Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 242-177-9 | CAS number: 18297-63-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Eye irritation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 22 Jul 2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 019
- Report date:
- 2019
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2017
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- technical proficiency not shown; the positive control was 10% (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline since the laboratory historical control data was established with this chemical
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2020
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- technical proficiency not shown; the positive control was 10% (w/v) Benzalkonium chloride in saline since the laboratory historical control data was established with this chemical.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU method B.47 (Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test method for identifying ocular corrosives and severe irritants)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2010
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Commission Regulation (EU) No 2017/735 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
- Version / remarks:
- adopted in 2017
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Klimaschutz, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, Wiesbaden, Germany
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)urea
- EC Number:
- 242-177-9
- EC Name:
- 1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)urea
- Cas Number:
- 18297-63-7
- Molecular formula:
- C7H20N2OSi2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3-bis(trimethylsilyl)urea
Constituent 1
Test animals / tissue source
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- SOURCE OF COLLECTED EYES
- Source: AB Schlachthof GmbH & Co. KG, Aschaffenburg, Germany
- Characteristics of donor animals: 14 month old donor cattle
- Storage, temperature and transport conditions of ocular tissue: Freshly isolated bovine eyes of donor cattle were collected from the abattoir. Excess tissue was removed from the excised eyes. The isolated eyes were stored in HBSS (Hank’s Buffered Salt Solution) containing 1% (v/v) penicillin / streptomycin (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin) in the cooled slaughter-house and during transportation on the same morning to the laboratory using a Styrofoam box.
- Time interval prior to initiating testing: The corneas were isolated on the same day after delivery of the eyes and directly used in the BCOP test on the same day.
- Indication of any existing defects or lesions in ocular tissue samples: All eyes were carefully examined macroscopically for defects. Those presenting defects such as vascularization, pigmentation, opacity and scratches were discarded.
- Indication of any antibiotics used: The isolated eyes were stored in HBSS (Hank’s Buffered Salt Solution) containing 1% (v/v) penicillin / streptomycin (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin)
Test system
- Vehicle:
- physiological saline
- Remarks:
- 20% (w/v) suspension
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 750 µL
- Concentration: 20% (w/v) in saline
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 750 µL
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount applied: 750 µL
- Concentration: 10% (w/v) in saline - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 240 min at 32 ± 1 °C
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas were used for each treatment group.
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
The isolated eyes were stored in HBSS (Hank’s Buffered Salt Solution) containing 1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (100 units/mL penicillin and 100 µg/mL streptomycin). The cornea was carefully removed from the eye using scalpel and rounded scissors. A rim of about 2 mm of tissue (sclera) was left for stability and handling of the isolated cornea. A specifically designed corneal holder was used to mount each cornea.
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
Following equilibration, an initial opacity reading was performed to determine the basal opacity (t0). Only corneas with a value of the basal opacity < 7 were used.
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
Sets of three corneas were used for treatment with the test item and for the negative and positive controls, respectively.
TREATMENT METHOD: Open chamber method
Each isolated cornea was mounted in a specially designed cornea holder, which consists of anterior and posterior compartments, which interface with the epithelial and the endothelial sides of the cornea, respectively. The endothelial side of the cornea was positioned against the sealing ring (O- ring) of the posterior part of the holder. The cornea was gently flattened over the O-ring but stretching was avoided. The anterior part of the holder was positioned on top of the cornea and fixed in place with screws. Both compartments of the holder were filled with incubation medium. The posterior compartment was filled first to return the cornea to its natural convex position. Care was taken to assure that no air bubbles were present within the compartments.
For equilibration, the corneae in the holder were incubated in a vertical position for about one hour at 32 ± 1 °C in a water-bath. At the end of the incubation period, the medium was changed and the basal opacity was determined (t0). For treatment, the anterior compartment received the test item suspension or the negative or positive controls at a volume of 750 µL each on the surface of the corneas. The corneas were incubated in a horizontal position at 32 ± 1 °C in the waterbath for 240 min.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Number of washing steps after exposure period: After exposure, the test item or the control items, respectively, were each rinsed off from the according application sides with EMEM containing phenol red for at least three times or more until phenol red was still discoloured (yellow or purple), or the test item was still visible. Once the medium was free of the test item the corneae were given a final rinse with cMEM without phenol red.
- POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION: Not performed
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS:
- Corneal opacity: Following exposure, fresh cMEM was added into the anterior compartment and the opacity determinations were performed. Corneal opacity was determined by the amount of light transmission through the cornea via an opacitometer (OP_KiT opacitometer (Electro Design, 63-Riom, France)).
- Corneal permeability: The passage of sodium fluorescein dye was measured with the aid of a microplate reader (Versamax® Molecular Devices). The optical density at 490 nm (OD490) of each sampling tube was determined using the software SoftMax Pro Enterprise (version 4.7.1).
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA:
Test substance with an IVIS > 55 was regarded as Category 1.
Test substance with an IVIS ≤ 3 was regarded as No Category.
Test substance with an IVIS > 3; ≤ 55: no prediction can be made.
Results and discussion
In vitro
Results
- Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Remarks:
- mean value of 3 corneas
- Run / experiment:
- 240 min exposure
- Value:
- 1.04
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- DEMONSTRATION OF TECHNICAL PROFICIENCY: Not included by the testing laboratory.
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: Yes, the negative control responses result in opacity (0.33) and permeability values (0.060) that are less than the established upper limits for background opacity and permeability values for bovine corneae treated with the respective negative control.
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: Yes, the positive control resulted in an IVIS value (90.93 ± 6.32) which fell within two standard deviations of the current historical mean.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 2: Results of the BCOP test after 240 min of exposure
Test Group | Opacity value: Difference (t240 - t0) opacity | Permeability at 490 nm (OD490) | IVIS | Mean IVIS ± SD | Evaluation | ||
Individual | Mean | Individual | Mean | ||||
Negative Control | 1.0 | 0.33 | 0.062 | 0.06 | 1.93 | 1.24 ± 0.60 | No Category |
0.0 | 0.060 | 0.90 | |||||
0.0 | 0.059 | 0.89 | |||||
Positive Control | 83.67* | 0.381* | 89.38 | 90.93 ± 6.32 | Category 1 | ||
79.67* | 0.391* | 85.53 | |||||
91.67* | 0.415* | 97.89 | |||||
Test item | 1.67* | 0.00** | 1.67 | 1.04 ± 0.54 | No Category | ||
0.67* | 0.00** | 0.67 | |||||
0.67* | 0.009* | 0.80 |
* corrected values
** value was set to zero since the calculated value was negative
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- other: CLP/EU GHS criteria not met, no classification required according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
- Conclusions:
- CLP: Not classified
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.