Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-713-7 | CAS number: 109-86-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: A study that has been reported in a number of publications which between them contain sufficient detail to be able to reliably judge the eye irritancy properties of this substance.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- An objective method for the evaluation of eye irritation in vivo
- Author:
- Jacobs G, Martens M
- Year:
- 1 989
- Bibliographic source:
- Fd Chem Toxicol, 27, p255-8
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- No information
- Author:
- Parent RA
- Year:
- 1 992
- Bibliographic source:
- J Am Coll Toxicol 11, 378
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Evaluation of the in vitro uridine uptake inhibition assay in comparison with the in vivo eye irritation test as prescribed by the EEC
- Author:
- Jacobs GA, Dierickx PJ, Martens MA
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Alt Lab Animals, 15, p290-6
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 987
- Report date:
- 1987
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Observations for only 4 days
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 2-methoxyethanol
- EC Number:
- 203-713-7
- EC Name:
- 2-methoxyethanol
- Cas Number:
- 109-86-4
- Molecular formula:
- C3H8O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2-methoxyethanol
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
- Analytical purity: 99.8%
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: Stabilised with 50ppm BHT
- Other: Supplied by Janssen Chimica, Beerse, Belgium
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Proefstations voor veeteelt (Merelbeke, Belgium)
- Weight at study initiation: 2-3.5kg
- Housing: individually in mesh wire bottom cages. 40x46x47.5cm
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, pelleted Aliment Complet, 'lapins entretien ref 112, animolabo, Brussels.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum Brussels tap water.
- other: sex, male and female, albino
Test system
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: experiment was part of a larger study which examined a large number of chemicals for their eye irritancy
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 0.1ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Single application
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 7 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring criteria used for Erythema, chemosis, iritis and corneal opacity
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Application of one drop of 2% sodiumfluoroscein before visual scoring of percentage corneal damage. This was also done 72 hrs before testing to check for absence of existing lesions. Reading of ocular lesions was facilitated by use of a handslit lantern.
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.2
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 96 hours
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- not fully reversible within: 96 hours
- Remarks on result:
- probability of mild irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- < 0.1
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- < 0.1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 hours
- Remarks on result:
- probability of weak irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The mean corneal upperlayer damage (loss of epithelium measured by fluorescein retention on the cornea using a hand-slit lamp) was 5% after 4 hrs and an average of 3% over the 72 hour test period. Pain response was measured and described as "a few blinks only, normal within one or two minutes; animals didn't squeal or rub their eyes". There was no evidence of Pannus.
- Other effects:
- Average rabbit response after instillation of substance was to blink for a few minutes then to return to normal.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Whilst the cited observation period was 7 days, observations were only reported for 4 days.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- slightly irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Executive summary:
A study reported in a number of publications assessed the eye irritancy potential of 2 -methoxyethanol in rabbits. Even without a washing stage, the substance showed negligible iritis or corneal effects. Very mild chemosis was seen and slight to moderate conjunctivitis. Both of the latter were still present at the end of the experiment (96 hours of observations) but were showing signs of recovery suggesting that they would have vanished within the normal 21 day observation period. The conclusion from this study was that the initial lesions were of a mild nature and did not meet the criteria for classification as an eye irritant. Those lesions that were seen had either disappeared or were showing signs of recovery by the end of the 4 day study.
Synopsis
Not irritating.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.