Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 915-316-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- no data
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Study conducted before GLP principles (1978). The study did not fully follow the requirements of current Guideline OECD 474, but was performed according to acceptable scientific principles. No concurrent positive controls were used. No information is available on purity of test substance.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 978
- Report date:
- 1978
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Boller K. & Schmid W. (1970); Schmid W. (1975)
- Deviations:
- not applicable
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Generally similar to OECD 474 with limited endpoints examined.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Reaction mass of 1-phenyloctadecane-1,3-dione and phenylicosane-1,3-dione
- EC Number:
- 915-316-2
- Molecular formula:
- C50H80O4
- IUPAC Name:
- Reaction mass of 1-phenyloctadecane-1,3-dione and phenylicosane-1,3-dione
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- Swiss
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: no data
- Assigned to test groups randomly: no data
- Fasting period before study: no data
- Housing: no data
- Diet: no data
- Water: no data
- Acclimation period: no data
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): no data
- Humidity (%): no data
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): no data
IN-LIFE DATES: no data
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: arachis oil
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: no data
- Concentration of test material in vehicle: 40 and 100 mg/mL (suspension was obtrained at the highest dose)
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): no data
- Type and concentration of dispersant aid (if powder): not applicable
- Lot/batch no. (if required): no data
- Purity:no data - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: no data
DIET PREPARATION: not applicable (gavage) - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Not applicable (sacrifice 6-hours after the second gavage)
- Frequency of treatment:
- Two gavage doses with an interval of 24 hours
- Post exposure period:
- 6-hour before sacrifice
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
1000 and 2500 mg/kg b.w.
Basis:
other: nominal dose administered as gavage
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 males/dose at both doses and 10 males for the negative control group (see Table 7.6.2/1).
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- No. Results were compared with those from known mutagens under similar conditions: benzene, benzo(a)pyrene; methylmethanesulphonate
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Femurs were dissected from each animal to remove the bone marrow in order to obtain cell suspension (see Table 7.6.2/2).
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: up to the highest obtainable suspension in the vehicle
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields):no data
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: a drop of cell suspension was spread onto a slide to prepare a smear in the conventional manner. This smear is dried and stained by the MayGrunwald-Giemsa technique.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: the stained smears were examined to determine the incidence of micronucleated cells per 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes/animal by observing 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes on a different slide. The mean is then established for these two readings.
OTHER: no data - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive response is normally indicated by an increase in the incidence of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes for the treatment group compared with the concurrent negative control group.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: no data
The sensitivity of the method was indicated by values obtained under the same experimental conditions and with the same strain of mice, for three knwon admininstered as gavage (benzene, benzo(a)pyrene, methylmethane). - Statistics:
- No data.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- other: by comparison with known mutagen values obtained in previous studies under the same conditions
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY: no
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY: see Table 7.6.2/3
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.6.2/3: Tissues and cells examined after 24-hour and 48-hour sampling time
Conditions |
Negative control* |
Low dose (1000 mg/kg b.w.) |
High dose (2500 mg/kg b.w.) |
Positive control |
|
Number of cells evaluated |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
Sampling time (h) |
6 hours |
||||
Ratio of erythrocytes |
polychromatic / (normochromatic + polychromatic) |
- |
- |
- |
- |
polychromatic with micronuclei / polychromatic |
0.23 |
0.22 |
0.17 |
** |
|
Normochromatic with micronuclei / normochromatic |
- |
- |
- |
- |
*Arachis oil
**Values from known mutagens in similar conditions of test: Benzene: 1.31±0.44%;
Benzo(a)pyrene: 4.51%±0.60%;methylmethane sulfonate 1.76%
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Stearoylbenzoylmethane showed no evidence of causing chromosome damage or bone marrow cell toxicity at doses up to limit dose levels. - Executive summary:
Bone marrow micronucleus assay was conducted in Swiss mouse according to the micronucleus test. The study was conducted before mutagenic test guidelines and good laboratory guidelines (1978). Animals (10 males/test substance dose, 10 males for the negative control) were treated by gavage with Stearoylbenzoylmethane at 1000 and 2500 mg/kg bw (the highest obtainable suspension in Arachis oil) as two doses administered with an interval of 24 hours. Bone marrow cells were harvested at 6 hours post-treatment for all dose groups.
Ten males were treated by gavage with arachis oil as concurrent vehicle negative control group. Bone marrow cells were harvested at 6-hour post-treatment and 2000 cells per dose group were examined.
There were no signs of toxicity during the study, at doses up to and above the 2000 mg/kg limit dose specified in OECD 474. There was no increase in the frequency of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes in bone marrow by comparison with results from negative control animals.
Under the conditions of the in vivo test, stearoylbenzoylmethane showed no evidence of causing chromosome damage or bone marrow cell toxicity.
This study is classified as acceptable, although it does not fully satisfy all the requirements for the current Test Guideline OECD 474 for in vivo cytogenetic mutagenicity data. This study is considering as key study for this endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.