Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-780-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Key, gene mutation in bacteria, OECD 471, GLP, with and without S9: negative with and without S9
Key, Chromosomal abberation, OECD TG 473, GLP, with and without S9: negative with and without S9
Key, mammalian cell gene mutation, OECD 476, GLP, with and without S9: negative with and without S9
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 29 JAN 1997 - 28 FEB 1997
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- The study was performed in compliance with the Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) regulations (revised in 1997, ENV/MC/CHEM(98)17).The method followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (Adopted: 4 April 1984) No 471 "Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test".
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1995
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- HIS operon (S. thyphimurium), TRY operon (E. coli)
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Remarks:
- his G 46, uvrB, rfa
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: mutations in the histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Remarks:
- his C 3076, uvrB, rfa
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: mutations in the histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Remarks:
- his D 3052, uvrB, rfa + R-factor
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: mutations in the histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Remarks:
- his G 46, uvrB, rfa + R-factor
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: mutations in the histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Remarks:
- his G 428, rfa + R-factor
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: mutations in the histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2
- Remarks:
- his C 3076, uvrB, rfa
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: mutations in the tryptophan operon
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
rat liver homogenate (S9 mix) with standard co-factors with metabolic activation (Aroclor)
- source of S9 : The batches of the liver homogenate fraction (S9) used in this study were prepared at the Institute of Toxicology (room U9/1092) of MERCK KGaA, Darmstadt, from October 28 to November 01, 1996. The acceptance criterium was entirely met.
- method of preparation of S9 mix : Thom (Wistar) rats (aged 6-8 weeks) were given a single intraperitoneal Injection of Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg body weight) diluted in Miglyol 812 oil (MERCK, Article-No. 6175). The animals received drinking water and Altromin standard diet ad libitum. About 16 hours before sacrifice, the feed was removed. Five to seven days after application of Aroclor, the rats were sacrificed and the livers collected in ice-cooled sterilized beakers containing 0.15 M KCI. The livers were homogenized in a sterile glass potter homogenizer containing 3 ml of 0.15 M KCI per gram of liver wet-weight. The homogenate was spun at 9000 x g for 10 minutes at about +4°C and the supernatant fluid was decanted and transferred into sterilized and precooled plastic tubes. The S9 was then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -196°C.
- Composition and characterization of S9-Mix (quantity per mL S9-Mix):
1st series 2nd series
Liver homogenate (S9) 0.1 ml 0.2 mL
MgCI2/KCI aqueous solution (0.4 M/1.64 M) 0.02 mL 0.02 mL
Glucose-6-phosphate 1.5 mg 1.5 mg
NADP 3.15 mg 3.15 mg
Sodium phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 7.4) 0.5 mL 0.5 mL
Distilled water 0.38 mL 0.18 mL
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability). Every S9-batch is tested for its metabolic activity by the use of specific substrates, requiring different enzymes of the P450-isoenzyme family.
Components added to each plate:
Bacteria suspension 0.1ml
Test material (or solvent) 0.01-0.03 ml
Sodium phosphate buffer (in studies without metabolic activation) 0.5 ml
S9-Mix (in studies with metabolic activation) 0.5 ml
Top agar solution 2.0 ml - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The test material concentrations were used selected according to the EC and OECD guidelines for this test system and the requirements of the Labor Ministry of Japan:
1. Series: 5, 15.8, 50, 158, 500, 1580, and 5000 µg/plate
2. Series: 5, 15.8, 50, 158, and 500 µg/plate - Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- benzo(a)pyrene
- cumene hydroperoxide
- other: Daunomycin, 2-Aminoanthracene
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration (single, duplicate, triplicate) . triplicate
- Number of independent experiments : 2
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Test substance added in agar (plate incorporation) (experiment 1); preincubation (experiment 2)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Preincubation period, if applicable:
none (experiment 1), 20 min (experiment 2)
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment:
2 days
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background growth inhibition
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENTS OF GENOTOXICIY
Revertant colonies were either scored using an Artek M 880 colony counter or manually. The presence of a background lawn of non-revertant cells was checked for each plate. Tables of individual and mean values are generated by use of a validated, automated data processing program - Evaluation criteria:
- A test material is defined as non-mutagenic in this assay if "no" or "weak increases" occur in the first and second series of the main experiment. ("Weak increases" randomly occur due to experimental variation.) A test material is defined as mutagenic in this assay if: - a dose-related (over at least two test material concentrations) increase in the number of revertants is induced, the maximal effect is a "clear increase", and the effects are reproduced at similar concentration levels in the same test system;- "clear increases" occur at least at one test material concentration, higher concentrations show strong precipitation or cytotoxicity, and the effects are reproduced at the same concentration level in the same test system.In all further cases, a third test series with the bacterial strain in question should be performed. If the criteria for a positive test result are not fulfilled in at least two out of the three series, the test material is defined as being non-mutagenic in this test system.
- Statistics:
- n.a.
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: A weak precipitation of the test material on the agar plates was observed at concentrations > 50 µg/plate, a strong precipitation at concentrations > 500 µg/plate. Toxicity to the bacteria was not observed.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data
The negative control mutant frequencies were all in the regular range. Slight deviations from those values, if they occur, are accepted if they appear in only one test series and, furthermore, all other parameters of that series are in the regular range. The strain specific positive control compounds, namely daunomycin, N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 9-aminoacridine, and cumene hydroperoxide in the absence of S9-Mix, yielded the expected mutant frequencies that were greatly in excess of the negative controls. The genotype of the tester strains used was thus confirmed. 2-Aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene, which require metabolic activation, were strongly mutagenic. This indicates that the exogenous metabolizing system used in the present investigation (S9-Mix) was functioning.
Ames test:
- Signs of toxicity : No signs of toxicity were observed (no thinning of the background lawn)
- Individual plate counts : please refer to attached pdf
- Mean number of revertant colonies per plate and standard deviation : please refer to attached pdf
- Conclusions:
- According to the criteria for negative and positive results predetermined in the Study Protocol the test item was not mutagenic with and without metabolic activation (S9 mix) under the described experimental conditions.
- Executive summary:
The registered substance was tested for gene mutation according to OECD Guideline 471 following GLP.
Purpose
The purpose of this assay was to provide information on possible health hazards for the test material and serve as a rational basis for risk assessment to the genotoxic potential of the test item in man.
Study Design
The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test material were performed using Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from Aroclor 1254-pretreated rats was used. Two independent experimental series were performed.
Results
The test material was dissolved in acetone and tested at concentrations ranging from 5 to 5000 µg/plate. Precipitation of the test material on the agar plates occurred at concentrations 500 µg/plate. Toxicity to the bacteria was not observed.
Daunomycin, N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 9-aminoacridine and cumene hydroperoxide served as strain specific positive control test materials in the absence of S9 mix. 2-Aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene were used for testing the bacteria and the activity of the S9 mix. Each treatment with the test materials used as positive controls led to a clear increase in revertant colonies, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used.
In both series of experiments, each performed with and without the addition of rat liver S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test material showed no increase in the number of revertants of any bacterial strain. According to the criteria for negative and positive results predetermined in the Study Protocol, the test material was not mutagenic under the described experimental conditions.
Conclusion
With and without addition of S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test material was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18 DEC 2000 - 09 MAR 2001
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- This study was conducted according to Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) and followed the OECD Guideline for the testing of Chemicals: Genetic Toxicology: 473 In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 after induction using Aroclor 1254
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 10.2, 20.5, 40.9, 81.9, 164, 328, 655, 1310, and 2620 µg/mL medium
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- +S9
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- -S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- According to guideline
- Evaluation criteria:
- According to guideline
- Statistics:
- Descriptive statistics
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Treatment of V79 cell cultures with the test material, in the absence and presence of S9 mix, did not increase the proportion of cells with aberrant chromosomes. Thus, the test material was not clastogenic in this in vitro test system.
- Executive summary:
Purpose
The purpose of the in vitro chromosome aberration test is to identify agents that cause structural chromosome aberrations in cultured mammalian cells thus providing information on possible health hazards for the test material and serve as a rational basis for risk assessment to the genotoxic potential of the test item in man.
Study Design
In this study the clastogenic potential of the test material was evaluated by examining its effects on the chromosomes of CHO cells, cultured in vitro and treated in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising system (S-9). The test methodology in this study is in accordance with current literature and complies with the OECD Guideline 473 (1997).
Results
The test material did not induce structural chromosome aberrations when tested at, or very close to, its limit of cytotoxicity following 24 hour treatment in the absence and presence of S9. No treatment-related increase of endoreduplications or polyploid cells was observed. Neither structural nor numerical aberrations were detected.
Conclusion
In conclusion, treatment of V79 cell cultures with the test material, did not increase the proportion of cells with aberrant chromosomes, thus the test material was not clastogenic in this in vitro test system.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 16 JUN 1998 - 11 DEC1998
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- TK gene
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- CELLS USED
- Type and source of cells:
L5178Y TK(+/-) mouse lymphoma cells. The original cultures were obtained from Dr. W. Muster, Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland on March 24, 1995.
For cell lines:
- Absence of Mycoplasma contamination:
yes, regularly checked
- Methods for maintenance in cell culture:
stored as frozen stocks in liquid nitrogen
MEDIA USED
- Type and composition of media, CO2 concentration, humidity level, temperature, if applicable:
Growth media: Three media, supplementing RPMI 1640-medium with Glutamax 1 with different serum concentrations were used
Exposure medium: RPMI- 5 (RPM 1640 with 5% heat inactivated horse serum) 470 mL RPMI 164025 mL horse serum (heat-inactivated horse serum) 5 mL penicillin/streptomycin
Culture medium: RPMI-10 (RPMI 1640 with 10% heat-inactivated horse serum) 445 mL RPMI 164050 mL horse serum (heat-inactivated horse serum) 5 mL penicillin/streptomycin
Survivor- and selection medium: RPMI-20 (RPMI 1640 with 20% heat-inactivated horse serum) 395 mL RPMI 1640100 mL horse serum (heat-inactivated horse serum) 5 mL penicillin/streptomycin - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system: 2% rat liver homogenate (S9 mix) with standard co-factors
- source of S9 : in-house, Institute of Toxicology of MERCK KGaA
- method of preparation of S9 mix : S9 is routinely prepared following the proposals of Ames et al. (1975). Instead of potassium chloride solution, as recommended by Ames, Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline (PBS) which additionally contained 20 mM HEPES pH 7.4 (PBS-HEPES) is used.
- concentration or volume of S9 mix and S9 in the final culture medium: On the day of the experiment, gIucose-6-phosphate (590 mM), NADP (30 mM), KCI (150 mM) and rat liver S9 were mixed at the ratio of 1:1:1:2. For the treatment of the cells with test material, the final concentration of S9 in the cell culture medium was 2 %. For all cultures treated in the presence of S9 mix, a 1 mL aliquot of the mix was added to each cell culture (19 mL) to give a total of 20 mL. Cultures treated in the absence of S9 mix received 1 ml 150 mM KCI.
- quality controls of S9 (e.g., enzymatic activity, sterility, metabolic capability): Every S9 batch is tested for its metabolic activity by the use of specific substrates, requiring different enzymes of the P450-isoenzyme family. The acceptance criterion was perfectly met. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 8.89, 28.1 and 88.9 µg/mL due to range-finding test, selected on the basis of the solubility and cytotoxicity characteristics
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Acetone
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO, acetone
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- without S9
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with S9
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration (single, duplicate, triplicate) : single (duplicate for solvent control), screening version
- Number of independent experiments: 2 series
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 10E7
- Test substance added in medium: On day 1 of the experiment, at least 10E7 cells in a volume of 19 mL of RPMI 5 (to give a final concentration of 5 % serum) were placed in each of a series of sterile disposable 50 mL centrifuge tubes. Solvent, test article or positive control solution (0.2 mL if H2O is the solvent, 0.02 mL of organic solvents) and 1.0 mL of KCl (150 mM) or S9 mix were added.
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 24 hours in the absence and 3 hours in the presence of S9 mix
After having been shaken for 3 hours in the presence and 24 hours in the absence of S9 mix at 37°C, the tubes were centrifuged at 188 x 'g' for 5 minutes, the cells washed with tissue culture medium and resuspended further in 10 ml RPMI 10 per tube. Cell densities were determined using a hemocytometer and the concentrations adjusted to 2 x 10E5/mL. Cells were transferred to flasks for growth through the expression period or were diluted to be plated for survival
FOR GENE MUTATION:
- Expression time (cells in growth medium between treatment and selection): 2 days (until day 3 of the experiment)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selective agent): From observations on recovery and growth of the cultures during the expression period, the cultures were selected to be plated for viability and TFT resistance (mutation assessment). Until scorable (day 7 to day 10).
- Method used: microwell plates for the mouse lymphoma assay.
- If a selective agent is used (e.g., 6-thioguanine or trifluorothymidine), indicate its identity, its concentration and, duration and period of cell exposure.: 5-trifluorothymidine (TFT), final concentration 3 µg/mL
- Number of cells seeded and method to enumerate numbers of viable and mutants cells: 1 x 10E4/mL-> diluted to 8 cells/mL, staining with MTT, identified by eye and counted
METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method, e.g.: relative total growth (RTG). In a preceding range finding test, cell growth was determined after exposure (3 hours in the presence and 24 hours in the absence of S9 mix) to various test material concentrations. The cell number was determined microscopically 24 hours after start of treatment and compared with cell number in the absence of the test material.
- Any supplementary information relevant to cytotoxicity: The test item was non-toxic in the range findeing test. Precipitation of the test item in the cell culture medium was macroscopically visible at the concentrations of 28.1 and 88.9 µg/mL. - Evaluation criteria:
- Test materials are assessed as negative or non-mutagenic in this test system if
• the assay is considered valid and
• no relevant increase in the mutation frequency (at least a 2-fold) occurs.
Test materials are assessed as positive or mutagenic in this test system if
• the assay is considered valid and
• a clear increase in the mutation frequency (at least a 2-fold) occurs dose-dependently (over at least two test material concentrations) or reproducibly at identical concentrations in two independent experimental series performed.
In all other cases, further decisions for testing strategies should be made following the scientific evaluation of all existing data including those of non-toxicological investigations. - Statistics:
- NA
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 88.9 µg/mL (without S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not examined
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation and time of the determination: the test material precipitated in the cell culture medium at concentrations levels between 28.1 and 158 µg/ml.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable):
In a preceding range finding test, cell growth was determined after exposure (3 hours in the presence and 24 hours in the absence of S9 mix) to various test material concentrations. The cell number was determined microscopically 24 hours after start of treatment and compared with cell number in the absence of the test material. The substance was non-toxic in this range finding test. Precipitation in the cell culture medium was macroscopically visible at the concentrations of 28.1 and 88.9 µg/ml.
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data : In the absence and presence of S9 mix, the mutation frequency of the positive controls were clearly elevated.
Gene mutation tests in mammalian cells:
- Results from cytotoxicity measurements: The test material was weakly toxic to the mouse lymphoma cells in the absence of S9 mix at the concentration of 88.9 µg/ml. No toxicity was seen in the presence of S9 mix.
- Conclusions:
- It is concluded that the test material is non-mutagenic in this screening test system under conditions where the positive controls exerted potent mutagenic effects.
- Executive summary:
Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate the mutagenic activity of the test material by examining its ability to induce TK mutations in L5178Y cells in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolizing system (S9 mix).
Study Design
The study was performed acording to OECD Guideline 473. The test material was screened for its ability to induce mutations at the TK locus (5-trifluorothymidine (TFT) resistance) in mouse lymphoma cells using a fluctuation protocol. The study was conducted in the absence and presence of an exogenous metabolizing system (S9 mix from livers of rats pretreated with Aroclor 1254). The exposure time was 24 hours in the absence and 3 hours in the presence of S9 mix.
Results
The top doses to determine TFT resistance in this experiment were selected on the basis of the solubility and cytotoxicity characteristics of the test material. The test material was weakly toxic to the mouse lymphoma cells in the absence of S9 mix at the concentration of 88.9 µg/ml. Under the different experimental conditions of this study, the test material precipitated in the cell culture medium at concentration levels between 28.1 and 158 µg/ml. Concentrations ranging from 8.89 to 158 µg/ml were therefore tested.
Negative (solvent) and positive control treatments were included in each mutation experiment in the absence and presence of S9 mix. Mutant frequencies in negative control cultures fell within normal ranges, and clear increases in mutation were induced by the positive control chemicals 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide (without S9 mix) and benzo[a]pyrene (with S9 mix). Therefore the study was accepted as valid.
No relevant increases in mutant frequency were observed following treatment with the test material in neither the absence or presence of S9 mix.
Conclusion
It is therefore concluded that the test material is non-mutagenic in this screening test system under conditions where the positive controls exerted potent mutagenic effects.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
in vitro
Gene mutation in bacteria, OECD 471
The registered substance was tested for gene mutation according to OECD Guideline 471 following GLP.
Purpose
The purpose of this assay was to provide information on possible health hazards for the test material and serve as a rational basis for risk assessment to the genotoxic potential of the test item in man.
Study Design
The investigations for the mutagenic potential of the test material were performed using Salmonella typhimuriumt ester strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537, and Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA. The plate incorporation test with and without addition of liver S9 mix from Aroclor 1254-pretreated rats was used. Two independent experimental series were performed.
Results
The test material was dissolved in acetone and tested at concentrations ranging from 5 to 5000 µg/plate. Precipitation of the test material on the agar plates occurred at concentrations 500 µg/plate. Toxicity to the bacteria was not observed.
Daunomycin, N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, 9-aminoacridine and cumene hydroperoxide served as strain specific positive control test materials in the absence of S9 mix. 2-Aminoanthracene and benzo[a]pyrene were used for testing the bacteria and the activity of the S9 mix. Each treatment with the test materials used as positive controls led to a clear increase in revertant colonies, thus, showing the expected reversion properties of all strains and good metabolic activity of the S9 mix used.
In both series of experiments, each performed with and without the addition of rat liver S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test material showed no increase in the number of revertants of any bacterial strain. According to the criteria for negative and positive results predetermined in the Study Protocol, the test material was not mutagenic under the described experimental conditions.
Conclusion
With and without addition of S9 mix as the external metabolizing system, the test material was not mutagenic under the experimental conditions described.
Chromosome aberration, OECD 473
Purpose
The purpose of the in vitro chromosome aberration test is to identify agents that cause structural chromosome aberrations in cultured mammalian cells thus providing information on possible health hazards for the test material and serve as a rational basis for risk assessment to the genotoxic potential of the test item in man.
Study Design
In this study the clastogenic potential of the test material was evaluated by examining its effects on the chromosomes of CHO cells, cultured in vitro and treated in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolising system (S-9). The test methodology in this study is in accordance with current literature and complies with the OECD Guideline 473 (1997).
Results
The test material did not induce structural chromosome aberrations when tested at, or very close to, its limit of cytotoxicity following 24 hour treatment in the absence and presence of S9. No treatment-related increase of endoreduplications or polyploid cells was observed. Neither structural nor numerical aberrations were detected.
Conclusion
In conclusion, treatment of V79 cell cultures with the test material, did not increase the proportion of cells with aberrant chromosomes, thus the test material was not clastogenic in this in vitro test system.
Mammalian gene mutation, OECD 476
The registered substance was tested for gene mutation according to OECD Guideline 476.
Purpose
The objective of this study was to evaluate the mutagenic activity of the test material by examining its ability to induce TK mutations in L5178Y cells in the absence and presence of a rat liver metabolizing system (S9 mix).
Study Design
The test material was screened for its ability to induce mutations at the TK locus (5-trifluorothymidine (TFT) resistance) in mouse lymphoma cells using a fluctuation protocol. The study was conducted in the absence and presence of an exogenous metabolizing system (S9 mix from livers of rats pretreated with Aroclor 1254). The exposure time was 24 hours in the absence and 3 hours in the presence of S9 mix.
Results
The top doses to determine TFT resistance in this experiment were selected on the basis of the solubility and cytotoxicity characteristics of the test material. The test material was weakly toxic to the mouse lymphoma cells in the absence of S9 mix at the concentration of 88.9 µg/ml. Under the different experimental conditions of this study, the test material precipitated in the cell culture medium at concentration levels between 28.1 and 158 µg/ml. Concentrations ranging from 8.89 to 158 µg/ml were therefore tested.
Negative (solvent) and positive control treatments were included in each mutation experiment in the absence and presence of S9 mix. Mutant frequencies in negative control cultures fell within normal ranges, and clear increases in mutation were induced by the positive control chemicals 4-nitroquinoline N-oxide (without S9 mix) and benzo[a]pyrene (with S9 mix). Therefore the study was accepted as valid.
No relevant increases in mutant frequency were observed following treatment with the test material in neither the absence or presence of S9 mix.
Conclusion
It is therefore concluded that the test material is non-mutagenic in this screening test system under conditions where the positive controls exerted potent mutagenic effects.
Overall conclusion
The test material was not mutagenic in assays in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1535, TA1537, TA1538, TA98 and TA100 and in E. coli wp2 in the presence or absence of exogenous metabolic activation system.
Treatment of V79 cell cultures with the test material, did not increase the proportion of cells with aberrant chromosomes, thus the test material was not clastogenic.
The test material was also non-mutagenic in mouse lymphoma cells with and without metabolic activation.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The key studies indicate no genotoxic potential present in vitro, thus no classification for mutagenicity is triggered in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.