Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 920-762-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Biodegradation in soil
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
Description of key information
The recovery of the three UVCB main components directly after application ranged depending on compound and soil between 78.2% and 109.5% and therefore the extraction method was suitable.
Based on the kinetic calculations the following DT50 time ranges were found depending on test soil:
ADSA: 349 – 839 days
AMSA: 56 – 1424 days
HIBA: 5 – 49 days
The main components showed different patterns of concentration decrease. The soil type affected also this decrease. In all soils tested, the two sulfonic components (ADSA and AMSA) disappeared slowly. The concentration decrease of carbonic acid HIBA was clearly faster. A clear correlation between soil parameters and disappearance of the main components was not found.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The test substance is an UVCB substance containing five identified organic substances (see IUCLID section 1.2). The organic part represents about 40% (wet weight) of all the test substance. Due to this diversity of components, it was thus not possible to synthesize a radiolabeled sample which was representative of all the test substance. According to paragraph 6 of OECD Test guideline No. 307, as it was not possible to prepare such radiolabeled sample, the experiment focused on transformation rates, not on transformation pathways. As indicated in the letter sent to ECHA (communication number TPE-D-0000002417-75-05/F) in October the 16th 2013, after discussion with study directors, it had been concluded that the protocol described in OECD Test guideline No. 307 had to be adapted to this specific test substance by focusing on the following major organic components:
- diammonium 2-oxopropane-1,3-disulphonate ((CAS N°25372 -95 -6); 14.5 -18% wet weight; ADSA);
- isobutyrate mixture (10-12% wet weight): 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropanoic acid (CAS N°594 -61 -6; HIBA) and methyl 2 -hydroxy-2 -methylpropanoic acid (CAS N°2110-78-3; HIBM);
- ammonium 2-oxopropane-1-sulfonate (4.5-6% wet weight; AMSA).
According to IUCLID section 1.2, these three components represent at least more than 80% of all the organic components. Regarding the other components,the degradation in soil of dimeric form of methacrylic acid (2.5-4% wet weight) is expected to be fast and complete and would be mineralized based on the methacrylic acid (EC N°201-204-4/CAS N°79-41-4) biodegradation data disseminated by ECHA.
The 2-methoxy-2-methylpropanoic acid (CAS N°13836 -62 -9) is present in too low proportions(0.5-2% wet weight)to be quantified in soil.
Therefore, the concentrations of the three major substances (the proportion of HIBM in the test substance was too low to allow detection of this component in soils) were followed in four soils exposed to the test substance for 120 days according to OECD Test guideline No. 307. The test was extended to 147 days in an effort to reach a plateau for some components.The results showed that the recovery of the three main substances directly after application were ranged between 78.2% and 109.5%, depending on substance and soil. Therefore, the extraction method was considered to be suitable.
Quantification of the three main components was accomplished by means of LC-MS/MS.
Based on the kinetic calculations the following DT50 time ranges were found, depending on test soil:
ADSA: 349 – 839 days
HIBA: 5 – 49 days
AMSA: 56 – 1424 days
The main components showed different patterns of concentration decrease. In all soils tested, the two sulfonic components (ADSA and AMSA) disappeared slowly. The concentration decrease of HIBA was clearly faster. A clear correlation between soil parameters and disappearance of the main components was not found.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.