Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-864-0 | CAS number: 75-35-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- No GLP study but equivalent to guideline study with acceptable restrictions. The highest concentration at which 1,1-dichloroethene was tested was 50% due to solubility issues. Despite the fact that the substance was not tested at the 100% concentration, the results of the study are considered to be acceptable because the stimulation index was < 1 for all tested concentrations i.e. 10%, 25% and 50%. Therefore there is no indication that a stimulation index higher than 3 could be expected by doubling the dose (100%).
Cross-referenceopen allclose all
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to other study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Preliminary assessment of the skin sensitizing activity of selected rodent carcinogens using the local lymph node assay
- Author:
- Warbrick E.V., Dearman R.J., Ashby J., Schmezer P. and Kimber I.
- Year:
- 2 001
- Bibliographic source:
- Toxicology 163(63):69
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- no Body Weights, substance not tested at 100% conc.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,1-dichloroethylene
- EC Number:
- 200-864-0
- EC Name:
- 1,1-dichloroethylene
- Cas Number:
- 75-35-4
- Molecular formula:
- C2H2Cl2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,1-dichloroethene
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): vinylidene dichloride
- Purity cited in the report: 100 % pure
- Vehicle: Acetone: olive oil (AOO v/v 4:1)
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Seralab, Oxon, UK
- Age at study initiation: 8–12 weeks old
- Housing: 4/cage on flushing metal racks
- Diet ad libitum: SDS PCD pelleted diet; Special Diets Services, Witham, Essex, UK
- Water : ad libitum
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- acetone/olive oil (4:1 v/v)
- Concentration:
- Exposure concentration (%): 0, 10, 25, 50 (dose = 25 µL)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 4 mice per dose
- Details on study design:
- INITIATION OF EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 3 (daily)
- Day(s) of challenge: 3 consecutive days
- Exposure period: 3 days
- Site: the dorsum of both ears
- Concentrations: various concentrations see table 1
- Dose: 25 µl
- Five days following initiation of exposure all mice were injected via the tail vein with 250 µl of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 20 µCi of [3H] methyl thymidine.
- Five hours later the mice were sacrificed and the draining auricular lymph nodes excised and pooled.
Single cell suspensions of LNC were prepared by mechanical disaggregation through 200-mesh stainless steel gauze.
Pooled LNC were washed twice with PBS and precipitated in 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) at 4°C overnight.
Pellets were then resuspended in 1 ml of TCA and transferred to 10 ml of scintillation fluid (Optiphase ‘Hisafe 3’, Wallac, Turku, Finland).
The incorporation of 3H-TdR was measuredby B-scintillation counting as disintegrations per minute (dpm) per node for each experimental group.
- A stimulation index (SI) relative to the concurrent vehicle-treated control was derived; an SI of 3 or greater being indicative of a chemical possessing the potential to cause contact sensitization.
- Statistics:
- EC3 is the estimated concentration required to induce an SI of 3 in the LLNA. The EC3 value was calculated by interpolating between two points on the SI axis, one immediately above, and the other immediately below, the SI value of three. Where the data points falling immediately above and below the SI value of three have the coordinates (a,b) and (c,d), respectively, then the EC3 value may be calculated using the following equation : EC3=c+[ (3−d)/(b−d)]×(a−c)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- no data
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Value:
- 631
- Test group / Remarks:
- Negative control
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Value:
- 530
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10 (w/v)%
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Value:
- 476
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25 (w/v)%
- Parameter:
- other: disintegrations per minute (DPM)
- Value:
- 575
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50 (w/v)%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- Negative control
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.84
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10 (w/v)%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.75
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25 (w/v)%
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 0.91
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50 (w/v)%
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1 : Local lymph node assay responses to test chemicals
Chemical | Chemical Vehicle | Exposure concentration (%) | dpm/node | SI | EC3 (%) |
1,1 -dichloroethene | acetone:olive oil | 0 | 631 | 1 | >50 |
10 | 530 | 0.84 | >50 | ||
25 | 476 | 0.75 | >50 | ||
50 | 575 | 0.91 | >50 |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- According to this study, 1,1-dichloroethene is not a dermal sensitizer.
- Executive summary:
The dermal sensitising potential of 1,1 -dichloroethene was tested using the Local Lymph Node Assay (Kimber and Basketter, 1992)
1,1 -dichloroethene failed to induce an increase of the stimulation index above 3 at all tested concentrations . A stimulation index for 1,1 -dichloroethene of 0.91 was observed at the highest tested concentration of 50 %.
Therefore, according to this study, 1,1-dichloroethene is not a dermal sensitizer.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.