Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Bioaccumulation: aquatic / sediment
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- bioaccumulation in aquatic species: fish
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- July 10, 2009 -January 12, 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Study conducted in compliance with GLP standards
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Yakushokuhatsu No.1121002, Heisei 15.11.13 Seikyoku No.2, Kanpokihatsu No.031121002, November 21, 2003; the latest revision, November 20, 2006
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- The bioconcentration test system was set up in duplicate for different concentrations and two groups of carp were kept in water containing the test substance. In addition, the system was also set up for control and a group of carp was kept in water without the test substance.
From the result of the preliminary acute toxicity test with Medaka, the 50% lethal concentration (LC50) for 96 hours of the test substance was >20 mg/L. Therefore the bioconcentration test was accordingly conducted at exposure concentration levels of 0.2 and 0.02 mg/L, less than a hundredth and a thousandth of the 96-hour LCso - Test organisms (species):
- Cyprinus carpio
- Details on test organisms:
- Acute Toxicity Test:
Species: Medaka (Oryzias latipes)
Source: Tunashima Fishing Corp. 18-1 Tunashima-nishi 5-chome, Kouhoku-ku, Yokohama-city, Kanagawa, Japan
Pre-acclimation: At the start of acclimation, visual observation was made and abnormal fish was removed. The remaining normal fish were
reared in an aquarium with flowing water.
Body length: 2 ± 1 cm
Body weight: Approximately 0.2 g
Acclimation: Aquarium number: C-12, Water temperature: 24 ± 1°C, Period: June 23, 2009 to July 13, 2009, Feeding: The food (Tetramin® from Tetra Werke) was given in an amount of 2% of the fish weight everyday. (Feeding was discontinued during the 24 hours before testing.)
Mortality during the 1 week before testing: <5%
Medication during acclimation: None
Bioconcentration Test Method
Species: Carp (Cyprinus carpio)
Source: Niikura Fish Farm, 1217, Shimoya, Isehara-city, Kanagawa, Japan
Pre-acclimation: At the start of acclimation, visual observation was made and abnormal fish were removed. The remaining normal fish were then reared in an aquarium with flowing water.
Total length: 8 + 4 cm
Body weight: Approximately 6 g
Age: About a year after hatching
Acclimation : Aquarium number: A-6, Water temperature: 24 ± 2°C, Period: June 16, 2009 to July 24, 2009, Food: Babygold® from Kyorin , Feeding: The food was given in an amount of 1.5% of the fish weight everyday, Mortality during the 1 week before testing: <5%
Medication during acclimation: None - Route of exposure:
- aqueous
- Total exposure / uptake duration:
- 62 d
- Hardness:
- no data
- Test temperature:
- 24±2°C
- pH:
- 6.0 — 8.5
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 6.9-8.3 mg/L
- TOC:
- no data
- Salinity:
- no data
- Details on test conditions:
- - Supply of test water: Continuous flow-through dilution system
- Exposure level (nominal concentrations of the test substance)
High concentration level: 0.2 mg/L (Vehicle concentration, Tetrahydrofuran: 50 ppm [v/v])
Low concentration level: 0.02 mg/L (Vehicle concentration, Tetrahydrofuran: 50 ppm [v/v])
Control: 0 mg/L (Vehicle concentration, Tetrahydrofuran: 50 ppm [v/v])
- Supply of dilution water: 400 L/day (Turnover rate: 8 times/day)
- Supply of feed solution: 20 mL/day
-Number of fish (at the start of the exposure period):
High concentration level: 36 fish in 50-L test water (>1 L/day/g)
Low concentration level: 36 fish in 50-L test water (>1 L/day/g)
Control: 12 fish in 50-L test water (>1 L/day/g)
- Water temperature: 24±2°C
- Dissolved oxygen: >60% of the saturation (>5 mg/L at 24°C)
- Aeration: Continuous
- pH: 6.0 — 8.5
- Lighting: Approximately 16 hr/day
(Hf fluorescent lamp with wavelengths of 400-700 nm)
- Exposure period: 62 days - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Test substance in test water (nominal concentrations)
High concentration level: 0.2 mg/L
Low concentration level: 0.02 mg/L
Control: 0 mg/L
Vehicles in test water
High concentration level: Tetrahydrofuran 50 ppm (v/v)
Low concentration level: Tetrahydrofuran 50 ppm (v/v)
Control: Tetrahydrofuran 50 ppm (v/v) - Details on estimation of bioconcentration:
- Calculation of Bioconcentration Factors
The bioconcentration factor (BCF) was calculated by the following equation:
BCF. = Cf. Cw,n
The steady-state bioconcentration factor (BCFss) is calculated by the following
equation:
BCFss = Cf,s Cw,s
Where
BCF,,: The bioconcentration factor after n days, BCFss: The steady-state bioconcentration factor, Cf: Concentration of the test substance in test fish after n days (p.g/g); Mean concentration of the test substance in test water over n days (mg/L), Cts: Mean concentration in test fish at steady-state (p.g/g), Cw,s: Mean concentration in test water at steady-state (mg/L)
Steady-state: Steady-state is decided to be reached, when three successive BCF at intervals of 48 hours or longer are within 20% of each other. Cts and Cw,s are calculated from last three successive data.
When the obtained BCF are all less than 100, it is also considered that steady-state is reached. In this case, three successive BCF are not
necessary within 20% of each other. The BCFss is not calculated by above equation and BCFss is just declared "< (maximum BCF value) "or
< (maximum BCF value). - Key result
- Remarks on result:
- other: see tabulated results below
- Details on results:
- During the test period, there was no abnormality in shape of the body or in swimming and eating behavior in the fish at all the concentration levels throughout the test period. Therefore, it was confirmed that the test fish had been reared appropriately.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- Bioconcentration factors were determined for the test substance that is a multicomponent substance-High concentration level - A= BCFSS 56 (49-75*1), B= BCFSS < 87 (<60-87*2), C=BCFSS < 39 (<7-39*2) , D=BCFSS < 39 (3-39*2) and Low concentration level - A=BCFSS < 90 (<59-90*2), B=BCF < 667 (<623-<667*3), C=BCFSS < 64 (<62-<64*2), D=BCFSS < 33 (<31-<33*2)
- Executive summary:
This study was conducted to evaluate the bioaccumulation potential of the test substance for notification under the Chemical Substances Control Law of Japan. The bioconcentration test system was set up in duplicate for different concentrations ( 0.2 mg/L, 0.02 mg/L and control ) and two groups of carp were kept in water containing the test substance. During the exposure period, the concentrations of the test substance in water and fish were measured periodically. The bioconcentration factors (BCF) calculated from the results were used to evaluate bioaccumulation potential of the test substance in tissues of fish. The test substance was multi component substance (A,B,C,D), so the measureable 4 components (m/z: 504.4, 520.4, 782.6, 810.6) were analyzed and the bioaccumulation potential was judged. The BCF of a test substance in test fish were as follow: High concentration level - A= BCFSS 56 (49-75*1), B= BCFSS < 87 (<60-87*2), C=BCFSS < 39 (<7-39*2) , D=BCFSS < 39 (3-39*2) and Low concentration level - A=BCFSS < 90 (<59-90*2), B=BCF < 667 (<623-<667*3), C=BCFSS < 64 (<62-<64*2), D=BCFSS < 33 (<31-<33*2) where BCFSS: The steady-state bioconcentration factor, *: Range of BCF and judgmental reason
*1: The variation of mean BCF at the last three concecutive mesurement (over 48 hrs) were confirmed to fall within ±20%, the concentration factor was considered to reach the steady-state during 62 days of exposure period.
*2: The variation of mean BCF at the three consecutive measurements were not confirmed to fall within ±20%. However all of the BCF values during the exsposure period were less than 100, thus the BCF were considered to reach the steady-state.
*3: The variation of mean BCF at the last three consecutive measurements (over 48 hrs) of component B were not confirmed to fall within ±20%, and did not juge to reach the steady-state. Therefore the BCF value was not calculated.
Reference
Component | High Concentration level | Low Concentration Level |
A | BCFSS 56 (49-75*1) | BCFSS <90 (<59 -90*2) |
B | BCFSS < 87 (<60 -87*2) | BCF < 667 (< 623 -<667 *3) |
C | BCFSS< 39 (<7 -39*2) | BCFSS <64 (< 62 -<64 *2) |
D | BCFSS< 39 (3 -39*2) | BCFSS < 33 (<31 -<33 *2) |
*1: The variation of mean BCF at the last three concecutive mesurement (over 48 hrs) were confirmed to fall within ±20%, the concentration factor was considered to reach the steady-state during 62 days of exposure period. *2: The variation of mean BCF at the three consecutive measurements were not confirmed to fall within ±20%. However all of the BCF values during the exsposure period were less than 100, thus the BCF were considered to reach the steady-state. *3: The variation of mean BCF at the last three consecutive measurements (over 48 hrs) of component B were not confirmed to fall within ±20%, and did not juge to reach the steady-state. Therefore the BCF value was not calculated.
Description of key information
Bioconcentration factors were determined for the test substance that is a multicomponent substance-High concentration level - A= BCFSS 56 (49-75*1), B= BCFSS < 87 (<60-87*2), C=BCFSS < 39 (<7-39*2) , D=BCFSS < 39 (3-39*2) and Low concentration level - A=BCFSS < 90 (<59-90*2), B=BCF < 667 (<623-<667*3), C=BCFSS < 64 (<62-<64*2), D=BCFSS < 33 (<31-<33*2)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A GLP study was conducted to evaluate the bioaccumulation potential of the test substance for notification under the Chemical Substances Control Law of Japan. The bioconcentration test system was set up in duplicate for different concentrations ( 0.2 mg/L, 0.02 mg/L and control ) and two groups of carp were kept in water containing the test substance. During the exposure period, the concentrations of the test substance in water and fish were measured periodically. The bioconcentration factors (BCF) calculated from the results were used to evaluate bioaccumulation potential of the test substance in tissues of fish. The test substance was multi component substance (A,B,C,D), so the measureable 4 components (m/z: 504.4, 520.4, 782.6, 810.6) were analyzed and the bioaccumulation potential was judged. The BCF of a test substance in test fish were as follow: High concentration level - A= BCFSS 56 (49-75*1), B= BCFSS < 87 (<60-87*2), C=BCFSS < 39 (<7-39*2) , D=BCFSS < 39 (3-39*2) and Low concentration level - A=BCFSS < 90 (<59-90*2), B=BCF < 667 (<623-<667*3), C=BCFSS < 64 (<62-<64*2), D=BCFSS < 33 (<31-<33*2)
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.