Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 306-238-4 | CAS number: 96690-44-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Remarks:
- In vitro skin corrosion test with EpiDerm (EPI-200))
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From July 26, 2017 to July 27, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 29 July 2016
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.40 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Test (TER))
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Remarks:
- EpiDerm Skin Model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Justification for test system used:
- The model consists of normal, human-derived epidermal keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a multilayered, highly differentiated model of the human epidermis. It consists of organized basal, spinous and granular layers, and a multi-layered stratum corneum containing intercellular lamellar lipid layers arranged in patterns analogous to those found in vivo. The EpiDerm tissues (surface 0.6 cm²) were cultured on polycarbonate membranes of 10 mm cell culture inserts. Recommended test system in international guidelines (OECD and EC)
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- Test system specifications: Three-dimensional human skin model, comprising a reconstructed epidermis with a functional stratum corneum was supplied by MatTek In Vitro Life ScienceLaboratories, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
System conditions: Human keratinocytes are used to construct the epithelium. Multiple layers of viable epithelial cells are present under a functional stratum corneum. The stratum corneum is multi-layered with the necessary lipid profile to produce a functional barrier. The containment properties of the model prevent the passage of material around the stratum corneum to the viable model tissue. The skin model was supplied free of contamination with bacteria, mycoplasma and fungi.
Assessment of MTT Interacting substances:In order to assess the potential non-specific reduction of the test article, 25 mg of test substance was added to 1 mL of 1.0 mg/mL MTT and the colour change was assessed after incubation for 60 minutes at 37±1°C, 5±1% CO2, 95% RH. There was no change in colour therefore the test article did not interact with MTT.
Assessment for colour interference: 25 mg of test substance was added to both 0.3 mL deionized water and isopropanol before being incubated for 60 minutes at 37±1°C, 5±1% CO2, 95% RH. The solution did not become coloured, therefore the test article was deemed not to have the potential to stain the tissue.
Application of test and control substances: On the day of receipt EpiDerm tissues were transferred to refrigerator at 2 to 8°C and stored overnight. The next day, approximately 1.5 hours before starting the assay, the tissues were prepared for treatment in labelled 6-well plates. The test was performed on a total of four tissues per test substance, negative and positive control, out of which two were used for a 3 minute application and two tissues were used for a 1 hour application. Approximately 25 mg of the test substance was applied to the tissue, which was pre-moistened with 25 μL water to ensure good contact with the tissue surface. Further tissues were concurrently treated with 50 μL distilled water (negative control) and with 50 μL 8M potassium hydroxide (positive control). After the 3 minute or 1-hour contact periods, the tissues were washed with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) to remove residual material. The rinsed tissues were kept in 24-well plates (holding plates) until all tissues were dosed and rinsed. The positive control material was a direct MTT reducer, therefore additional positive controls were performed. The positive control article was applied to two freeze-killed tissues (thawed on the day of treatment) per exposure time. Cell viability measurements: 1 mg/mL MTT-medium and were incubated for 3 hours (37±1°C, 5±1% CO2, 95% RH). After incubation any resultant colour was extracted with 2 mL isopropanol overnight. The optical density of each resultant extract was determined spectrophotometrically at 570 nm and cell viability was calculated for each tissue as a percentage of the mean of the negative control tissue. Skin corrosivity potential of the test substance was classified according to the remaining cell viability obtained after test substance treatment with either of the two treatment times.
Cell viability measurements: Once all tissues had been rinsed, they were transferred to wells containing 300 μL of 1 mg/mL MTT-medium and were incubated for 3 hours (37±1°C, 5±1% CO2, 95% RH). After incubation any resultant colour was extracted with 2 mL isopropanol overnight. The optical density of each resultant extract was determined spectrophotometrically at 570 nm and cell viability was calculated for each tissue as a percentage of the mean of the negative control tissue. Skin corrosivity potential of the test article was classified according to the remaining cell viability obtained after test article treatment with either of the two treatment times. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- 25 mg pre-moistened with 25 μL water to ensure good contact with the tissue surface
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 minutes and 1 h
- Number of replicates:
- 2
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- cytotoxicity
- Run / experiment:
- 3 min treatment
- Value:
- ca. 58
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Remarks:
- cytotoxicity
- Run / experiment:
- 1 h treatment
- Value:
- ca. 20.4
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- -The test substance was checked for color interference in aqueous conditions and possible direct MTT reduction by adding the test substance to MTT medium. Because the solutions did not turn blue / purple nor a blue / purple precipitate was observed it was concluded that the test substance did not interfere with the MTT endpoint.
The mean absorption at 570 nm measured after treatment with the test substance and controls were as follows:
1) Negative control 1.103 (3 minute application) and 1.115 (1 h application)
2) Test substance 0.634 (3 minute application) and 0.228 (1 h application)
3) Positive control 0.312 (3 minute application) and 0.186 (1 h application)
- The mean tissue viability obtained after 3 minute and 1 h treatments with the test substance compared to the negative control tissues. Skin corrosion is expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after the 3 minute and 1 h treatments with the test substance compared to the negative control tissues was 58% and 20.4% respectively. Because the mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was not below 50% after 3 minutes treatment and not below 15% after 1 h treatment the test substance is considered to be not corrosive.
- The OD values for the negative controls were between 0.8 and 2.8, and were within observed historical ranges. The mean relative tissue viability following the 1 h exposure to the positive control was -0.4%.
- In the range of 20 - 100% viability the coefficient of variation between tissue replicates was <30%, indicating that the test system functioned properly. The coefficient of variation between tissue replicates treated with the test substance was 29.97% for the 3-minute treatment, which is above acceptance criteria. Since all individual viabilities were >50%, the test outcome was considered valid. - Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be non corrosive to skin based on human three dimensional epidermal model (EpiDerm (EPI-200)).
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the in vitro skin corrosion potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, according to OECD Guideline 431 and EU Method B.40 bis, in compliance with GLP. The test substance was checked for colour interference in aqueous conditions and possible interference with MTT reduction by adding the test substance to MTT medium. Because the solutions did not turn blue/purple nor a blue/purple precipitate was observed, it was concluded that the test substance did not interfere with the MTT. Duplicate tissue samples were exposed to approximately 25 mg of the test substance, which was pre-moistened with 25 μL water to ensure good contact with the tissue surface. Post treatment, a determination of the cytotoxic effect was performed. Cytotoxicity was expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment. Skin corrosion was expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. The positive control had a mean relative tissue viability of -0.4% after the 1 h exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of OECD Guideline 431 and the laboratory historical control data range. In the range of 20 - 100% viability the coefficient of variation between tissue replicates was <30%, indicating that the test system functioned properly. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 3 min and 1 h treatment periods with the test substance compared to the negative control tissues were 58% and 20.4%, respectively. Because the mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was above 50 and 15% after 3 min and 1 h respectively, so the test substance is considered to be non-corrosive. Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be non-corrosive to skin based on human three dimensional epidermal model (Payne, 2017).
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From December 04, 2017 to December 08, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.46 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Model Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- human
- Cell type:
- non-transformed keratinocytes
- Cell source:
- other: Not specified
- Justification for test system used:
- Three-dimensional human skin model, comprising a reconstructed epidermis with a functional stratum corneum Human keratinocytes are used to construct the epithelium. Multiple layers of viable epithelial cells are present under a functional stratum corneum. The stratum corneum is multi-layered with the necessary lipid profile to produce a functional barrier. The containment properties of the model prevent the passage of material around the stratum corneum to the viable model tissue. The skin model is supplied free of contamination with bacteria, mycoplasma and fungi. Recommended test system in international guidelines (OECD and EC).
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- Specification: EpiDermTM SIT (EPI-200) three-dimensional human skin model, comprising a reconstructed epidermis with a functional stratum corneum, supplied by MatTek In Vitro Life Science Laboratories, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
General model conditions: Human keratinocytes are used to construct the epithelium. Multiple layers of viable epithelial cells are present under a functional stratum corneum. The stratum corneum is multi-layered with the necessary lipid profile to produce a functional barrier. The containment properties of the model prevent the passage of material around the stratum corneum to the viable model tissue. The skin model is supplied free of contamination with bacteria, mycoplasma and fungi.
Functional Model Conditions: The magnitude of viability is quantified using MTT and measuring the optical density (OD) of the extracted (solubilised) dye from each tissue. The negative control tissue has been shown to be stable in culture for the duration of the test exposure period. The stratum corneum is sufficiently robust to resist the rapid penetration of certain cytotoxic marker chemicals (e.g. 5% SDS). The tissue has been shown to demonstrate reproducibility over time. - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- 25 mg
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 h
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 41 h 50 minutes
- Number of replicates:
- Triplicate
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 1 h
- Value:
- 3.3
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Category 2 (irritant) based on CLP criteria
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, based on the percentage of viability of 3.3%, the test substance was concluded to be irritant to the skin.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the skin irritation potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, using Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method, according to OECD Guideline 439, in compliance with GLP. The test substance was checked for colour interference in aqueous conditions and possible interference with MTT reduction by adding the test substance to MTT medium. Because the solutions did not turn blue/purple nor a blue/purple precipitate was observed, it was concluded that the test substance did not interfere with the MTT. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with the test substance, positive or negative control by application of 25 mg (tissues wetted with 25 µLwith PBS) for 60 min (25 min at room temperature and 35 min at 37°C, 5% CO2) and 42 h post incubation period. PBS was used as negative control and 5% of sodium dodecyl sulphate solution in PBS was used as positive control. Subsequently, viability of the tissues was assessed and compared to the negative control. The absolute mean of the positive and negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of the guideline and the laboratory historical control data range indicated that the test system functioned properly. Under the study conditions, based on the percentage of viability of 3.3%, the test substance was concluded to be irritant to the skin. (Dreher, 2018).
Referenceopen allclose all
Cell viability measurement:
Substance | Tissue Replicate | OD570 | Corrected Mean | % Relative Survival | Standard Deviation | Coefficient of Variance | |||
Aliquot 1 | Aliquot 2 | Mean | Tissue | Mean | |||||
Negative control | A | 1.172 | 1.160 | 1.166 | 1.166 | 102.1 | 100 | 2.17 | 2.17 |
B | 1.090 | 1.143 | 1.116 | 1.116 | 97.8 | ||||
C | 1.127 | 1.157 | 1.142 | 1.142 | 100.1 | ||||
Test substance | A | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 0.037 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 0.31 | 9.59 |
B | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 0.041 | 3.6 | ||||
C | 0.034 | 0.041 | 0.034 | 0.034 | 3.0 | ||||
Positive control | A | 0.035 | 0.043 | 0.039 | 0.039 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 0.26 | 8.17 |
B | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 0.033 | 2.9 | ||||
C | 0.037 | 0.039 | 0.038 | 0.038 | 3.3 | ||||
Blank | 0 | -0.00 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From October 16, 2017 to October 19, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 492 (Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- This study was performed in order to evaluate the potential of test substance in a Reconstructed human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) model in an in vitro study. The EpiOcularTM Eye Irritation Test (EIT) predicts the acute ocular irritation potential of chemicals by measurement of irreversible tissue damage caused by cytotoxic effects in the human cornea model. Within a testing strategy, the EpiOcularTM EIT is used as a replacement of the Draize Eye Irritation Test. It is utilized for the classification and labelling of chemicals concerning their eye irritation potential. The EpiOcularTM EIT is intended to differentiate substances that are “not eye irritant” from those that require labelling as either GHS category 1 or 2 for serious eye damage or eye irritation potential. Eye irritant materials are identified by their ability to produce a decrease in cell viability as determined. The cell viability is measured by dehydrogenase conversion of MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide), present in cell mitochondria, into a blue formazan salt that is quantitatively measured after extraction from tissues. The percentage reduction of cell viability in comparison with untreated negative controls is used to predict the eye irritation potential.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- human
- Strain:
- other: human-derived keratinocytes
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The EpiOcular tissue consists of normal, human-derived keratinocytes which have been cultured to form a stratified squamous epithelium similar to that found in the human cornea. It consists of highly organized basal cells. These cells are not transformed or transfected with genes to induce an extended life span. The EpiOcularTM tissues are cultured in specially prepared cell culture inserts with a porous membrane through which nutrients can pass to the cells. The tissue surface is 0.6 cm2.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 1) Tissue 51.7 mg
2) Tissue 49.8 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 h
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- 18 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Duplicates
- Irritation parameter:
- other: % relative tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 6 h
- Value:
- 1.1
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not valid
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- positive indication of irritation
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP criteria not met (Inconclusive)
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, based on the percentage viability of 1.1%, the test substance was considered either eye irritant or inducing serious eye damage to the human eye.
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, using Reconstructed human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) test method, according to OECD Guideline 492, in compliance with GLP. Two tissues of the EpiOcularTM tissue model were treated with the test substance, positive or negative control. Tissues were pre-wetted with 20 μL of PBS (Sterile Phosphate Buffered Saline) prior to topical application of approximately 50±2 mg of neat test substance. Sterile demineralised water was used as negative control and methyl acetate as positive control. After 6 h exposure on the surface of EpiOcularTM reconstructed ocular epithelium and 18 h post-incubation time, the viability of the tissues was assessed and compared to a negative control. The MTT viability test readings were conducted at 570 nm without reference filter. Under the study conditions, based on the percentage viability of 1.1%, the test substance was concluded to be either eye irritant or inducing serious eye damage to the human eye (Andres, 2018).
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Remarks:
- The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Assay (BCOP)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted 26 July 2013)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- other: Bovine
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Test System: Bovine eyes were used as soon as possible after slaughter.
Rationale: In the interest of sound science and animal welfare, a sequential testing strategy is recommended to minimize the need of in vivo testing (1-6). As a consequence a validated and accepted in vitro test for eye irritation should be performed before in vivo tests are conducted. One of the proposed validated in vitro eye irritation tests is the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test.
Source: Bovine eyes from young cattle were obtained from the slaughterhouse, where the eyes were excised by a slaughterhouse employee as soon as possible after slaughter.
Transport: Eyes were collected after slaughter, completely immersed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (containing penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 μg/mL) in a suitably sized container and transported on the same day to the testing facility. - Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- 750 µL (20%w/v test substance in 0.9% sodium chloride solution) at 32°C
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period (in vivo):
- -
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- Permeability endpoint, 1 mL of sodium fluorescein (5 mg/mL solution) was added into the anterior chamber and the corneas were incubated in the vertical position for 1 h and 25 minutes.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- Preparation of Corneas:
On arrival at the test facility the eyes were carefully examined for defects including increased opacity, scratches and neovascularisation. Only corneas free from such defects were used.
Cornea Selection and Opacity Reading:
Upon arrival at the test facility, the corneas were excised from the eyes and loaded onto the specifically designed holders. Both chambers of each holder were filled with pre-warmed Minimal Essential Medium (MEM), with the posterior chamber filled first, ensuring that no bubbles were formed. The holders were incubated at 32±1°C for 1 hour. After the incubation, the media was removed from both the anterior and posterior chambers. Fresh media was added to the posterior chamber first and then the anterior chamber (this media replacement order ensured the cornea retained its natural curvature as much as possible). The opacity of each cornea was measured using an opacitometer. Any corneas found to have scratches or increased neovascularization or an opacity of >7 opacity units when examined prior to treatment were discarded.
Treatment of Corneas and Opacity Measurements:
A volume of 750 μL of the test susbtance formulation was applied to each of three corneas followed by a four hour incubation at 32°C. After this incubation, each cornea was washed with media containing phenol red (as a pH indicator) until this indicator
showed no pH effect occurring (and demonstrating that the test article had been removed successfully). The corneas were then washed once in media without phenol red, corneal opacity was measured and the anterior chamber emptied. For the permeability endpoint, 1 mL of sodium fluorescein (5 mg/mL solution) was added into the anterior chamber and the corneas were incubated in the vertical position for 1 hour and 25 minutes. Following this period, the media in the posterior chamber was
removed and held in a labelled tube. Three 350 μL aliqots of this media (per cornea) were analysed for optical density at 490 nanometers (OD490).
A volume of 750 μL of the negative or positive control was similarly applied to further groups of three corneas. These groups were subject to the procedures detailed above. It was noted during the permeability assessment that a small gap was present
between the anterior and posterior chambers, for one replicate of the negative control. This replicate was subsequently excluded from all analysis, with the mean value from the remaining two negative control replicates being used.
Test substance formulation: The test substance was ground to a fine powder, and tested as a 20% w/v solution in 0.9% sodium chloride solution. - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Run / experiment:
- 4 h exposure
- Value:
- 23
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Inconcluisve
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- The mean corrected opacity reading for the test substance was 23.0. The mean corrected opacity reading for the negative control was 0.0. This result was calculated using 2 negative control replicates. The mean corrected opacity reading for the positive control was 62.0. The corneas treated with the test substance were noted to be slightly cloudy and wrinkled and the corneas treated with the positive control were completely clouded over following treatment.
The mean group corrected optical density for the test substance was 0.013. The mean group corrected optical density for the negative control was 0.000. This result was calculated using 2 negative control replicates. The mean group corrected optical density for the positive control was 0.744. - Interpretation of results:
- other: Inconclusive
- Conclusions:
- Under the study conditions, eye irritation potential of the test substance was determined to be inconclusive based on bovine corneal opacity and permeability test (IVIS score - 23.0).
- Executive summary:
A study was conducted to determine the in vitro eye damage potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, according to OECD Guideline 437, in compliance with GLP. The eye damage potential of the test substance was tested through topical application for 4 h. The test substance was applied as fomulation 20% w/v solution in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (750 µL) directly on top of the freshly isolated bovine cornea sample. The negative control responses for opacity and permeability was less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas. The mean corrected opacity reading for the test substance was 23, and the mean corrected opacity reading for the positive control was 62.0. The mean group corrected optical density for the test substance was 0.013 and the mean group corrected optical density for the positive control was 0.744. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (Imidazole) was 62.0 and was within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. The test substance produced IVIS score of 23 after 4 h of treatment. Under the study conditions, eye irritation potential of the test substance was determined to be inconclusive based on bovine corneal opacity and permeability test (Payne, 2017).
Referenceopen allclose all
% Viability positive control and test substance:
Designation | Positive Control | Test substance |
% Viability (Tissue 1) | 39.90% | 1.3% |
% Viability (Tissue 2) | 43.00% | 0.9% |
% Viability Mean | 41.40% | 1.1% |
Corneal opacity:
Test chemical | Cornea number | Initial opacity | Post incubation opacity | Change in opacity | Mean change in opacity | Corrected opacity | Mean corrected opacity |
Negative control | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2.00 | -1.0 | 0 |
Negative control | 10 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | ||
Negative control | 11* | - | 2* | 2* | 0.0 | ||
Test substance | 4 | 0 | 29 | 29 | NA | 27.0 | 23.0 |
Test substance | 6 | 0 | 20 | 20 | 18.0 | ||
Test substance | 8 | 0 | 26 | 26 | 24.0 | ||
Positive control | 1 | 0 | 58 | 58 | NA | 56.0 | 62.0 |
Positive control | 25 | -1 | 68 | 69 | 67.0 | ||
Positive control | 26 | -1 | 64 | 65 | 63 |
*Cornea 11 excluded from analysis. Opacity values shown are the mean of corneas 9 and 10.
Corneal permeability:
Test chemical | Cornea number | Mean blank OD490 | OD490 | Corrected OD490 | Mean corrected OD490 | Final corrected OD490 | Mean Group Corrected OD490 |
Negative control | 9 | 0.038 | 0.044 | 0.01 | 0.010 | -0.004 | 0 |
Negative control | 10 | 0.052 | 0.014 | 0.004 | |||
Negative control | 11* | 0.048 | 0.01 | 0.000 | |||
Test substance | 4 | NA | 0.062 | 0.025 | NA | 0.014 | 0.013 |
Test substance | 6 | 0.058 | 0.020 | 0.010 | |||
Test substance | 8 | 0.062 | 0.025 | 0.014 | |||
Positive control | 1 | NA | 0.511 | 0.473 | NA | 0.463 | 0.744 |
Positive control | 25 | 0.846 | 0.809 | 0.799 | |||
Positive control | 26 | 1.019 | 0.981 | 0.971 |
*Cornea 11 excluded from analysis. Values shown are the mean of corneas 9 and 10.
Calculated IVIS:
Test chemical | Mean Opacity | Mean Permeability | IVIS (Mean Opacity + (15 x Mean Permeability)) |
Negative control | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Test substance | 23 | 0.013 | 23.19 |
Positive control | 62.0 | 0.744 | 73.16 |
NA: Not applicable
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Skin irritation
Study 1:
A study was conducted to determine the in vitro skin corrosion potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, according to OECD Guideline 431 and EU Method B.40 bis, in compliance with GLP. The test substance was checked for colour interference in aqueous conditions and possible interference with MTT reduction by adding the test substance to MTT medium. Because the solutions did not turn blue/purple nor a blue/purple precipitate was observed, it was concluded that the test substance did not interfere with the MTT. Duplicate tissue samples were exposed to approximately 25 mg of the test substance, which was pre-moistened with 25 μL water to ensure good contact with the tissue surface. Post treatment, a determination of the cytotoxic effect was performed. Cytotoxicity was expressed as the reduction of mitochondrial dehydrogenase activity measured by formazan production from MTT at the end of the treatment. Skin corrosion was expressed as the remaining cell viability after exposure to the test substance. The positive control had a mean relative tissue viability of -0.4% after the 1 h exposure. The absolute mean OD570 (optical density at 570 nm) of the negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of OECD Guideline 431 and the laboratory historical control data range. In the range of 20 - 100% viability the coefficient of variation between tissue replicates was <30%, indicating that the test system functioned properly. The relative mean tissue viability obtained after 3 min and 1 h treatment periods with the test substance compared to the negative control tissues were 58% and 20.4%, respectively. Because the mean relative tissue viability for the test substance was above 50 and 15% after 3 min and 1 h respectively, so the test substance is considered to be non-corrosive. Under the study conditions, the test substance was determined to be non-corrosive to skin based on human three dimensional epidermal model (Payne, 2017).
Study 2:
A study was conducted to determine the skin irritation potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, using Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RhE) Test Method, according to OECD Guideline 439, in compliance with GLP. The test substance was checked for colour interference in aqueous conditions and possible interference with MTT reduction by adding the test substance to MTT medium. Because the solutions did not turn blue/purple nor a blue/purple precipitate was observed, it was concluded that the test substance did not interfere with the MTT. Three tissues of the human skin model EpiDermTM were treated with the test substance, positive or negative control by application of 25 mg (tissues wetted with 25 µLwith PBS) for 60 min (25 min at room temperature and 35 min at 37°C, 5% CO2) and 42 h post incubation period. PBS was used as negative control and 5% of sodium dodecyl sulphate solution in PBS was used as positive control. Subsequently, viability of the tissues was assessed and compared to the negative control. The absolute mean of the positive and negative control tissues was within the acceptance limits of the guideline and the laboratory historical control data range indicated that the test system functioned properly. Under the study conditions, based on the percentage of viability of 3.3%, the test substance was concluded to be irritant to the skin. (Dreher, 2018).
Eye irritation
Study 1:
A study was conducted to determine the in vitro eye damage potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, according to OECD Guideline 437, in compliance with GLP. The eye damage potential of the test substance was tested through topical application for 4 h. The test substance was applied as fomulation 20% w/v solution in 0.9% sodium chloride solution (750 µL) directly on top of the freshly isolated bovine cornea sample. The negative control responses for opacity and permeability was less than the upper limits of the laboratory historical range indicating that the negative control did not induce irritancy on the corneas. The mean corrected opacity reading for the test substance was 23, and the mean corrected opacity reading for the positive control was 62.0. The mean group corrected optical density for the test substance was 0.013 and the mean group corrected optical density for the positive control was 0.744. The mean in vitro irritancy score of the positive control (Imidazole) was 62.0 and was within two standard deviations of the current historical positive control mean. It was therefore concluded that the test conditions were adequate and that the test system functioned properly. The test substance produced IVIS score of 23 after 4 h of treatment. Under the study conditions, eye irritation potential of the test substance was determined to be inconclusive based on bovine corneal opacity and permeability test (Payne, 2017).
Study 2:
A study was conducted to determine the eye irritation potential of the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, using Reconstructed human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) test method, according to OECD Guideline 492, in compliance with GLP. Two tissues of the EpiOcularTM tissue model were treated with the test substance, positive or negative control. Tissues were pre-wetted with 20 μL of PBS (Sterile Phosphate Buffered Saline) prior to topical application of approximately 50±2 mg of neat test substance. Sterile demineralised water was used as negative control and methyl acetate as positive control. After 6 h exposure on the surface of EpiOcularTM reconstructed ocular epithelium and 18 h post-incubation time, the viability of the tissues was assessed and compared to a negative control. The MTT viability test readings were conducted at 570 nm without reference filter. Under the study conditions, based on the percentage viability of 1.1%, the test substance was concluded to be either eye irritant or inducing serious eye damage to the human eye (Andres, 2018).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Skin irritation:
Based on the results of the in vitro skin irritation studies, the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12-14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates, warrants a classification as Skin Irritant 2 (H315: Causes skin irritation) according to EU CLP (1272/2008/EC) criteria.
Eye irritation:
Based on weight of evidence from the results of in vitro assays and as a conservative approach, the test substance, Quaternary ammonium compounds, C12 -14 alkyltrimethyl, Me sulfates is considered to be irritant to the eyes and warrants a classification as Eye irritant 2 (H319 - causes serious eye irritation) according to EU CLP (1272/2008/EC) criteria.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.