Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2004
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Remarks:
No data about test item composition

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2004
Report date:
2004

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Lupine, L. albus, ext.
EC Number:
282-001-8
EC Name:
Lupine, L. albus, ext.
Cas Number:
84082-55-3
IUPAC Name:
Enzymatic hydrolysis products of Lupinus Albus, Fabaceae, seed
Test material form:
liquid
Details on test material:
Amber liquid

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Janvier (53940 Le genest St Isle FRANCE)
- Females nulliparous and non-pregnant
- Age at study initiation: about 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 210.2g - 220.0g
- Housing: Animals were housed by group of three in solid bottomed clear polycarbonate cages with stain less steel mesh lid.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Foodstuff (A04-10), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Acidified, tap water (pH 2.5) (wtaer samples analyzed every 6 months for physico-chemical and bacteriological analysis)
- Acclimation period: 5 days at least

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22° C ± 2° C,
- Humidity (%): from 50 ± 20%,
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10 cycles per hour
- Photoperiod : (12 hrs day / 12 hrs darkness).

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
In the first step of the study, the test item was administrated by gavage under a volume of 2 mL/kg body weight (corresponding to 2000 mg/kg bw, according to study report).
Doses:
2 mL/ kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
3 (females only)
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
The animals were observed regularly on the day of administration (immediately, within 30 minutes after gavage, 1h, 2h, 3h and 4h after administration) and then at least once a day for at least 14 days.
Immediately after administration of the test item, attention was drawn to the signs of choking: in the event of death, the dead animals were immediately autopsied and it was verified that death was due to the toxicity of the test item and not to a track error.
The various parameters observed were: spontaneous activity, Preyer reflex, respiratory effect, convulsions, trembling, temperature, muscle tone, grip strength, palpebral ptosis, mydriasis, salivation, lacrimation, reversal reflex, piloerection, diarrhea, lethargy, Coma, changes in skin, coat, eyes, mucous membranes and mortality.

Animals were weighed on D-1 (day before the administration) and just before administering the test item, then on D4, D8 and D15 (equivalent to 3,7 an 14 days after the test item administration).

On D14, the animals were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital 6%, at a rate of 1.16 mL/ kg and bleeding at the femoral artery.
They were autopsied and the main organs were observed macroscopically.
Statistics:
None

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Key result
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
No mortality was observed
Clinical signs:
Slight piloerection was observed on treatment day.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test item was not classifÌed based on a LD50 higher than 2000 mg/kg bw and no significant toxic effects observed at that dose level.
Executive summary:

The test item IN 04 was administered to a group of 6 female Sprague Dawley rats at the dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight. The experimental protocol was established according to the official method as defined in the O.E.C.D. Test Guideline No. 423.

No mortality was noted in the animals treated at the dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight.

The macroscopic examination of the animals at the end of the study did not reveal treatment-related changes.

In conclusion, the LD50 of the test item IN 04 is higher than 2000 mg/kg body weight by oral route in the rat.