Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 286-249-8 | CAS number: 85203-56-1 Extractives and their physically modified derivatives such as tinctures, concretes, absolutes, essential oils, oleoresins, terpenes, terpene-free fractions, distillates, residues, etc., obtained from Eucalyptus maculata citriodora, Myrtaceae.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Gene mutation in bacteria (OECD 471)
The genotoxicity of the test substance Eucalyptus citriodora was tested in bacteria according to OECD guideline 471 (Ames test) two experiment (plate incorporation and pre-incubation). Cytotoxicity was observed in both experiments by a reduction in growth of the bacterial background lawns, being more apparent in the experiment using plate incorporation methodology. No significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test item, either with or without metabolic activation or exposure method. The test item was considered to be non-mutagenic to bacteria.
In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test (OECD 473)
Genotoxicity of the test substance Eucalyptus citrodora was determined in an in vitro chromosome aberration test according to OECD guideline 473. Cytotoxicity was observed in all three exposure groups at higher doses (inhibition up to 68%). No significant changes in frequency of cells with aberrations and the number of polyploid cells was observed. The test substance did not induce any toxicologically significant increase in frequency of cells with chromosome aberrations with or without metabolic activation. It was therefore considered to be non-clastogenic to human lymphocytes in vitro.
In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test (OECD 476)
The genotoxicity of Eucalyptus citriodora was tested in mouse L5178Y lymphoma cells according to OECD guideline 476. Two experiments were performed, one with and without presence of S9 for 4 hours and one for 24 hours without presence of S9. Evidence of marked dose-related (cyto)toxicity following exposure to the test item was found in both experiments (with or without S9). In the 4-hours exposure experiment no effect on viability was found, although modest reduction in viability was found in the 24-hours exposure experiment (indicating residual toxicity). The test article did not induce statistically significant (dose related) increase in the mutant frequency at the TK +/- locus in L5178Y cells in the 4 -hour exposure experiment (with S9) and the 24-hours exposure experiment (without S9). The test item was therefore considered to be non-mutagenic to mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
No selection is made as a Weight of Evidence approach was followed which is described below.
Short description of key information:
- Gene mutation in bacteria: not mutagenic (OECD 471)
- In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test: not clastogenic (OECD 473)
- In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation test: negative (OECD 476)
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
Eucalyptus Citriodora did not show any genotoxic potential in three genotoxicity tests. Therefore, it can be concluded that the substance is not genotoxic and does not need to be classified for genotoxicity in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of 1272/2008/EC (CLP/EU-GHS).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.