Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1980
Report date:
1980

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Draize Test (Federal Register 38, No. 187 § 1500.42 (eye), p. 27019, 23.09.1973):
0.10 mL of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye in each of 6 rabbits. The animals were observed after 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 7 d after installation. The eyes were not washed out.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N-ethylpropylamine
EC Number:
243-573-4
EC Name:
N-ethylpropylamine
Cas Number:
20193-20-8
Molecular formula:
C5H13N
IUPAC Name:
N-ethylpropan-1-amine
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Aethylpropylamin
- Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: 99 %

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
not specified
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3 - 4 kg
- Housing: individually
- Diet: standard pellet feed for rabbits ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: > 3 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21 - 23 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 - 70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


Test system

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
see Observation period (no washing conducted)
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
(animal 1-6)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3.4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
(within 7 days)
Remarks on result:
other: 5 animals with a corneal opacity score of 4 at the end of the observation period;
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
(animal 1 - 6)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
3.4
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 72 h (7 days after instillation: no data)
Remarks on result:
other: 7 days post application: purulent conjunctivae, in part necrotic with nasty smell; no chemosis score could be therefore determined on day 7;
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
(animal 1 - 6)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.5
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 72 h (7days after instillation: no data)
Remarks on result:
other: 7 days post application: purulent conjunctivae, in part necrotic with nasty smell; no iritis score could be therefore determined on day 7;
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
(animal 1 - 6)
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 days
Remarks on result:
other: Due to substance staining assessment not possible for animal 1, 3, 5, 6, 24 and 48 h after instillation. The mean was only calculated for the available scores.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The application of the test substance led initially to defense movement, pain cries and tightly shutting of the eyes. 24 h post application the eye was agglutinated by purulence and purulent discharge was noted. 7 days post application purulent conjunctivae, in part necrotic with nasty smell; 5 animals still showed corneal opacity score 4.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Findings:

animal 1/2/3/4/5/6

 Time  Opacity   Iritis   Erythema Chemosis Secretion      
 24 h 4/2/4/2/4/4    2/0/2/0/2/2  #/2/#/2/#/# 3/4/3/2/2/2  0/2/2/2/1/2      
 48 h 4/2/4/2/4/4   2/0/2/0/2/2 #/2/#/2/#/# 4/4/4/3/4/4 1/2/2/2/3/3      
 72 h 4/3/4/3/4/4    2/2/2/1/2/2 0/2/0/1/0/0 4/4/4/3/4/4  2/2/2/2/2/2       

#: due to substance staining assessment not possible.

Irritation Index >/= 88.3 (max. 110)

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (irreversible effects on the eye) based on GHS criteria