Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1991
Report date:
1991

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
Only 10 (instead of 20) animals were used in the treatment group. According to the current guideline, 20 animals are needed to confirm a negative test result.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Buehler, E.V. 1965. Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the Guinea Pig. Arch. Dermat. 91:171-175.
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Study conducted before LLNA became the standard protocol.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diphenyl carbonate
EC Number:
203-005-8
EC Name:
Diphenyl carbonate
Cas Number:
102-09-0
Molecular formula:
C13H10O3
IUPAC Name:
diphenyl carbonate
Details on test material:
purity: 99.95 %, Phenol 0.05 %

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Induction
Route:
other: epicutaneous, occlusive for 6 hours
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
75 % diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum
Challenge
Route:
other: epicutaneous, occlusive for 6 hours
Vehicle:
petrolatum
Concentration / amount:
75 % diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum
No. of animals per dose:
10 per group (test article group, positive compound group, negative control group)
Details on study design:
This method utilises an occlusive, topical patch technique applied for six hours at Induction and Challenge. In an initial  range-finding study with 12.5 to 75% DCP, suspended in petrolatum USP,  all of the tested concentrations were not irritating. Therefore, as  maximum non-irritating concentration 75% was used for the main study.  In the Main Study (Induction Phase) the test article or positive control  article was administered to the respective group of animals by occlusive  patch, once per week for three weeks in an attempt to boost the  sensitization potential of the animal to the allergen.  Two weeks after the final induction exposure, an unused skin site of the animals was challenged with the respective test article or control articles and  evaluated for dermal reactions 24 and 48 hours later. Reactions were  compared to a negative control group of animals that received the same  concentration of test article only at the Challenge Phase. On completion  of the Challenge Phase all animals were sacrificed without necropsy. 
Challenge controls:
see "Details on study design"
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
 0.1% Dinitrochlorobenzene 

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
The positive control Dinitrochlorobenzene (0.1%) exhibited  positive reactions in 7 of 10 animals at the 24 hour reading and 6 of 10 animals in the 48 hour reading, indicating that it is a skin sensitiser. 

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 75% diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1% dinitrochlorobenzene
No. with + reactions:
7
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.1% dinitrochlorobenzene. No with. + reactions: 7.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1% dinitrochlorobenzene
No. with + reactions:
6
Total no. in group:
10
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.1% dinitrochlorobenzene. No with. + reactions: 6.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0. Clinical observations: none.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: not sensitising according to EU criteria
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, diphenyl carbonate showed no skin sensitisation potential in a Buehler test.
Executive summary:

The skin sensitisation potential of diphenyl carbonate was investigated in a Buehler test conducted in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 406 under GLP conditions. There was a deviation from the current OECD 406 guideline as only 10 (instead of 20) animals were used in the treatment group. According to the current guideline, 20 animals are needed to confirm a negative test result.

During the study female Hartley guinea pigs were dosed with 75 % diphenyl carbonate in petrolatum. This method utilises an occlusive, topical patch technique applied for six hours at Induction and Challenge. In an initial range-finding study with 12.5 to 75 % test material, suspended in petrolatum USP, all of the tested concentrations were not irritating. Therefore, as maximum non-irritating concentration 75 % was used for the main study.

In the Main Study (Induction Phase) the test or positive control material was administered to the respective group of animals by occlusive patch, once per week for three weeks in an attempt to boost the sensitisation potential of the animal to the allergen. Two weeks after the final induction exposure, an unused skin site of the animals was challenged with the respective test or control material and evaluated for dermal reactions 24 and 48 hours later. Reactions were compared to a negative control group of animals that received the same concentration of test material at the Challenge Phase only. On completion of the Challenge Phase all animals were sacrificed without necropsy.

No dermal reactions were observed in any of the animals subjected to the test material (0/10). The positive control, 0.1 % dinitrochlorobenzene, exhibited positive reactions in 7 of 10 animals at the 24 hour reading, indicating that it is a strong sensitiser. In conclusion, the test material when used at a 75% concentration in Petrolatum would be considered a non-sensitiser according to the study design.

Under the conditions of this study, diphenyl carbonate showed no skin sensitisation potential in a Buehler test.