Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / micronucleus study
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 487 (In vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test)
Version / remarks:
July 22, 2010
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Harlan Cytotest Cell Research GmbH, Rossdorf, Germany
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-ethylpropylamine
EC Number:
243-573-4
EC Name:
N-ethylpropylamine
Cas Number:
20193-20-8
Molecular formula:
C5H13N
IUPAC Name:
N-ethylpropan-1-amine
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): N-ethylpropylamine
- Physical state: Liquid, colorless, clear
- Analytical purity: 89.3%
- BASF Test Item No.: 05/0042-3
- Lot/batch No.: B987 19.05.2011
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: May 19, 2013
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature, light protected

Method

Target gene:
Not applicable
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Type and identity of media: MEM (minimal essential medium) containing Hank’s salts, glutamine, Hepes (25 mM) and 10 % (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS). Additionally, the medium was supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/mL/100 Ng/mL).
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not specified
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Phenobarbital/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I (4 h; -S9 /+S9): 2.1, 4.3, 8.6, 17.2, 34.4, 68.8, 137.5, 275.0, 550.0, 1100.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 275.0, 550.0, 1100.0 µg/mL)
- Experiment IIA (24 h; -S9): 2.1, 4.3, 8.6, 17.2, 34.4, 68.8, 137.5, 275.0, 550.0, 1100.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 68.8, 137.5, 275.0 µg/mL)
- Experiment IIA (4 h; +S9): 34.4, 68.8, 137.5, 275.0, 550.0, 1100.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 68.8, 137.5, 275.0, 1100.0 µg/mL)
- Experiment IIB (24 h; -S9): 50.0, 100.0, 150.0, 200.0, 225.0, 250.0, 275.0, 300.0, 325.0, 350.0, 400.0, 550.0 µg/mL (evaluated: 250.0, 275.0, 300.0, 325.0, 350.0, 400.0, 550.0 µg/mL)
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
mitomycin C
other: Griseofulvin
Remarks:
-S9: MMC: 0.3 µg/mL (in deionised water), Griseofulvin: 8.0 µg/mL (in DMSO); +S9: CPA: 15.0 µg/mL (in saline);
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium

DURATION
- Exposure duration: Experiment I (-/+S9): 4 h, Experiment IIA (-S9): 24 h, Experiment IIA (+S9): 4 h, Experiment IIB (-S9): 24 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 h

STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giemsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: two parallel cultures

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 1000

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: proliferation index

Evaluation criteria:
Acceptability of the assay:
The micronucleus assay is considered acceptable if it meets the following criteria:
a) The number of micronucleated cells carrying one or more micronuclei found in the solvent controls falls within the range of the historical laboratory control data range.
b) The micronucleus frequency in the positive controls is statistically significantly increased.
c) The quality of the slides must allow the evaluation of a sufficient number of analyzable cells.

Evaluation of results
A test item can be classified as mutagenic if: the number of micronucleated cells is not in the range of the historical control data and either a concentration-related increase in three test groups or a statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed.
A test item can be classified as non-mutagenic if: the number of micronucleated cells in all evaluated test groups is in the range of the historical control data and no statistically significant or concentration-related increase in the number of micronucleated cells is observed in comparison to the respective solvent control.
Statistics:
Statistical significance was confirmed by means of the Chi square test.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
positive
Remarks:
Experiment I: no mutagenicity; Experiment IIA: statistically significant increase (2.58%) at 275.0 µg/mL (dose-dependent increase); Experiment IIB: statistically significant increases at 325.0, 400.0 and 550.0 µg/mL (1.20, 2.20, 3.55 and 3.50 %)
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
Experiment IIA (concentrations showing clear cytotoxic effects were not evaluable for cytogenetic damage)
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: The pH was adjusted to physiological values using small amounts of 2 N HCl in Experiment I at 1100.0 µg/mL, in Experiment IIA at 550.0 and 1100.0 µg/mL and in Experiment IIB at 550.0 µg/mL.
- Effects of osmolality: No effects observed.
- Water solubility: soluble
- Precipitation: No precipitation observed.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: With respect to the molecular weight of the test item and the preliminary purity of 85 %, 1100.0 µg/mL of N-ethylpropylamine was applied as top concentration for treatment of the cultures in the pre-test. Test item concentrations between 2.1 and 1100.0 µg/mL (with and without S9 mix) were chosen for the evaluation of cytotoxicity. No precipitation of the test item was observed. Since the cultures fulfilled the requirements for cytogenetic evaluation, this preliminary test was designated Experiment I. Since no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration, 1100.0 µg/mL was chosen as top treatment concentration for Experiment IIA. To verify the positive results of Experiment IIA a confirmatory experiment (Exp. IIB) was performed.

COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In Experiment I in the absence and presence of S9 mix, in Experiment IIA in the presence of S9 mix and in the confirmatory experiment IIB in the absence of S9 mix, no cytotoxic effects were observed up to the highest applied concentration. In Experiment IIA in the absence of S9 mix concentrations showing clear cytotoxic effects were not evaluable for cytogenetic damage.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Exp.

Preparation interval

Test item concentration in µg/mL

Proliferation index

Micronucleated cells* in %

Exposure period 4 hrs without S9 mix

I

24 hrs

Water (10%)

2.97

0.95

 

 

Mitomycin C (0.3 µg/mL)

2.52

15.40s

 

 

275.0

2.86

0.80

 

 

550.0

2.78

1.50

 

 

1100.0

2.82

0.40

Exposure period 24 hrs without S9 mix

IIA

24 hrs

Water (10%)

3.27

0.6

 

 

Griseofulvin (8.0 µg/mL)

2.70

17.55s

 

 

68.8

3.20

0.50

 

 

137.5

3.16

1.10

 

 

275.0**

2.93

2.58s

IIB

24 hrs

Water (10%)

2.85

0.55

 

 

Griseofulvin (8.0 µg/mL)

2.59

8.75s

 

 

250.0

2.89

1.10

 

 

275.0

2.83

0.80

 

 

300.0

2.83

0.90

 

 

325.0

3.00

1.20s

 

 

350.0

2.95

2.20s

 

 

400.0

2.77

3.55s

 

 

550.0

2.42

3.50s

Exposure period 4 hrs with S9 mix

I

24 hrs

Water (10%)

1.81

1.15

 

 

CPA (15.0 µg/mL)

1.53

12.85s

 

 

275.0

1.88

1.55

 

 

550.0

1.89

1.25

 

 

1100.0

1.82

1.55

IIA

24 hrs

Water (10%)

2.43

1.30

 

 

CPA (15.0 µg/mL)

1.88

8.55s

 

 

68.8

2.65

1.60

 

 

137.5**

2.32

1.98

 

 

275.0

2.15

1.65

 

 

1100.0

2.22

1.05

* The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 2000 cells

** The number of micronucleated cells was determined in a sample of 4000 cells

sNumber of micronucleated cells statistically significantly higher than corresponding control values

In Experiment I no mutagenicity was observed with and without S9 mix. The rates of micronucleated cells after treatment with the test item (0.40 - 1.55%) were close to the rates of the solvent control values (0.95 - 1.15%) and within the range of the laboratory historical solvent control data. In Experiment IIA in the absence of S9 mix one statistically significant increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells (2.58%), clearly exceeding the historical solvent control data range (0.05 – 1.50%) was observed after 24 hrs treatment with 275.0 µg/mL. In addition, a dose-dependent increase was observed. In Experiment IIA in the presence of S9 mix one single increase in the percentage of micronucleated cells (1.98%) was observed at 137.5 µg/mL, slightly exceeding the historical solvent control data range (0.05 – 1.70%). However, this increase was neither statistically significant nor dose-dependent and was thus regarded as biologically irrelevant. In the confirmatory experiment IIB in the absence of S9 mix statistically significant increases in micronucleated cells were observed after treatment with 325.0, 350.0, 400.0 and 550.0 µg/mL (1.20, 2.20, 3.55 and 3.50%). The three highest evaluated concentrations clearly exceeded the laboratory historical control data range of 0.05 – 1.50 %. Therefore, the positive finding could be confirmed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Under the experimental conditions reported, the test item N-ethylpropylamine induced micronuclei in V79 cells (Chinese hamster cell line) in vitro in the absence of metabolic activation. Therefore, N-ethylpropylamine is considered to be mutagenic in this in vitro test system when tested up to the highest required or evaluable concentrations.