Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
flash point of flammable liquids
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.9 (Flash-Point)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
equilibrium method closed cup
Flash point apparatus:
Setaflash apparatus

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Caramel (color)
EC Number:
232-435-9
EC Name:
Caramel (color)
Cas Number:
8028-89-5
Molecular formula:
C6H12OH
IUPAC Name:
Caramel

Results and discussion

Flash point
Key result
Flash point:
> 100 °C
Atm. press.:
ca. 101.3 kPa

Any other information on results incl. tables

No flash was observed during the pre-test under 100°C using 2 ml of the test item. During the pre-test with 4 ml of test item, a flash point of 100.0°C was detected by the apparatus. However, no flash was observed by the technician. It appeared that the steam released during the dipping of the ignitor extinguishes the flame and the apparatus consider it as a flash. Moreover, this flash was detected during the first dipping of the ignitor and was therefore considered as invalid. Another pre-test was performed with the same operatory conditions and the same result was observed. A third pre-test was performed from 85°C using 4 ml and a flash was detected at 85°C during the first dipping of the ignitor.

Three trials were then performed from 85°C to 115°C using 2 ml. During the first trial, a flash was detected at 108.0°C. No flash was detected during the second trial. During the third trial, flash was detected at 100.0°C. Flash was still not observed by the technician during these trials.

In addition, the flash point of the reference substances CRM and Butanol respect the checking cards limits.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
No flash point was observed between 25.0°C and 100.0°C using 2 ml of the substance.
No exploitation is possible over 100.0°C because the used quantities (4ml) cause the systematic extinction of the flame (release of steam) during the first dipping of the ignitor. The apparatus considers this extinction as a flash and stops the measurement. In addition, this observation is not repeatable. The extinction temperature may vary from one test to another with the same operating conditions.
As no exploitation is possible with 4 ml and therefore over 100.0°C, the result of flash point is given as “> 100.0°C”.