Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation:
In an in vivo skin irritation study in New Zealand White rabbits according to OECD Guideline 404 (Safepharm, 1990), test material “Reaction mass of N-butylphthalimide and N-sec-butylphthalimide and N-propylphthalimide”, was observed to be not corrosive and not irritating to skin.
Eye irritation:
In an in vivo acute eye irritation study in New Zealand White rabbits according to OECD Guideline 405 (Safepharm, 1990), test material “Reaction mass of N-butylphthalimide and N-sec-butylphthalimide and N-propylphthalimide”, was observed to be not to be not an eye irritant. Mean scores of 0 at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material for corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctivae, and chemosis (3 of 3 tested animals) were observed.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 9 August 1990 and 16 August 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study according to OECD404 used to draw a conclusion on the non corrosive/ non-irritating properties to skin of the tested substance, which differs slightly from registered substance. Compostion of tested substance available from another report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 1981
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd.,Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, u.K
- Age at study initiation: Approx 12-16 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 2.20 - 2.35 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum Rabbit Diet, Preston Farmers Limited, New Leake, Boston, Lincolnshire, U.K
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 -24°C
- Humidity (%): 60 - 69%
- Air changes (per hr): approx. 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12h dark/ 12 h light - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 hours
- Observation period:
- Approximately one hour following the removal of the patches and 24, 48 and 72 hours later
- Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: gauze patch soaked with 0.5 ml test substance. The patch was secured in position with a strip of surgical adhesive tape (BLENDERM: approximate size 2.5 cm x 4.0 cm). To prevent the animals interfering with the patches, the trunk of each rabbit was wrapped in an elasticated corset (TUBIGRIP)
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Residual test material removed by gentle swabbing with cotton wool soaked in diethyl ether.
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
one hour following the removal of the patches and 24, 48 and 72 hours later
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation: Draize J.H.(1959) Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Austin, Texas, "The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs
and Cosmetics" - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 1.3
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks:
- after 7 days stil desquamation visible
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reaction extends beyond treatment site, Desquamation
- Remarks:
- Hemorrhage of dermal capillaries was observed after 1 h, but dissapeared after 24 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 Days
- Remarks:
- after 7 days stil desquamation visible
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reaction extemds beyond treatmetn site. Desquamation
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reaction extends beyond treatmetn site, Desquamation
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0.7
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0.3
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- To evaluate the classification of the substances according to CLP Regulation, the raw data was reinterpreted.
The mean value from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal calculated in at least 2 of 3 tested animals were the following:
- erythema/eschar: score 7/6=1.17 (2 out of 3 animals)
- oedema: 3/6=0.5 (2 out of 3 animals) - Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The results of the available OECD 404 study shows that the test item Reaction mass of N-butylphthalimide and N-sec-butylphthalimide and N-propylphthalimide is not corrosive and not irritating to skin according to the regulation 1272/2008/EC after reinterpretation of the raw data.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material Reaction mass of N-butylphthalimide and N-sec-butylphthalimide and N-propylphthalimide to the skin of the New Zealand white rabbit. The method used followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of chemicals(1981) No' 404 "Acute Dermal Irritation/Corrosion" referenced as Method 84 in commission Directive 84/449/EEC. The results may be used as a basis for classification and labelling according to the Regulation 1272/2008/EC after reinterpretation of the raw data.
A single 4-hour, semi-occluded application of the test material to the intact skin of three rabbits produced very slight to well-defined erythema and very slight to slight oedema.
The mean value from gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after patch removal calculated were the following:
- erythema/eschar: score 7/6=1.17 (2 out of 3 animals)
- oedema: 3/6=0.5 (2 out of 3 animals)
Incidents of desquamation and haemorrhage of the dermal capillaries were also noted. On occasions the reactions extended beyond the treatment sites. No corrosive effects were noted.
The test material is not corrosive and not irritant to skin according to the regulation 1272/2008/EC.
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- data waiving: supporting information
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 6 September 1990 - 10 September 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study according to OECD405 used to draw a conclusion on the non corrosive/ non-irritating properties to the eyes of the tested substance, which differs slightly from registered substance. Compostion of tested substance available from another report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- 1987
- Deviations:
- not specified
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd., Moston, Sandbach, Cheshire, U.K.
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 - 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.42 - 2.85 kg
- Housing: individually housed in suspended metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum Rabbit Diet, preston Farmers Limited, New Leake, Boston, Lincolnshire, U.K.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 21 °C
- Humidity (%): 58 - 65%
- Air changes (per hr): Approx. 15 changes per hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours dark / 12 hours light - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml instilled into the conjunctival sac of the right eye
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The upper and lower eyelids were held together for about one second immediately after instillation, to prevent loss of the test material, and then released.
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Assessment of ocular damage/imitation was made approximately 1 hour and 24,48 and 72 hours following treatment
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3 animals
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize J.H. 1959, Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Austin, Texas, 'The Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics"
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: light source from a standard ophthalmoscope. - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- All treated eyes appeared normal at the 24-hour observation.
Mean scores of 0 following gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material for corneal opacity, iritis and conjunctivae (3 of 3 tested animals) were observed. - Other effects:
- Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment.
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test material Reaction mass of N-butylphthalimide and N-sec-butylphthalimide and N-propylphthalimide did not produce any positive response in an OECD 405 study. Mean scores of 0 at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material for corneal opacity, iritis, conjunctivae, and chemosis (3 of 3 tested animals) were observed. The results allows clear decision that the test item is not corrosive and not irritating to the eyes according to the regulation 1272/2008/EC.
- Executive summary:
A study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material Reaction mass of N-butylphthalimide and N-sec-butylphthalimide and N-propylphthalimide to the eye of the New Zealand white rabbit. The method used followed that described in the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals (1987) No. 405 "Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion" referenced as Method 85 in Commission Directive 84/449/EEC.
The results may be used as a basis for classification and labelling according to the regulation 1272/2008/EC after reinterpretation of the data.
A single instillation of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced minimal conjunctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal 24 hours after treatment.
The test material did not produce a positive response in any of the rabbits. Mean scores of 0 following gradings at 24, 48 and 72 hours after installation of the test material for corneal opacity, iritis,
conjunctivae and chemosis (3 of 3 tested animals) were observed. The results allows clear decision that the substance is not corrosive and not irritating to the eyes according to the regulation 1272/2008/EC.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- data waiving: supporting information
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.