Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-795-6 | CAS number: 73-22-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Repeated dose toxicity: oral
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- sub-chronic toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2007-11-21 to 2008-03-19
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study according to OECD Guideline 408
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 009
- Report date:
- 2009
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 408 (Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.3100 (90-Day Oral Toxicity in Rodents)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- L-tryptophan
- EC Number:
- 200-795-6
- EC Name:
- L-tryptophan
- Cas Number:
- 73-22-3
- Molecular formula:
- C11H12N2O2
- IUPAC Name:
- L-tryptophan
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Remarks:
- migrated information: powder
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Source: Harlan Italy S.r.l.
Weight (g): 75 – 99
Age (days): 27 - 29
Pre-dose acclimatisation period: ca. 2 weeks
Housing: groups of 5 animals/sex in polycarbonate cages equipped with a stainless steel mesh lid and floor
Diet: laboratory powdered rodent diet (4 RF 21) ad libitum
Water: ad libitum
Environmental conditions:
Temperature (°C): 22 ± 2
Relative humidity (%): 55 ± 15
Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12 by artificial light
Air changes (per hr): 15-20
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: feed
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on oral exposure:
- Rate of diet preparation: weekly
The test item was formulated, using powdered rodent diet (4RF21), by initial preparation of a pre-mix followed by dilution with further quantities of diet and mixing at fixed concentrations of 5000, 15000 and 50000 ppm. Formulations were prepared separately for each group. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Before start of treatment, formulation analysis was performed in order to confirm the acceptability of the analytical method and if the stability of the formulation was satisfactory. The stability of the formulated test item was assessed over a period of 20 days. In addition, samples of formulations prepared in weeks 1 and 13 of the study were analysed to check the homogeneity and concentration. Results were satisfactory being inside the limits of acceptance (90-110%).
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 90 days
Recovery groups (control and high dose group) were sacrificed after 4 weeks of recovery - Frequency of treatment:
- continuously via diet
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 5000, 15000 or 50000 ppm (m: ca. 0, 366, 1069 or 3582 mg/kg bw/d; f: ca. 0, 401, 1214 or 3946 mg/kg bw/d)
Basis:
nominal in diet
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10
- Control animals:
- yes, plain diet
- Details on study design:
- Dose selection rationale: Based on a 4 week range-finding study
Rationale for animal assignment: The Sprague Dawley rat was the species and strain of choice because it is accepted by many regulatory authorities and there is ample experience and background data on this species and strain
Examinations
- Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: yes (twice daily)
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: yes (once before the administration (day -1), as well as once daily during treatment)
BODY WEIGHT: yes (on the day of allocation to treatment groups, on the day that treatment commenced, twice weekly thereafter and just prior to necropsy)
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE: yes (at weekly intervals)
WATER CONSUMPTION: no
OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: yes (just prior to the commencement of treatment by means of an ophthalmoscope, and by a slit-lamp microscope, after the instillation of 0.5% Tropicamide. The eyes of all animals from high dose and control groups were re-examined during week 12 of treatment. The examination was also extended to the other treated groups. Since no treatment-related changes were observed the examination was not repeated during week 4 of recovery)
HAEMATOLOGY: yes (according to guideline)
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: yes (according to guideline)
URINALYSIS: yes (according to guideline)
NEUROBEHAVIOURAL EXAMINATION: yes (observations included changes in gait and posture, reactivity to handling, presence of clonic or tonic movements, stereotypies or bizarre behaviour and effects on the autonomic nervous system). Motor activity of all animals was measured once during week 12 of treatment and once during week 4 of recovery by an automated activity recording. - Sacrifice and pathology:
- GROSS PATHOLOGY: yes (determination of weights of adrenal glands, brain, epididymides, heart, liver, kidneys, ovaries, pituitary gland, testes, spleen, thymus, uterus – cervix)
HISTOPATHOLOGY: yes (all major/relevant organs according to guideline) - Statistics:
- For continuous variables the significance of the differences amongst groups was assessed by analysis of variance. Differences between each treated group and the control group were assessed by Dunnett's test using a pooled error variance. The homogeneity of the data was verified by Bartlett's test before Dunnett's test. If data were found to be inhomogeneous a Modified t test (Cochran and Cox) was applied. The mean values, standard deviations and statistical analysis were calculated from the actual values in the computer without rounding off. Statistical analysis of histopathology findings was carried out by means of the non-parametric Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- no effects observed
- Haematological findings:
- no effects observed
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- no effects observed
- Urinalysis findings:
- no effects observed
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- no effects observed
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- no effects observed
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Details on results:
- Mortality:
No mortality occurred during the study.
Clinical signs, observations of cage tray, motor activity and neurotoxicity assessment:
Hair loss was the only relevant sign at clinical examination and was observed mainly in animals dosed with 3582 mg/kg bw/d. Complete reversibility was observed during the recovery period. No other toxicologically relevant signs were seen during the study including neurotoxicity evaluation, motor activity and sensory reactivity to stimuli assessment. Moderate yellow staining on the cage tray was reported at >= 3582 mg/kg bw/d indicating that the substance was excreted via urine.
Body weight:
Statistically significant reduction (up to –12%) in mean body weight was observed in animals dosed with >= 1069 mg/kg bw/d of both sexes during the study. Partially (females) or complete (males) recovery was noted during the recovery period. Compared with controls these differences were insufficient in magnitude to be considered of toxicological significance.
Food consumption:
Food consumption in both sexes was reduced at >= 1069 mg/kg bw/d, while no relevant differences were noted between controls and dosed animals during the recovery period.
Terminal body weight and organ weights:
Terminal body weight reflected the decreases seen in body weight in animals given >= 1069 mg/kg bw/d. Slight increases in absolute and/or relative liver weights in >= 3582 mg/kg bw/d animals of both sexes and in spleen weight only in 3946 mg/kg bw/d females were seen. All these changes, although statistically significant, were not considered treatment-related or with biological significance since no effects were found at the histopathological evaluation.
At the end of the recovery period, kidney and spleen weights recovered. Liver weight completely recovered in males and partially in females. All the above mentioned changes were not considered to be treatment-related or of biological significance since no effects were found at the histopathological evaluation.
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 3 764 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: see 'Remark'
Target system / organ toxicity
- Critical effects observed:
- not specified
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- L-tryptophan was tested in a 90 d oral study (0, 5000, 15000 or 50000 ppm in diet) with GLP compliance according to OECD guideline 408. Recovery groups had a 4 week treatment-free period. The calculated mean achieved dosages for 13 weeks of treatment were 0, 366, 1069 or 3581 mg/kg bw/d for males and 0, 401, 1214 or 3946 mg/kg bw/d for females. No relevant toxicological findings were noted during the study including neurotoxicity assessment, motor activity and sensory reactivity to stimuli, and there were also no ophthalmic lesions. The slight decreases in body weight at >= 1069 mg/kg bw/d and the decreases in food consumption at >= 3582 mg/kg bw/d were of insufficient magnitude to be considered of toxicological significance. Changes observed in some biochemical parameters at the end of the treatment period showed a complete/partial reversibility at the end of the recovery period. Therefore, these findings were considered of no toxicological significance. No toxicological significance was attributed to some changes recorded at the macroscopic observations (dark coloration and/or swelling shape of the spleen seen in treated animals mainly at >= 3582 mg/kg bw/d), as the histopathological evaluation did not confirm these changes. The histopathological examination did not reveal differences in the incidence of the findings observed in treated animals when compared with controls.
Therefore, from this study a NOAEL of ca. 3764 mg/kg bw/d (mean value for males and females) corresponding to 50000 ppm can be derived.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.