Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 243-573-4 | CAS number: 20193-20-8
Toxicological Summary
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 15 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 740 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
There are no adequate experimental data on the inhalation route available. Therefore, the worker-DNEL
long-term for inhalation route - systemic is derived from the NOAEL of 600 mg/kg bw/day, obtained in
the combined oral repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test in Wistar rats. The NOAECcorr. is calculated as follows:- standard respiratory volume (rat) = 0.38 m³/kg/8h
- standard respiratory volume (human) = 6.7 m³/8h
- worker respiratory volume = 10 m³/8h
- absorption (oral, rat) = 50 % (default)
- absorption (inhalative, human) = 100 % (default)
--> modified dose descriptor (corrected inhalatory NOAEC) = oral NOAEL/0.38 x (50/100) x (6.7/10) x
(7 exposure days/week; rat/5 exposure days/week; worker)- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance (starting point for the DNEL calculation is a NOAEL)
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 4
- Justification:
- According to the ECHA REACH Guidance an assessment factor (AF) of 6 should be used as default value for a subacute study and a factor of 2 for a sub-chronic study. The NOAEL used for hazard assessment was determined from a repeated dose study (combined with reproduction/ developmental toxicity screening test) where the animals were treated continuously for a period of up to 54 days, which is twice as long is in a subacute study. Thus, an assessment factor of 4 is used to extrapolate from this study duration to a chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance (worker)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance (good/standard quality of the database)
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 15 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- high hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown but no further hazard information necessary as no exposure expected
Additional information - General Population
Since the test substance is used at industrial domains only, no exposure of the general population is expected. Therefore no DNELs for the general population were calculated.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
