Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 604-314-4 | CAS number: 142844-00-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Basic toxicokinetics
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- basic toxicokinetics in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15th August 1997 To:14th December 1997
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- Only one sex was used and indeed is required by the related test protocol. All the exposures produced lung burdens that inhibited macrophage clearance of tracer particles, such exposures produce effects regardless of the materials causing this inhibition. Only one exposure concentration was used and this does not enable the complete comparison of does and effect for different materials,
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 001
- Report date:
- 2001
Materials and methods
- Objective of study:
- other: The purpose of this study was to compare various fibres at identical concentrations during the development of substitute fibres for the present classified material therefore it is not possible to use this study to identify no effect levels etc as no dose
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: ECB/TM/16/97
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- high doses conc
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- oxo[(oxoalumanyl)oxy]alumane; silanedione
- EC Number:
- 604-314-4
- Cas Number:
- 142844-00-6
- Molecular formula:
- amorphous glass Si(n)O(3n+1) polymeric anions bonded to Zr and Al(3+)
- IUPAC Name:
- oxo[(oxoalumanyl)oxy]alumane; silanedione
- Details on test material:
- Exposure was to a test article prepared from commercial high purity RCF wool (sample designated d in tables) prepared by milling, grinding and size separation -as the activity of fibres is determined to a large part by their size, the sizes of the fibres in the test materials are detailed in table 1 in additional material section
Constituent 1
- Radiolabelling:
- other: integrity of macrophage clearance from the lung was estimated by thoracic radioactivity measurements after a brief inhalation of tracer particles
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Fischer 344
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland
- Age at study initiation: 9-10 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 110-120g at start of exposure
- Housing: polypropylene cage 2 rats /cage
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 2weeks
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C):22+-2C
- Humidity (%):55+- 15%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hours day/night cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 15th August 1997 To:14th December 1997
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Remarks:
- air
- Details on exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: The aerosol was generated by a pneumatic disperser, static was neutralised using a 63 nickel radiation source. - nose only flow past system as described in doses and concentrations
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Battelle tube
- Air flow rate: 1litre/min per rat
- Method of particle size determination: Samples of aerosol were collected membrane filters, these were weighed for gravimetric and fibres counted by SEM except for the amosite positive control where TEM was used
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes - Duration and frequency of treatment / exposure:
- 6 hours/day 5 days /week -89days, to a target concentration of 150 fibres longer than 20 microns/ml
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
515+-139 WHO f/ml, 137+- 30 fibres longer than 20 micron/ml mass conc 58.6+-10.4 mg.m3
- No. of animals per sex per dose / concentration:
- 57 males
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Positive control reference chemical:
- Amosite asbestos long fibered 146 f/ml
756+-133 WHO f/ml
146+-20 fibres longer than 20 micron/ml
mass conc 65+0.3 mg.m3 - Details on study design:
- The study was carried out at the same time on less biopersistent fibres
The controls were: Non fibrous particulate with the same composition as this fibre, a long fibre amosite asbestos and an unexposed group(air).
The state of macrophage mediated lung clearance was monitored by studying a group of rats exposed for 10 min to a radioactive aerosol. Retained
particulate estimated in live animals by counting the thoracic content of isotope
- Dose selection rationale: To ensure consistent dosing of long fibres with positive control
- Rationale for animal assignment (if not random):Randomly assigned by body weight using datatox systems so that mean weight of group was within 1% of overall mean
The EU guideline ECB/TM/16(97) rev. 1 was largely followed except that some animals were allowed to survive for one year after exposure for 90 days to enable any pathology to resolve or develop. Cell proliferation in the terminal bronchioles and in the lung parenchyma was measured by the BrDU method. The dose of fibres in the lung was estimated by counting the fibres in the ashed tissue. RCF fibres were counted by SEM and amosite by TEM Non fibrous aluminosilicate glass content was measured using chemical analysis for the aluminium content of the ash. The dust content of the lung associated lymph nodes was also measured. The integrity of macrophage clearance from the lungs was estimated by thoracic radioactivity measurements after a brief inhalation of tracer particles - Details on dosing and sampling:
- Inhalation as described in doses above, fibres samples taken from breathing zone of animals for analysis by SEM and optical microscopy , biverate distribution and gravimeteric analysis.
- Statistics:
- Difference between groups were considered statistically significant at p<0.05. Data were analysed using analysis of variance. If the group means differed significantly by analysis of variance the means of the treated groups were compared with the means of the control groups based on the Dunnetts' test
Results and discussion
Toxicokinetic / pharmacokinetic studies
- Details on absorption:
- None
- Details on distribution in tissues:
- NA
- Details on excretion:
- Half life clearance from lung see table 5
Metabolite characterisation studies
- Metabolites identified:
- not specified
- Details on metabolites:
- Material is not metabolised.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 3 Terminal Body weights (SD) male rats(g)
Control |
Amosite asbestos |
RCF |
Non fibrous aluminosilicate |
259.0 (17.4) |
235.1 (11.8) |
259.1 (22.6) |
250.0 (8.7) |
Table 4 Terminal lung weights
Control |
Amosite asbestos |
RCF |
Non fibrous aluminosilicate |
1.049 (0.080) |
1.214 (0.031) |
1.188 (0.087) |
1.425 (0.096) |
Table 5 Clearance of test substance from the lung Mean (90%CL) days
Material |
HALF TIME IN DAYS |
|||
Number of fibres |
Number of WHO fibres |
Number of fibres >20 microns long |
Mass |
|
RCF |
338(286-389) |
328(269-388) |
145(120-170) |
145(120-170) |
Amosite |
402(270-536) |
502(298-706) |
561(174-948) |
444(295-594) |
Non fibrous alumina silicate glass |
|
|
|
91(79-102 |
Half times calculated according to ECB/TM/26 counts less than 5% of initial burden discounted.
Table 6 Clearance of Tracer particles from alveolar region of lung
Materials |
Half time of alveolar tracer clearance (95 CL) days
|
|
5 days post exposure |
6 months post exposure |
|
Control
|
56 (54-58) |
66 (60-73) |
RCF
|
435 (243-594) |
467 (314-908) |
AES |
88 (79-98) |
86 (79-95)
|
Nonfibrous aluminosilicate |
1202 (778-2641) |
infinite |
Amosite asbestos
|
125 (112-140) |
81( 75-89) |
All clearance times significantly slower than control at p<0.001
RCF, amosite and AES and the non-fibrous aluminosilicate glass deposited in the lung at concentrations that overloaded lung clearance. But the effect of the non-fibrous materials is much more extreme.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- All the exposures produced lung burdens that inhibited macrophage clearance of tracer particles, such exposures produce effects regardless of the materials causing this inhibition
- Executive summary:
Following this study a standard protocol for the 90 day study was adapted by the ECB. The EU guideline ECB/TM/16(97) rev. 1 was largely followed except that some animals were allowed to survive for one year after exposure for 90 days to enable any pathology to resolve or develop. Cell proliferation in the terminal bronchioles and in the lung parenchyma was measured by the BrDU method.. The dose of fibres in the lung was estimated by counting the fibres in the ashed tissue. RCF fibres were counted by SEM and amosite by TEM Non fibrous aluminosilicate glass content was measured using chemical analysis for the aluminium content of the ash, The dust content of the lung associated lymph nodes was also measured. The integrity of macrophage clearance from the lungs was estimated by thoracic radioactivity measurements after a brief inhaltion of tracer particles
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.