Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 429-780-4 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The basis for this read-across is the “Read-Across Assessment Framework” (RAAF) (ECHA 2017). The analogue approach is applied. The read-across hypothesis is that the target and the source substances have similar (eco)toxicological and fate properties as a result of structural similarity. According to the RAAF this approach is covered by scenario 2: “Different compounds have the same type of effect(s)”.
“This scenario covers the analogue approach for which the read-across hypothesis is based on different compounds with qualitatively similar properties. For the REACH information requirement under consideration, the property investigated in a study conducted with one source substance is used to predict properties that would be observed in a study with the target substance if it were to be conducted. Qualitatively similar properties or absence of effect are predicted. The predicted property may be similar or based on a worst-case approach” (ECHA 2017) (for details see read-across statement in section 13).
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
The target and the source substances are waxy solids. Their physical and chemical properties are in the same range. The target and the source substances are of highest purity. Thus, there are no impurities to consider in this read-across approach (for details see read-across statement in section 13).
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
No indication for a different ecotoxicological mode of action of the source and the target substance is given. This is justified based on structural similarity and similar physical-chemical properties. This is also supported by a profiling performed with the OECD QSAR Toolbox v4.3. As neutral organics the substances are both classified as Basesurface narcotics by the profiler Acute aquatic toxicity MOA by OASIS. Basesurface narcotics are defined as “inert chemicals that are not reactive and do not interact with specific receptors in the organisms” (explanation of profiler Acute aquatic toxicity MOA by OASIS in the OECD QSAR Toolbox v4.3).
Regarding short-term toxicity to invertebrates, a study according to OECD Guideline 202 and GLP is available for the source substance. No adverse effects were observed at the saturated concentration. Therefore, the study was conducted as a limit test at a nominal concentration of 100 mg/L. No toxic effect was observed. Therefore, the EC50 based on mobility was above 100 mg/L.
Additionally, the source substance was tested in a growth inhibition study in algae according to OECD Guideline 201 and GLP. No adverse effects were observed at the saturated concentration. Therefore, the study was conducted as a limit test at a nominal concentration of 100 mg/L. No toxic effect was observed. Therefore, the EC50 based on growth rate was above 100 mg/L.
Based on the given justification the target substance is considered to be also not toxic to aquatic invertebrates and algae at saturated concentration (EC50 > 100 mg/L).
4. DATA MATRIX
for details see read-across statement in section 13 - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- >= 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat. (dissolved fraction)
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: yes, the mean growth rates found in the treatments after 24, 48 and 72 h were higher than the mean growth rates in the vehicle control. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- An aqueous preparation of 100 mg/L (nominal) of the test material revealed no toxic effect in the test system. Analytically, the 72 hours EC50 to Desmodesmus subspicatus could not be determined; it exceeded the maximum solubility of the test material in reconstituted water. The read-across analogue approach is based on similarity in chemical structure, physical-chemical properties, toxicokinetic behaviour and toxicological study results. As a conclusion, it is scientifically justified to fill (eco)toxicological data gaps for the target substance with data on the respective source substance. Therefore, the same result can be applied to the target substance.
- Executive summary:
The source substance was tested for toxicity to algae in an acute growth inhibition test according to OECD Guideline 201 following GLP.
Purpose
The purpose of this assay was to identify the aquatic toxicity potential the test material in algea to provide a rational basis for hazard estimation for the test item in aquatic environments.
Study design
The influence of the test material on the growth and growth rate of the green algae species Desmodesmus subspicatus was tested. The study design included one control and one test material group with six replicates, each containing about 100 mL reconstituted water or test medium and 10,000 cells/mL at the start of the experimental phase. The algae were exposed to a filtrate of nominal 100 mg/L and the study was performed as a limit test in an open static test system. The growth was calculated after 24, 48, and 72 hours exposure in the test medium.
Results
The calculation of the water solubility yielded a low value of 0.0004 mg/L. Due to this low water solubility estimate, the the test material concentration in the reconstituted water could not be determined. For the test material, the following EC50 values and no effect concentration for Desmodesmus subspicatus were obtained:
Parameter (0-72h) Growth rate Yield EC10 (mg/L)
95% confidence interval>0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L)
n.d.>0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L)
n.d.EC20 (mg/L)
95% confidence interval> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L)
n.d.> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L)
n.d.EC50 (mg/L)
95% confidence interval> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L)
n.d.> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L)
n.d.NOEC (mg/L) ≥ 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) ≥ 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) LOEC (mg/L) >0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) >0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. could not be determined
Conclusions
An aqueous preparation of 100 mg/L (nominal) of the test material revealed no toxic effect in the test system. The 72 hours EC50 exceeded the maximum solubility of the test material in reconstituted water (EC50 > 0.00004 mg/L).
The read-across analogue approach is based on similarity in chemical structure, physical-chemical properties, toxicokinetic behaviour and toxicological study results. As a conclusion, it is scientifically justified to fill (eco)toxicological data gaps for the target substance with data on the respective source substance. Therefore, the same result can be applied to the target substance.
Reference
Description of key information
Read-across, key, growth rate inhibition, D. subspicatus, limit test, OECD 201, GLP: EC50 > 100 mg/L (nominal), EC10 > 100 mg/L (nominal) after 72 h.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The source substance was tested for toxicity to algae in an acute growth inhibition test according to OECD Guideline 201 following GLP.
Purpose
The purpose of this assay was to identify the aquatic toxicity potential the test material in algea to provide a rational basis for hazard estimation for the test item in aquatic environments.
Study design
The influence of the test material on the growth and growth rate of the green algae species Desmodesmus subspicatus was tested. The study design included one control and one test material group with six replicates, each containing about 100 mL reconstituted water or test medium and 10,000 cells/mL at the start of the experimental phase. The algae were exposed to a filtrate of nominal 100 mg/L and the study was performed as a limit test in an open static test system. The growth was calculated after 24, 48, and 72 hours exposure in the test medium.
Results
The calculation of the water solubility yielded a low value of 0.0004 mg/L. Due to this low water solubility estimate, the the test material concentration in the reconstituted water could not be determined. For the test material, the following EC50 values and no effect concentration for Desmodesmus subspicatus were obtained:
Parameter (0-72h) | Growth rate | Yield |
EC10 (mg/L) 95% confidence interval |
> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. |
> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. |
EC20 (mg/L) 95% confidence interval |
> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. |
> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. |
EC50 (mg/L) 95% confidence interval |
> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. |
> 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) n.d. |
NOEC (mg/L) | ≥ 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) | ≥ 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) |
LOEC (mg/L) | > 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) | > 0.00004 mg/L (nominal >100 mg/L) |
n.d. could not be determined
Conclusions
An aqueous preparation of 100 mg/L (nominal) of the test material revealed no toxic effect in the test system. The 72 hours EC50 exceeded the maximum solubility of the test material in reconstituted water (EC50 > 0.00004 mg/L).
The read-across analogue approach is based on similarity in chemical structure, physical-chemical properties, toxicokinetic behaviour and toxicological study results. As a conclusion, it is scientifically justified to fill (eco)toxicological data gaps for the target substance with data on the respective source substance. Therefore the same result can be applied to the target substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.