Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
developmental toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1985
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: A published study which is sufficiently well reported to be able to judge it as reliable for risk assessment purposes for this end point.
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reference
Endpoint:
one-generation reproductive toxicity
Remarks:
based on test type (migrated information)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
1984
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: A published study which contains sufficient experimental detail to be able to judge it as reliable. No sperm parameters were directly examined although the design of the study was capable of detecting sperm function deficiencies.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 415 [One-Generation Reproduction Toxicity Study (before 9 October 2017)]
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
specific deviations noted
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Species:
rat
Strain:
other: Charles River CD
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories
- Age at study initiation: males: 28 days, females :70 days
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 190 +/16g approx all within 1.6 standard deviations ; Females: 240+/-14g approx, all within 1.5 standard deviations.
- Fasting period before study: none
- Housing: Environmentally controlled room, individually housed in suspended wire cages except during mating, gestation and lactation.
- Diet (ad libitum): Purina labs certified rodent chow 5002
- Water (ad libitum): tap
- Acclimation and observation period: 15 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24C
- Humidity (%): 20-70%
- Air changes (per hr): no data
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): fluorescent light 12hrs light/12hrs dark
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 5ml
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy
- After 10 days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility for a further 5 days.
- After successful mating each pregnant female was placed in a separate plastic cage.
- Other: cross-over design used.
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
no
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Premating exposure period (males): 60 days
Premating exposure period (females): 14 days , then treatment until GD13 sacrifice timepoint or weaning of offspring.
Duration of test: 101 days
Frequency of treatment:
daily
Details on study schedule:
no further information
Dose / conc.:
250 mg/kg bw/day
Dose / conc.:
500 mg/kg bw/day
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day
No. of animals per sex per dose:
25
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Other: A cross-over design was used. See table below for design.
Positive control:
No
Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly. Females on GD0, 1, 13 and 20 and lactation days 0, 7, 14 and 21.
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
not examined
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
No sperm parameters examined. Number of fertile males recorded.
Litter observations:
STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 4 postpartum: yes
- If yes, maximum of 10 pups/litter (5/sex/litter as nearly as possible); excess pups were selected randomly, killed and discarded.

PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in F1 offspring: stillbirths, live births, postnatal mortality, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain

OTHER
- Litters were observed daily for gross signs of toxicity, changes in appearance, behaviour or mortality.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
SACRIFICE (by CO2 asphyxiation)
- Male animals: All surviving animals at GD13 timepoint for females
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals 25 days after separation from males.

OTHER
For females sacrificed on GD13, intrauterine examination was performed and number of corpora lutea, implants, resorptions, and viable embryos recorded. Nongravid animal uterii were examined for evidence of early resorptions. All animals were examined externally but internal examinations were only carried out on those that died early.
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
SACRIFICE
- The F1 offspring were sacrificed at 21 days of age.

GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external examinations for signs of gross abnormalities
Statistics:
Comparison of treated to untreated groups at p<0.5 using Mann-Whitney U test (comparison of postimplantation losses), fertlility indices using Chi square test with Yates correction and/or Fishers exact test and all other parameters using Barlett's test for homogeneity and Student's t test.
Reproductive indices:
not calculated
Offspring viability indices:
not calculated
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
no effects observed
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
not specified
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
not specified
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Fertility of males and females was not affected. There were no effects on resorptions, live/dead embryo ratios, viability, corpora lutea or implants
Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects
Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Mortality / viability:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
The only statistically significant finding was a reduction in pup weight gain at the highest dosed tested in the treated females/untreated males group, suggesting slight toxicity to the neonate. This was only seen at GD14 and was not observed at the time points either side (GD4 and GD21).
Sexual maturation:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
not specified
Histopathological findings:
not specified
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
500 mg/kg bw/day
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
body weight and weight gain
Reproductive effects observed:
not specified
Conclusions:
Diethylene glycol is not toxic to the fertility of male or female rats at doses up to 1000mg/kg
Executive summary:

In a well conducted single generation fertility study which conformed to the basic requirements of an OECD guideline study, 2 -(2 -butoxyethoxy)ethanol produced no signs of toxicity to reproduction in either male or female rats when tested at oral doses up to 1000mg/kg. The only finding that was attributed to treatment was a small but statistically significant reduction in pup weight gain seen at the highest dose tested and at a single time point during gestation. The minor and transient nature of this finding is not deemed biologically significant.

Synopsis

Not toxic to reproduction

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Fertility and teratogenic studies of diethylene glycol monobutyl ether in rats and rabbits
Author:
Nolen GA, Gibson WB, Benedict JH, Briggs DW, Schardein JL
Year:
1985
Bibliographic source:
Fund appl. Toxicol. 5, 1137.

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
Deviations:
no
Remarks:
significant deviations noted
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol
EC Number:
203-961-6
EC Name:
2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol
Cas Number:
112-34-5
Molecular formula:
C8H18O3
IUPAC Name:
2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): diethylene glycol monobutyl ether.
- Analytical purity: 95% +/-2% as determined by gas chromatography. IR spectrum was identical to a 98.5% pure reference standard.
- Other: supplied by Union Carbide Company.

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Langshaw Farms Inc, Augusta, MI
- Age at study initiation: 5 months
- Housing: individually in suspended wire cages
- Diet ad libitum: Purina certified rabbit chow 5322
- Water: tap, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 72 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24
- Humidity (%): 20-70 with an occasional fluctuation to 78.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12. Received 30mg/USgal of 12.5% sodium sulphamethazine in drinking water for 7 days 6 weeks before study commenced.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
dermal
Vehicle:
water
Details on exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 10x20cm
- Type of wrap if used: no data. Not occluded, no wrap
- Time intervals for shavings or clipplings: prior to initial treatment and then weekly clipped.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Yes, warm water then dried by towel.
- Time after start of exposure: 4 hours

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 3ml/kg
- Concentration (if solution): no data
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes, 3ml/kg

VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 3ml/kg
- Concentration (if solution): no data

USE OF RESTRAINERS FOR PREVENTING INGESTION: yes, collars during exposure period
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on mating procedure:
- Impregnation procedure: artificial insemination. 3 weeks prior to insemination, does superovulated by injection of 50 USP of chorionic gonadotropin. 10 male rabbits used as semen donors - ejaculated using artificial vaginas. Ejaculate checked to ensure >60% motile before use. Equal numbers of does inseminated from each buck. After insemination, does given 100DUS of chorionic gonadotropin to ensure ovulation.
- Proof of pregnancy: Day of insemination taken as GD0
Duration of treatment / exposure:
days 8 to 19 of gestation
Frequency of treatment:
4 hours/day
Duration of test:
to GD 19
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
300 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Dose / conc.:
1 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
20
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Details on study design:
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random): Animals distributed amongst test groups by weight to ensure mean body weights within 2.9SD of means.

Examinations

Maternal examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: No data

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: No data

BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: every 3 days beginning GD0

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes, daily

POST-MORTEM EXAMINATIONS: Yes / No / No data
- Sacrifice on gestation day 29 by sodium pentobarbital
- Organs examined: no data
Ovaries and uterine content:
The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No data
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of resorptions: Yes
- other: number of vialble and non viable fetuses.
Fetal examinations:
- External examinations: Yes
- Soft tissue examinations: Yes: by the method of Staples RE (Teratol, 9, A37-8, 1974)
- Skeletal examinations: Yes: by Alizarin red S (Dawson AB, Stain Technol 1, 123-4 (1926)
- Head examinations: No data
Other: weighed, sexed. Fetal findings classified as malformations or variations.
Statistics:
Comparison of treated to control groups. Feed consumption, corpora lutea, implants, resorptions, viable fetuses fetal and, body weights by ANOVA with Bartlett's test for homogeneity and appropriate t-test for variance equality. Regression analysis on dose levels. Fetal abnormalities by Fisher's exact test. Significance set at p<0.05.
Indices:
not reported
Historical control data:
not reported

Results and discussion

Results: maternal animals

General toxicity (maternal animals)

Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
For local skin effects see table 1.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
All treated dams showed reduced weight gain but only the mid dose group reached statistical significance and there was clearly no dose respose relationship. The standard deviations of the treated animals were >50% of the means. These effects were not thought to be related to the amount of dose absorbed.

Effect levels (maternal animals)

open allclose all
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
> 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis for effect level:
other: maternal toxicity
Remarks on result:
other: No adverse effects observed
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
> 100 - < 300 mg/kg bw (total dose)
Basis for effect level:
other: other:

Results (fetuses)

Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
Occasional isolated effects in single dams across dose groups was not attributed to treatment (one abortion in high dose group, 1 early delivery in mid dose group). There were no significant differences seen in the mean  numbers of corpora lutea, implants, resorptions or viable  foetuses or in the mean foetal body weight. and incidence of skeletal  anomalies or of gross or visceral malformations.

Effect levels (fetuses)

Remarks on result:
not determinable due to absence of adverse toxic effects

Fetal abnormalities

Abnormalities:
no effects observed

Overall developmental toxicity

Developmental effects observed:
not specified

Any other information on results incl. tables

Skin irritancy was noted as follows after approximately one week of treatment and persisted until sacrifice:

 Dose group:  Control and 100mg/kg  300mg/kg  1000mg/kg
 Findings:  No effects  6/20 slight erythema5/20 desquamation All animals showed moderate irritation (edema, fissuring, coriaceousness)


  

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
2-(2-butoxyethoxy)ethanol is not teratogenic by the dermal route of exposure
Executive summary:

In a well conducted teratology study which conformed to the basic OECD guideline requirements, 2 -(2 -butoxyethoxy)ethanol produced no signs of developmental toxicity when tested at doses up to 1000mg/kg bw/day applied by the dermal route. The only finding that was clearly attributed to treatment was significant irritation at the site of application manifest at doses from 300mg/kg bw/day upwards. There was some evidence for a reduction in maternal body weight gain, but this was only significant in the mid dose animals and there was no clear dose response relationship.