Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 941-593-4 | CAS number: 1623405-26-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.97 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 49.4 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Two studies, a combined 28-day/reproduction screening by gavage and a combined 90-day/2-generation study by dietary admixture, resulted to LOAELs of 100 mg/kg bw/d resp. 1000 ppm (72 to 90 mg/kg bw/day) in F0 and F1, based on minimal to slight necrotizing granulomas in mesenteric lymph nodes observed in some animals at the lowest dose groups in these studies. Extrapolation indicates a NOEL of around 20 mg/kg bw/day (conservative; Extrapolation of the three dose-response curves results to 28 - 52 mg/kg bw as NOEL; 20 mg/kg bw/d corresponds to a factor between 3.6 to 5 from the LOAELs to NOEL), as threshold for the effects irrespective duration of the study (45 day in OECD 422 or 90 to 126-days in 2 generation study), but with increasing duration the severity of effects at higher dose levels tend to increase.
The corrected 8 hr inhalation NOEC systemic toxicity for workers is NOEL(20 mg/kg) * 1.76 mg/m3 * 7/5 (correction 5 working days/wk) = 49.4 mg/m3.
No factor 2 route extrapolation from oral to inhalation is applied: di-C16-C18 (evennumbered) alkyl tripropylenetetramine is a viscous fluid with a high boiling point (> 400 °C) and very low vapour pressure (1.3 x 10-6 Pa at 20°C). Exposure by inhalation would only be possible in the form of aerosol, consisting of larger droplets depositing in upper airways. Aerosols will deposit mainly on upper airways, and will be subsequently swallowed following mucociliary transportation to pharynx. This result to no principal difference in absorption compared to oral route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects at LOAEL are not severe. The performed extrapolation to a NOEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day from the various dose-response curves is comparable to a factor of 3.6 to 5 being applied to the LOAELs.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for sub-chronic to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Already included in NOAEC calculation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data is from studies with high reliability
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Independent studies lead to comparable results.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- hazard unknown (no further information necessary)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- irritation (respiratory tract)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.28 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 28 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Two studies, a combined 28-day/reproduction screening by gavage and a combined 90-day/2-generation study by dietary admixture, resulted to LOAELs of 100 mg/kg bw/d resp. 1000 ppm (72 to 90 mg/kg bw/day) in F0 and F1, based on minimal to slight necrotizing granulomas in mesenteric lymph nodes observed in some animals at the lowest dose groups in these studies. Extrapolation indicates a NOEL of around 20 mg/kg bw/day (conservative; Extrapolation of the three dose-response curves results to 28 - 52 mg/kg bw as NOEL; 20 mg/kg bw/d corresponds to a factor between 3.6 to 5 from the LOAELs to NOEL), as threshold for the effects irrespective duration of the study (45 day in OECD 422 or 90 to 126-days in 2 generation study), but with increasing duration the severity of effects at higher dose levels tend to increase.
The corrected 8 hr dermal NOEL systemic toxicity for workers is NOEL(20 mg/kg) * 7/5 (correction 5 working days/wk) = 28 mg/kg bw/day.
At this stage no data are available on dermal absorption. It is not expected to easily pass the skin in view of its ionised (4+) form under physiological conditions. Based on the severe irritant properties, increased dermal absorption as a consequence of facilitated penetration through damaged skin can be anticipated. Although dermal absorption is not expected at any considerable rate, as conservative approach the absorption via dermal route is considered to be similar to the absorption rate via oral route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects at LOAEL are not severe. The performed extrapolation to a NOEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day from the various dose-response curves is comparable to a factor of 3.6 to 5 being applied to the LOAELs.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for sub-chronic to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor for allometric scaling from rat to human.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data is from studies with high reliability
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Independent studies lead to comparable results
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- skin irritation/corrosion
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.3 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 14.81 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Two studies, a combined 28-day/reproduction screening by gavage and a combined 90-day/2-generation study by dietary admixture, resulted to LOAELs of 100 mg/kg bw/d resp. 1000 ppm (72 to 90 mg/kg bw/day) in F0 and F1, based on minimal to slight necrotizing granulomas in mesenteric lymph nodes observed in some animals at the lowest dose groups in these studies. Extrapolation indicates a NOEL of around 20 mg/kg bw/day (conservative; Extrapolation of the three dose-response curves results to 28 - 52 mg/kg bw as NOEL; 20 mg/kg bw/d corresponds to a factor between 3.6 to 5 from the LOAELs to NOEL), as threshold for the effects irrespective duration of the study (45 day in OECD 422 or 90 to 126-days in 2 generation study), but with increasing duration the severity of effects at higher dose levels tend to increase.
The corrected 24 hr inhalation NOEC systemic toxicity for general population is NOAEL (20) * 1/1.35 mg/m3 = 14.81 mg/m3.
No factor 2 route extrapolation from oral to inhalation is applied: di-C16-C18 (evennumbered) alkyl tripropylenetetramine is a viscous fluid with a high boiling point (> 400 °C) and very low vapour pressure 1.3 x 10-6 Pa at 20°C). Due to the low vp no significant contribution to exposures can be expected via vapour. Exposure by inhalation would only be possible in the form of aerosol, consisting of larger droplets depositing in upper airways. Aerosols will deposit mainly on upper airways, and will be subsequently swallowed following mucociliary transportation to pharynx. This result to no principal difference in absorption compared to oral route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects at LOAEL are not severe. The performed extrapolation to a NOEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day from the various dose-response curves is comparable to a factor of 3.6 to 5 being applied to the LOAELs.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for sub-chronic to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Already included in NOAEC calculation
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data is from studies with high reliability
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Two studies, a combined 28-day/reproduction screening by gavage and a combined 90-day/2-generation study by dietary admixture, resulted to LOAELs of 100 mg/kg bw/d resp. 1000 ppm (72 to 90 mg/kg bw/day) in F0 and F1, based on minimal to slight necrotizing granulomas in mesenteric lymph nodes observed in some animals at the lowest dose groups in these studies. Extrapolation indicates a NOEL of around 20 mg/kg bw/day (conservative; Extrapolation of the three dose-response curves results to 28 - 52 mg/kg bw as NOEL; 20 mg/kg bw/d corresponds to a factor between 3.6 to 5 from the LOAELs to NOEL), as threshold for the effects irrespective duration of the study (45 day in OECD 422 or 90 to 126-days in 2 generation study), but with increasing duration the severity of effects at higher dose levels tend to increase.
The corrected 24 hr dermal NOEL systemic toxicity for workers is NOEL(20 mg/kg) = 20 mg/kg bw/day.
At this stage no data are available on dermal absorption. It is not expected to easily pass the skin in view of its ionised (4+) form under physiological conditions. Based on the severe irritant properties, increased dermal absorption as a consequence of facilitated penetration through damaged skin can be anticipated. Although dermal absorption is not expected at any considerable rate, as conservative approach the absorption via dermal route is considered to be similar to the absorption rate via oral route.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects at LOAEL are not severe. The performed extrapolation to a NOEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day from the various dose-response curves is comparable to a factor of 3.6 to 5 being applied to the LOAELs
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for sub-chronic to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor for allometric scaling from rat to human.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data is from studies with high reliability.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Independent studies lead to comparable results.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 20 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Two studies, a combined 28-day/reproduction screening by gavage and a combined 90-day/2-generation study by dietary admixture, resulted to LOAELs of 100 mg/kg bw/d resp. 1000 ppm (72 to 90 mg/kg bw/day) in F0 and F1, based on minimal to slight necrotizing granulomas in mesenteric lymph nodes observed in some animals at the lowest dose groups in these studies. Extrapolation indicates a NOEL of around 20 mg/kg bw/day (conservative; Extrapolation of the three dose-response curves results to 28 - 52 mg/kg bw as NOEL; 20 mg/kg bw/d corresponds to a factor between 3.6 to 5 from the LOAELs to NOEL), as threshold for the effects irrespective duration of the study (45 day in OECD 422 or 90 to 126-days in 2 generation study), but with increasing duration the severity of effects at higher dose levels tend to increase.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Effects at LOAEL are not severe. The performed extrapolation to a NOEL of 20 mg/kg bw/day from the various dose-response curves is comparable to a factor of 3.6 to 5 being applied to the LOAELs.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- Default assessment factor for sub-chronic to chronic.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor for allometric scaling from rat to human.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Available data is from studies with high reliability.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- Independent studies lead to comparable results.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Di-C16-C18 (evennumbered) alkyl tripropylenetetramine is not used in the consumer sector. Systemic long term DNELs for general public are provided to allow for possible assessment of indirect exposure.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.