Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 948-065-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Flash point
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- flash point of flammable liquids
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 20-02-2018 to 26-07-2018
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.9 (Flash-Point)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ISO 2719 (Determination of flash point - Pensky-Martens closed cup method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: UN Transport of Dangerous Goods: Manual of Tests and Criteria: ST/SG/AC.10/11/Rev.6 Paragraph 32.4.1: Non-Viscous Flammable Liquids (2015)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- ASTM D93 (Standard test methods for flash point by pensky-martens closed cup tester)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ASTM D7094: "Standard Test Method for Flash Point by Modified Continuously Closed Cup (MCCCFP) Tester", 2012.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of method:
- equilibrium method closed cup
- Flash point apparatus:
- other: Eraflash flash-point tester
- Flash point:
- 124 °C
- Atm. press.:
- 101.325 kPa
- Remarks on result:
- other: Duplicate determination; completed at atmospheric pressure
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- The flash point of the test item was determined to be 124 °C at 101.325 kPa.
- Executive summary:
The flash point was determined according to EU Method A.9 using an Eraflash flash-point tester in the closed cup method consistent with ISO 2719, ASTM D93 and ASTM D7094: Modified Continuously Closed Cup Flash Point (MCCCFP) test under GLP. The Eraflash tester employs a small volume of test item which reduces the risk of fires or other uncontrolled reactions of substances with an unknown flash point. The test cup was filled with approximately 2 ml test item and placed in the holder of the flash-point tester. The sample was stirred during heating. The ignition of the sample vapour was performed by an electric arc and ignition was automatically detected by the flash point tester. The flash-point is automatically corrected for atmospheric pressure by the flash point tester. Following a preliminary test starting at 25°C, an attempt was made to ignite the vapour of the test item for every 2°C temperature rise. The test cup was heated at a rate of 5 ± 0.5°C/minute. No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred (i.e. 105°C). Therefore, the preliminary test was repeated. Starting at 25°C the ignition source was applied for every 2°C temperature rise. The estimated flashpoint was 123.5 °C. The definitive test was conducted in duplicate. Starting at 100°C, respectively. Ignition was tested for every 2°C temperature rise. Test 1 indicated a flash point of 124.5°C. Test 2 indicated a flash point of 126.5°C. Under the conditions of the study, the flash-point of the test item is 124°C at 101.325 kPa.
Applicant assessment indicates: comparison to ISO 2719: 2016 and ASTM D3278: 2011 indicates that for viscous liquids that the test can expect a repeatabily of ± 5°C. Within ASTM D7094: 2017a, repeatability of ± 4.1°C is indicated. Lower repeatabilities of ± 2.3°C have been reported for Eraflash method. The duplicate test results are within the above repeatability ranges.
Reference
Preliminary Test:
Starting at 25°C, an attempt was made to ignite the vapour of the test item for every 2°C temperature rise. The test cup was heated at a rate of 5 ± 0.5°C/minute. No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred (i.e. 105°C). Therefore the preliminary test was repeated. Starting at 25°C the ignition source was applied for every 2°C temperature rise. The estimated flashpoint was 123.5 °C.
Main Study
Two tests were performed. The test cup was heated at a rate of 5 ± 0.5°C/minute. Starting at 100°C, ignition was tested for every 2°C temperature rise. Determination 1: 124.5 °C and Determination 2: 126.5 °C: Lowest flash point = 124 °C.
Description of key information
FP: 124 °C at 101.325 kPa atmospheric pressure, EU Method A.9, 2018
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Flash point at 101 325 Pa:
- 124 °C
Additional information
Key study : EU Method A.9, 2018 : The flash point was determined according to EU Method A.9 using an Eraflash flash-point tester in the closed cup method consistent with ISO 2719, ASTM D93 and ASTM D7094: Modified Continuously Closed Cup Flash Point (MCCCFP) test under GLP. The Eraflash tester employs a small volume of test item which reduces the risk of fires or other uncontrolled reactions of substances with an unknown flash point. The test cup was filled with approximately 2 ml test item and placed in the holder of the flash-point tester. The sample was stirred during heating. The ignition of the sample vapour was performed by an electric arc and ignition was automatically detected by the flash point tester. The flash-point is automatically corrected for atmospheric pressure by the flash point tester. Following a preliminary test starting at 25°C, an attempt was made to ignite the vapour of the test item for every 2°C temperature rise. The test cup was heated at a rate of 5 ± 0.5°C/minute. No flash-point was observed below the temperature at which reaction and/or degradation of the test item occurred (i.e. 105°C). Therefore, the preliminary test was repeated. Starting at 25°C the ignition source was applied for every 2°C temperature rise. The estimated flashpoint was 123.5 °C. The definitive test was conducted in duplicate. Starting at 100°C, respectively. Ignition was tested for every 2°C temperature rise. Test 1 indicated a flash point of 124.5°C. Test 2 indicated a flash point of 126.5°C. Under the conditions of the study, the flash-point of the test item is 124°C at 101.325 kPa.
Applicant assessment indicates: comparison to ISO 2719: 2016 and ASTM D3278: 2011 indicates that for viscous liquids that the test can expect a repeatability of ± 5°C. Within ASTM D7094: 2017a, repeatability of± 4.1°C is indicated. Lower repeatability with viscous test items± 2.3°C have been reported for Eraflash method. The duplicate test results are within the above repeatability ranges.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.