Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-524-8 | CAS number: 71949-28-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8.8 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 10
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 40
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
Kinetics (absorption figures for oral, dermal and inhalation route of exposure)
Oral and dermal absorption values can be derived from the available substance specific data: oral absorption is assumed to be 2% and dermal absorption is assumed to be 0.1%.
No data on inhalation absorption are available, but from data on intratracheal absorption 1% absorption can be assumed. It is unknown whether inhalation exposure will result in the same amount of absorption, therefore as a worst case assumption inhalation absorption is set to be 10%.
Acute toxicity
ZPS does not have to be classified for acute toxicity and therefore derivation of a DNELacute is not necessary.
Repeated dose toxicity
The study considered for DNEL derivation of ZPS is the 90 days oral toxicity study with rats. Dietary administration of ZPS to rats for 13 weeks at dose levels of 25, 250 and 2500 mg/kg bw/day elicited a variety of effects at 250 and 2500 mg/kg/day.
Histopathologically, the main effect of treatment was caecitis accompanied by colitis or proctitis in the large intestine of animals treated at 250 and 2500 mg/kg bw/day and squamous hyperplasia of the limiting ridge of the forestomach in animals treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day (effects in the forestomach are not relevant for humans). The significance of these changes in animals fed at 2500 mg/kg bw/day of the substance in the diet is uncertain. The changes may represent a low-grade mucosal irritation or be secondary to nutritional imbalance, accumulation of test substance in diet or to a disturbance of the normal luminal flora. In females treated at 2500 mg/kg bw/day there was an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the kidney proximal tubular epithelium. This probably reflects changes associated with excretion of the test article.
In conclusion, 25 mg/kg bw/day is considered the local NOAEL (based on caecitis accompanied by colitis or proctitis in the large intestine of animals treated at 250 mg/kg bw/day, the significance of these changes in animals fed at 2500 mg/kg bw/day of the substance in the diet is uncertain) and 250 mg/kg bw/day is considered the systemic NOAEL (based on an increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females).
Mutagenicity
ZPS is considered to be not genotoxic.
Reproduction toxicity
No developmental toxicity was observed in an oral prenatal developmental toxicity study in rats with ZPS (tested at 0, 0.25, 2.5, 250 and 2500 mg/kg bw/day). Thus, the NOAEL for developmental toxicity was considered 2500 mg/kg bw/day. No DNEL has to be derived for developmental toxicity.
The NOAEL for maternal toxicity was 2500 mg/kg bw/day. All of the dams at the three highest doses had green-tinted viscera, with the discoloration being especially pronounced at the two highest dosages, but this was not considered adverse.
There are no indications from the available data that dams are more sensitive regarding systemic effects compared to animals exposed in the repeated dose toxicity studies.
Long-term – dermal, systemic effects (based on sub-chronic oral toxicity study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 250 mg/kg bw/day |
Increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females in the high dose group |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
x 2/0.1 |
Oral absorption is assumed to be 2%, dermal absorption is assumed to be 0.1%. |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4 |
Assessment factor for allometric scaling. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
250 x 2 / (0.1 x 4 x 5 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 125 mg/kg bw/day |
Long-term - dermal, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived.
Long-term – inhalation, systemic effects (based on sub-chronic oral toxicity study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 250 mg/kg bw/day |
Increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females in the high dose group |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
: 0.38
x 6.7 m3/10 m3
x 2/10 |
An 8 h respiratory volume of 0.38 m3/kg bw for rats was used for conversion into NOAEL upon inhalation exposure.
Correction for activity driven differences of respiratory volumes in workers compared to workers in rest.
Oral absorption is assumed to be 2%, 10% absorption is assumed for the inhalation route. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
250 x 6.7 x 2 / (0.38 x 10 x 10) = 88 mg/m3 |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1 |
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation. |
Intraspecies |
5 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
88 / (1 x 5 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 8.8 mg/m3 |
Long-term - inhalation, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 2.2 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 20
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 62.5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 3.1 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 80
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
Long-term – dermal, systemic effects (based on sub-chronic oral toxicity study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 250 mg/kg bw/day |
Increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females in the high dose group |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
x 2/0.1 |
Oral absorption is assumed to be 2%, dermal absorption is assumed to be 0.1%. |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4 |
Assessment factor for allometric scaling. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
250 x 2 / (0.1 x 4 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 62.5 mg/kg bw/day |
Long-term - dermal, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived.
Long-term – inhalation, systemic effects (based on sub-chronic oral toxicity study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 250 mg/kg bw/day |
Increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females in the high dose group |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
: 1.15
x 2/10 |
A 24 h respiratory volume of 1.15 m3/kg bw for rats was used for conversion into NOAEL upon inhalation exposure.
Oral absorption is assumed to be 2%, 10% absorption is assumed for the inhalation route. |
Modified dose-descriptor |
250 x 2 / (1.15 x 10) = 43 mg/m3 |
|
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1 |
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case of oral to inhalation route to route extrapolation. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
43 / (1 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 2.2 mg/m3 |
Long-term - inhalation, local effects
No data are available based on which a DNEL for local effects can be derived.
Long-term – oral, systemic effects (based on sub-chronic oral toxicity study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 250 mg/kg bw/day |
Increase in hyaline droplet accumulation in the proximal tubular epithelium of the kidney in females in the high dose group |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
- |
- |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
4 |
Assessment factor for allometric scaling. |
Intraspecies |
10 |
Default assessment factor |
Exposure duration |
2 |
Extrapolation to chronic exposure based on a sub-chronic toxicity study |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
250 / (4 x 10 x 2 x 1 x 1) = 3.1 mg/kg bw/day |
Long-term – oral, local effects (based on sub-chronic oral toxicity study with rats)
Description |
Value |
Remark |
Step 1) Relevant dose-descriptor |
NOAEL: 25 mg/kg bw/day |
Caecitis in the large intestine, accompanied by colitis or proctitis. |
Step 2) Modification of starting point |
- |
- |
Step 3) Assessment factors |
|
|
Interspecies |
1 |
No allometric scaling has to be applied in case the critical effect is a local effect |
Intraspecies |
5 |
A lower assessment factor is applied, as the critical effect is a local effect which is hardly influenced by toxicodynamics and kinetics |
Exposure duration |
1 |
The local effects observed are not influenced by exposure duration |
Dose response |
1 |
|
Quality of database |
1 |
|
DNEL |
Value |
|
|
25 / (1 x 5 x 1 x 1 x 1) = 5 mg/kg bw/day |
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.