Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-131-3 | CAS number: 103-64-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity:
The acute oral toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the test chemical. The LD50 value is between 300-2000 mg/kg bw for acute oral toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical can be classified as “Category IV” for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
Test chemicalhas very low vapour pressure (16.4 Pa= 0.1230101 mmhg),So the potential for the generation of inhalable vapours is very low. Also the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore the acute inhalation toxicity end point was considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal toxicity:
The acute dermal toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the test chemical. The studies concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw for acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is form peer- reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute Oral toxicity test was carried out to study the effects of test chemical on rats.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: no data
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- not specified
- Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on oral exposure:
- not specified
- Doses:
- 1250 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- not specified
- Statistics:
- not specified
- Preliminary study:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- 1 250 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- 95% CL:
- >= 8 200 - <= 189 000
- Remarks on result:
- other: 50 % mortality observed
- Mortality:
- 50% mortality was observed in treated rat at dose 1250 mg/kg bw.
- Clinical signs:
- other: not specified
- Gross pathology:
- not specified
- Other findings:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- Toxicity Category IV
- Conclusions:
- The lethal concentration (LD50) value for acute oral toxicity test was considered to be 1250 mg/kg bw (95% CI: 8200-189000),when rats were treated with test chemical orally.
- Executive summary:
Acute oral toxicity study was performed in rats using test chemical.50% mortality was observed at dose 1250 mg/kg bw. Hence,LD50 value was considered to be 1250 mg/kg bw(95% CI: 8200-189000),when rats were treated with test chemical orally.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 1 250 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from peer reviewed journal
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- data from handbook or collection of data
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from peer-reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Acute dermal toxicity test was carried out to study the effects of test chemical on rabbits.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Test type:
- other: not specified
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- not specified
- Type of coverage:
- other: Dermal
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Details on dermal exposure:
- not specified
- Duration of exposure:
- not specified
- Doses:
- 6000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- not specified
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- not specified
- Statistics:
- not specified
- Preliminary study:
- not specified
- Sex:
- not specified
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 6 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: No mortality observed
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed in treated rabbits at 6000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs:
- other: not specified
- Gross pathology:
- not specified
- Other findings:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not classified
- Conclusions:
- The LD50 value was considered to be >6000 mg/kg bw,when ratbbits were treated with test chemical by dermal application.
- Executive summary:
In acute dermal toxicity study, rabbits were treated with test chemical in the concentration of 6000 mg/kg bw by dermal application.No mortality was observed in treated rabbits at dose 6000 mg/kg bw.Therefore, LD50 value was considered to be >6000 mg/kg bw,when rabbits were treated with test chemical by dermal application.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 6 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 2 and from peer reviewed journal
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below –
The reported study was mentioned in authoritative database ,handbook ,peer reviewed journal,and secondary report to designed and conducted to determine the acute oral toxicity profile of the given test chemical. Acute oral toxicity study was performed in rats using test chemical.50% mortality was observed at dose 1250 mg/kg bw. Hence,LD50 value was considered to be 1250 mg/kg bw(95% CI: 8200-189000),when rats were treated with test chemical orally.
The above study is supported with another study mentioned in authoritative database and conducted on rat for the test chemical. Acute oral toxicity study was performed in rats using test chemical.50% mortality was observed at dose 1400 mg/kg bw. Hence,LD50 value was considered to be 1400 mg/kg bw,when rats were treated with test chemical orally.
Both the above studies are further supported with the study mentioned in authoritative database for the test chemical. Acute oral toxicity study was performed in rats using test chemical.50% mortality was observed at dose 1231 mg/kg bw. Hence,LD50 value was considered to be 1231 mg/kg bw,when rats were treated with test chemical orally.
Thus, based on the above summarised study on test chemical, the LD50 value it can be concluded that LD50 value is between 300-2000 mg/kg bw. Therefore, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical can be classified in “Category 4 (300 – ≤ 2000)” for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
Test chemicalhas very low vapour pressure (16.4 Pa= 0.1230101 mmhg),So the potential for the generation of inhalable vapours is very low. Also the normal conditions of use of this substance will not result in aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size, so exposure to humans via the inhalatory route will be highly unlikely and therefore the acute inhalation toxicity end point was considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal toxicity:
In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rabbits for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below -
The reported study was designed and conducted to determine the acute dermal toxicity profile of the given test chemical in rabbits. In acute dermal toxicity study, rabbits were treated with test chemical in the concentration of 6000 mg/kg bw by dermal application.No mortality was observed in treated rabbits at dose 6000 mg/kg bw.Therefore, LD50 value was considered to be >6000 mg/kg bw,when rabbits were treated with test chemical by dermal application.
The above study is supported with another study conducted on rabbits for the test chemical. In acute dermal toxicity study, rabbits were treated with test chemical in the concentration of 5000 mg/kg bw by dermal application.No mortality was observed in treated rabbits at dose 5000 mg/kg bw.Therefore, LD50 value was considered to be >5000 mg/kg bw,when rabbits were treated with test chemical by dermal application.
Both the above studies are further supported with the study mentioned in authoritative database. In acute dermal toxicity study, rabbits were treated with test chemical in the concentration of 20000 mg/kg bw by dermal application.No mortality was observed in treated rabbits at dose 20000 mg/kg bw.Therefore, LD50 value was considered to be 20000 mg/kg bw,when rabbits were treated with test chemical by dermal application.
Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is between 300-2000 mg/kg bw for acute oral and >2000 mg/kg bw for acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical can be classified in “Category 4 (300 – ≤ 2000)” for acute oral toxicity and cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity. For acute inhalation toxicity wavier was added so, not possible to classify.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.