Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP guideline study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
- measurement of thickness of skin fold rather than observation of skin color
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
- measurement of thickness of skin fold rather than observation of skin color
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
This study has been conducted when the LLNA was not yet the standard method.
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Dunkin-Hartley
Sex:
male
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Versuchstieranstalt Winkelmann, Borchen, Kreis Paderborn
- Age at study initiation: 5 - 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 360 g (314 - 416 g)
- Housing: Makrolon-cages (type IV), on soft wood granulate in groups of 5 animals
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Altromin 3022, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): tap water in 2 750 mL plastic bottles, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 d

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22±2 °C
- Humidity (%): 50%
- Air changes (per hr): 10-fold/h
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light (artificial lightning)

IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: Nov. 04, 1986 to Dec. 12, 1986
Route:
intradermal
Vehicle:
other: Cremophor EL (2% v/v) in water for injection purposes
Concentration / amount:
- intradermal injection: 0.5%
- dermal application 25%, 25% and 10%
Route:
other: dermal
Vehicle:
other: Cremophor EL (2% v/v) in water for injection purposes
Concentration / amount:
- intradermal injection: 0.5%
- dermal application 25%, 25% and 10%
No. of animals per dose:
- test group: 20 animals
- 2 Control groups: 10 animals each
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
25%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Clinical observations:
none
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. Group: test group. Dose level: 25%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0. Clinical observations: none.

1. Auslösung (25%ige Prüfmusterformu1ierung)

 

1.Kontrollgruppe

 

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

 

vor Behandl.

vor Behandl.

48h

72h

48h

72h

 

 

nach Behandlung

Hautfaltendicke in mm

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

1.57

1.49

1.83

1.80

1.65

1.62

S

0.14

0.13

0.11

0.13

0.10

0.11

 

Prüfmustergruppe

 

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

 

vor Behandl.

vor Behandl.

48h

72h

48h

72h

 

 

nach Behandlung

Hautfaltendicke in mm

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

1.58

1.49

1.85

1.84

1.61

1.58

S

0.10

0.09

0.14

0.13

0.12

0.10

M =Mittelwert

S=Standardabweichung

Behandl.=Behandlung

 

2. Auslösung (10%ige Prüfmusterformu1ierung)

 

2.Kontrollgruppe

 

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

 

vor Behandl.

vor Behandl.

48h

72h

48h

72h

 

 

nach Behandlung

Hautfaltendicke in mm

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

1.53

1.52

1.66

1.63

1.57

1.56

S

0.17

0.17

0.23

0.22

0.15

0.18

 

Prüfmustergruppe

 

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

Prüfmusterseite

Kontrollseite

 

vor Behandl.

vor Behandl.

48h

72h

48h

72h

 

 

nach Behandlung

Hautfaltendicke in mm

 

 

 

 

 

 

M

1.71

1.69

1.89

1.96

1.73

1.76

S

0.16

0.14

0.20

0.16

0.18

0.15

M =Mittelwert

S=Standardabweichung

Behandl.=Behandlung

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, the test substance showed no evidence for sensitizing properties in guinea pigs.
Executive summary:

A study was conducted to assess the sensitizing potential of the test substance in male guinea pigs (DHPW) according to EU Method B.6. and OECD guideline 406 in compliance with GLP.

Intradermal induction was performed using 25% test substance in Cremophor EL (2% v/v in water). Dermal induction and challenge treatment were carried out with 10% test substance in Cremophor EL (2% v/v in water).

The validity of the test system is confirmed by the periodically conducted positive control test using formaldehyde for the maximization test.

Under the test conditions, the test substance showed no evidence for sensitizing properties in guinea pigs. 

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

A study was conducted to assess the sensitizing potential of the test substance in male guinea pigs (DHPW) according to EU Method B.6. and OECD guideline 406 in compliance with GLP.

Intradermal induction was performed using 25% test substance in Cremophor EL (2% v/v in water). Dermal induction and challenge treatment were carried out with 10% test substance in Cremophor EL (2% v/v in water).

The validity of the test system is confirmed by the periodically conducted positive control test using formaldehyde for the maximization test.

Under the test conditions, the test substance showed no evidence for sensitizing properties in guinea pigs. 


Migrated from Short description of key information:
GLP guideline study according to OECD 406

Justification for selection of skin sensitisation endpoint:
GLP guideline study

Justification for classification or non-classification

In an GLP guideline study according to OECD 406, the test substance showed no evidence for sensitizing properties in guinea pigs.