Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Under the conditions of a repeated insult (occlusive) patch test procedure conducted in a panel of 112 subjects, with all types of skin, the product "Dermatologist-Tested" and did not induce clinically significant skin irritation nor show any evidence of induced allergic dermatitis in human subjects.

The product can be considered as "hypoallergenic".

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Justification for type of information:
Data on human volunteers are available
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
data waiving: supporting information
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

A panel of 113 men and women human volunteers participated in a repeat insult patch test in which a test product to the back of the subjects under occlusive patches. 112 subjects completed the study. During the induction phase 9 patches were applied, separated by a 48 h interval. The patches were removed 48 h after application. Following 2 weeks rest period, a challenge patch was applied and the sites scored 30 minutes, 48 and 72 h after application.

 

No reaction were observed during the induction nor the challenge phase.

 

Under the conditions employed in this study, the test item did not induce clinically significant skin irritation nor show any evidence of induced allergic contact dermatitis. The test item can be considered as "hypoallergenic".

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

In a human repeat insult patch test, the test item was concluded to be hypoallergenic. Based on this result and due to the nature of the main constituents of the registered substance (proteins from Lupinus Albus seeds), the registered substance does not need to be classified as skin sensitiser.