surface of the soil substrate in each test vessel. One day after treatment (DAT), approximately 5 g of finely ground oatmeal was mixed with 10 mL of deionised water and poured onto the soil surface of each test vessel. Thereafter, food was replenished on a weekly basis during the first four weeks of the study. At 28 DAT, worms were removed and adult mortality and live weights were recorded. A final 5 g of food was incorporated into the soil substrate before being returned to the test vessels and left for a further 28 days. At Day 56, the number of juveniles hatched from the cocoons and unhatched cocoon numbers were determined.
The 28 DAT mortality data are summarised below. There were no statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the Additiv 104 treatment rate of 1000 mg/kg dry soiland the solvent control treatment for live weight on Day 28. On Day 28, no unusual behavioural or morphology effects were observed in any treatment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.