Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
29 September 2016 to 26 May 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: OECD Guideline 471, updated and adopted 21 July 1997; ISO/IEC 17025:2005

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes
Remarks:
Refer to main study report
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-​Propanol, 1-​[[[3-​(aminomethyl)​phenyl]​methyl]​amino]​-​3-​(2-​methylphenoxy)​-
Cas Number:
1617528-47-8
Molecular formula:
C18H24N2O2
IUPAC Name:
2-​Propanol, 1-​[[[3-​(aminomethyl)​phenyl]​methyl]​amino]​-​3-​(2-​methylphenoxy)​-
Constituent 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,3'-[benzene-1,3-diylbis(methanediylimino)]bis[1-(2-methylphenoxy)propan-2-ol]
Molecular formula:
C28H36N2O4
IUPAC Name:
3,3'-[benzene-1,3-diylbis(methanediylimino)]bis[1-(2-methylphenoxy)propan-2-ol]
Constituent 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
m-phenylenebis(methylamine)
EC Number:
216-032-5
EC Name:
m-phenylenebis(methylamine)
Cas Number:
1477-55-0
Molecular formula:
C8H12N2
IUPAC Name:
1,3-phenylenedimethanamine
impurity 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-Propanol, 1,3-bis(2-methylphenoxy)-
Cas Number:
17181-49-6
Molecular formula:
C17H20O3
IUPAC Name:
2-Propanol, 1,3-bis(2-methylphenoxy)-
impurity 2
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1-{[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methylphenoxy)propyl][3-({[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methylphenoxy)propyl]amino}methyl)benzyl]amino}-3-(2-methylphenoxy)propan-1-ol
Molecular formula:
C38H48N2O6
IUPAC Name:
1-{[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methylphenoxy)propyl][3-({[2-hydroxy-3-(2-methylphenoxy)propyl]amino}methyl)benzyl]amino}-3-(2-methylphenoxy)propan-1-ol
impurity 3
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3,3',3'',3'''-[benzene-1,3-diylbis(methanediylnitrilo)]tetrakis[1-(2-methylphenoxy)propan-2-ol]
Molecular formula:
C48H60N2O8
IUPAC Name:
3,3',3'',3'''-[benzene-1,3-diylbis(methanediylnitrilo)]tetrakis[1-(2-methylphenoxy)propan-2-ol]
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Details on test material:
Identification:
1,3-Benzenedimethanamine, reaction products with glycidyl tolyl ether
Appearance/Physical state:
clear, colorless, viscous liquid
Batch:
WA 1508
Purity:
100% UVCB
Expiry date:
01 January 2021
Storage conditions:
room temperature, in the dark
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: WA1508 (provided by Sponsor)STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, protected from light- Solubility of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: DMSO was the vehicle of choice based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells. The test substance formed a clear solution in DMSO at a concentration of approximately 500 mg/mL in the solubility test conducted at BioReliance.TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: To achieve a solution, the most concentrated dilution was vortexed for two minutes in the mutagenicity assay.

Method

Target gene:
The Salmonella strains contain mutations in the histidine operon, thereby imposing a requirement for histidine in the growth medium. These strains contain the deep rough (rfa) mutation, which deletes the polysaccharide side chain from the lipopolysaccharides of the bacterial cell surface. This increases cell permeability of larger substances. The other mutation is a deletion of the uvrB gene, which codes for a protein of the DNA nucleotide excision repair system, resulting in an increased sensitivity in detecting many mutagens. This deletion also includes the nitrate reductase (chi) and biotin (bio) genes (bacteria require biotin for growth). Tester strains TA98 and TA100 contain the R-factor plasmid, pKM101. These strains are reverted by a number of mutagens that are detected weakly or not at all with the non-R-factor parent strains. pKM101 increases chemical and spontaneous mutagenesis by enhancing an error-prone DNA repair system, which is normally present in these organisms. The tester strain Escherichia coli WP2 uvrA carries the defect in one of the genes for tryptophan biosynthesis. Tryptophan-independent mutants (revertants) can arise either by a base change at the site of the original alteration or by a base change elsewhere in the chromosome so that the original defect is suppressed. This second possibility can occur in several different ways so that the system seems capable of detecting all types of mutagens, which substitute one base for another. Additionally, the strain is deficient in the DNA nucleotide excision repair system.
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Aroclor 1254-induced rat liver S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
In the preliminary toxicity assay, the dose levels tested were 6.67, 10.0, 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333 and 5000 µg per plate.In the mutagenicity assay, the dose levels tested were 1.50, 5.00, 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg per plate.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO for the test substance; all positive controls were diluted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) except for sodium azide, which was diluted in sterile water- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle:DMSO was the vehicle of choice based on the solubility of the test substance and compatibility with the target cells
Controls
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
methylmethanesulfonate
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)DURATION- Exposure duration: 48 to 72 hoursNUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 1 in the preliminary toxicity assay; 3 in the mutagenicity assayNUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: >/= 0.3 x 10^8 cells/plateDETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY- A dose level is considered toxic if one or both of the following criteria are met: (1) A >50 % reduction inthe mean number of revertants per plate as compared to the mean vehicle control value. This reductionmust be accompanied by an abrupt dose dependent drop in the revertant count. (2) At least a moderatereduction in the background lawn (background code 3, 4 or 5).
Evaluation criteria:
The revertant colony numbers were determined for each plate (counted either manually or by automatic colony counter). The mean and standard deviation of the number of revertants per plate were calculated and reported.For the test substance to be evaluated positive, it must cause a dose-related increase in the mean revertants per plate of at least one tester strain over a minimum of two increasing concentrations of test substance as specified below:Strains TA1535 and TA1537Data sets were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response was equal to or greater than 3.0-times the mean vehicle control value and above the corresponding acceptable vehicle control range.Strains TA98, TA100 and WP2 uvrAData sets were judged positive if the increase in mean revertants at the peak of the dose response was equal to or greater than 2.0-times the mean vehicle control value and above the corresponding acceptable vehicle control range.An equivocal response is a biologically relevant increase in a revertant count that partially meets the criteria for evaluation as positive. This could be a dose-responsive increase that does not achieve the respective threshold cited above or a non-dose responsive increase that is equal to or greater than the respective threshold cited. A response was evaluated as negative if it was neither positive nor equivocal.
Statistics:
According to the test guidelines, the biological relevance of the results is the criterion for the interpretation of the results, and a statistical evaluation of the results is not regarded as necessary.

Results and discussion

Test results
Key result
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
In the preliminary toxicity assay, toxicity was observed beginning at concentrations from 66.7 to 3333 ug per plate. In the mutagenicity assay, toxicity was observed beginning at 150, 500 or 1500 ug per plate.
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS- Precipitation: No precipitate was observed.HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)See main study report appendix
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol. The results of the Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay indicate that, under the conditions of this study, 1,3-Benzenedimethanamine, reaction products with glycidyl tolyl ether did not cause a positive mutagenic response with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of Aroclor induced rat liver S9. The study was concluded to be negative without conducting a confirmatory (independent repeat) assay because the results were clearly negative; hence, no further testing was warranted.
Executive summary:

All criteria for a valid study were met as described in the protocol.

The test substance, 1,3-Benzenedimethanamine, reaction products with glycidyl tolyl ether, was tested to evaluate its mutagenic potential by measuring its ability to induce reverse mutations at selected loci of several strains of Salmonella typhimurium and at the tryptophan locus of Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was used as the vehicle.

In the preliminary toxicity assay, the dose levels tested were 6.67, 10.0, 33.3, 66.7, 100, 333, 667, 1000, 3333 and 5000 µg per plate. No precipitate was observed. Toxicity was observed beginning at concentrations from 66.7 to 3333 μg per plate. Based upon these results, the maximum dose tested in the mutagenicity assay was 5000 µg per plate.

In the mutagenicity assay, the dose levels tested were 1.50, 5.00, 15.0, 50.0, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg per plate. No precipitate was observed. Toxicity was observed beginning at 150, 500 or 1500 μg per plate. No positive mutagenic responses were observed with any of the tester strains in either the presence or absence of S9 activation.

These results indicate 1,3-Benzenedimethanamine, reaction products with glycidyl tolyl ether was negative for the ability to induce reverse mutations at selected loci of several strains ofSalmonellatyphimurium and at the tryptophan locus ofEscherichia colistrain WP2 uvrA in the presence and absence of an exogenous metabolic activation system.