Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-864-0 | CAS number: 75-35-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DMEL (Derived Minimum Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.792 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- carcinogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Linearised approach and high-to-low dose risk extrapolation to a risk of 4E-03 (German traffic light model).
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 62.5
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEC
- Value:
- 29.12 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- T25
- Value:
- 112 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Calculation of the T25:
Study output:
Control group
(C)
Treated
(T)
Dose (ppm)
0
25
Dose (mg/m3)
0
99.12
# Animals
50
50
# Tumors
1
12
% Tumors
2
24
Calculation of net tumor incidence:
Net tumor incidence (%) = % Tum.(T) - % Tum.(C) / [ 100% - % Tum.(C) ]
= 22.45%
Correction for standard lifespan:
- Study duration: 105 wks
- Standard lifespan: 104 wks
Corrected dose = 99.12 * 105 / 104 = 100.07 mg/m3
Calculation of T25:
T25 = corrected dose * 25% tumor incidence / net tumor incidence
= 111.45 mg/m3
Modifications of the dose descriptor:
- Differences in inhalation absorption: no correction
- Route-to-route extrapolation: no correction
- Correction factor for workers (light activity) = 6.7 m3/ 10 m3= 0.67
- Correction factor for exposure conditions = (6h/8h) * (52wk/48wk)* (75y/40y) = 1.5
with:
8h daily exposure for workers vs. 6h testing conditions
48 wk/year exposure for workers vs. 52wk/year testing conditions
75y human lifetime vs. 40y operational exposure
Modified dose descriptor:
T25 = 112.00 mg/m3
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 38 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- acute toxicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 1 250
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- other: LC50
- Value:
- 28 350 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- other: LC50
- Value:
- 47 863 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
The LC50 value (28350 mg/m3) from the acute inhalation study with rats by Zeller and Klimish (1979) was selected for the point of departure. To obtain the corrected LC50 value, the following aspects were taken into consideration:
- exposure duration: using the modified Haber’s law formula: Cn*t=k with n=3 (as specified in Appendix R8-8)
- worker light activity (10 m3/person/8h work instead of normal activity 6.7 m3/person/8h).
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 100
- Justification:
- LC50 to NOAEL extrapolation according to appendix R8-8, box 5
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- Starting point is an inhalation study.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor for other interspecies differences not related to allometry.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for intraspecies differences in workers.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value relevant for data-rich dossier.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 1.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 9 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 75.6 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Closed systems are used for the production and industrial use of 1,1-dichloroethene. Therefore dermal exposure of workers to 1,1-dichloroethene is unlikely. A dermal DNEL was nevertheless derived to provide a guidance value in case such figure would be necessary in some particular (currently not considered) cases.
No chronic dermal exposure studies are available allowing the direct calculation of a DNEL. Therefore a route-to-route extrapolation was performed based on the key value (NOAELoral 9 mg/kg bw/d) from a chronic oral study (Quast et al. 1983, 24h/day, exposure 7 days/week, 24 months treatment period).
In order to introduce a sufficient degree of conservatism in the approach the following assumptions were made:
- ABSoral = ABSdermal
- ABSrat = ABShuman
However, because the very high volatility of the substance, a conservative assumption was made that 50% of the applied substance would not be available for absorption due to evaporation leading to a NOAELdermal of 18 mg/kg bw / d. This assumption is supported by the data of Dilling (1977) and by the observation made by Fasano et al. (2008) which mention that the evaporation of the substance significantly hindered the in vitro dermal absorption experiments.
The corrected NOAEL of 18.9 mg/kg was obtained by considering the e exposure regime (24h/day, 7days/week versus 8h/day, 5 days/week).
Corrected NOAEL = 18 mg/kg bw * (24h / 8h) * (7d / 5d) = 75.6 mg/kg bw/d
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value for using an NOAEL as the starting point.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor for NOAEL obtained from a chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor for interspecies differences between rat and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor for other interspecies differences not related to allometry.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- Default factor for intraspecies differences in workers.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value relevant for data-rich dossier.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - workers
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DMEL (Derived Minimum Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.032 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- carcinogenicity
- Route of original study:
- By inhalation
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- other: Linearised approach and high-to-low dose risk extrapolation to a risk of 4E-04 (German traffic light model).
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 625
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- LOAEC
- Value:
- 29.12 mg/m³
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- T25
- Value:
- 112 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
Calculation of the T25:
See derivation of the workers inhalation systemic DMEL.
T25 = corrected dose * 25% tumor incidence / net tumor incidence
= 111.45 mg/m3
Modifications of the dose descriptor:
- Differences in inhalation absorption: no correction
- Route-to-route extrapolation: no correction
- Difference in respiratory volume: no correction
- Correction factor for exposure conditions = (6h/24h) * (5d/7d) = 0.179
with:
24h daily exposure for the general population vs. 6h testing conditions
7d/wk exposure for the general population vs. 5d/wk testing conditions
Modified dose descriptor:
T25 = 19.90 mg/m3
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 0.09 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 9 mg/kg bw/day
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 9 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
DNEL derivation was performed starting from the key value (NOAEL oral 9 mg/kg) from the chronic oral study by Quast et al. 1983.
No modification of the dose descriptor required.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value for using an NOAEL as the starting point.
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default factor for NOAEL obtained from a chronic study.
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- Default factor for interspecies differences between rat and humans.
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- Default factor for other interspecies differences not related to allometry.
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- Default factor for intraspecies differences in the general population.
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- Default value relevant for data-rich dossier.
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- No remaining uncertainties.
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- low hazard (no threshold derived)
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- medium hazard (no threshold derived)
Additional information - General Population
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.